visajoe1
Well-Known Member
Do you have any performance info on difference between gen 5 and 6 by chance?1818s are great chips... and theres plenty of driver options. great deal by robin there
Do you have any performance info on difference between gen 5 and 6 by chance?1818s are great chips... and theres plenty of driver options. great deal by robin there
test em yourself.not to be a dick but im starting to wonder why we would take 1 vendors word on numbers from the products they sell (shitizen) lol.these cree numbers were ran by several well known members here many of whom had no ties to sales to cree.
that simulator is good to compare chips of same manufacturer but not so much mfr vs mfr due to the way each mfr calculates their simulationscree 3590 can be had for around 31.00 these days,so how long would it take to cover the extra cost when your gaining 10% eff right away? the citi cobs look to be around the same eff as a cmh/lec setup is right now.40% and better spectrum from the lec is almost a no brainer.
Actually the tools can be somewhat accurate. Cree doesn't include color temp like citizen. So the numbers the tool spits out is actually close to what has been Sphere tested. What most of us don't do is use a realistic Tj which in Crees case can severally impact performance. Samsung's tool thus far has been slightly under exaggerated(which I'm glad to see). The tools are a nice baseline but as always a sphere test at system level is best lol.that simulator is good to compare chips of same manufacturer but not so much mfr vs mfr due to the way each mfr calculates their simulations
i mean we still have people who believe that crees can hit 56% efficiency at chip level in a real-world application when thats been demonstrated to not be the case in several tests
90 CRI LER 3351818 3500K90Min 2 COBS @400 mA
umol/s/W: 1.93 LER: 335.00 QER: 4.81
Also going by data sheets middle of the bin which is not realistic for 3500k Cree honestly. The old numbers where not accurate but moving forward I think we can get a better use with the tools now that we know how to accurately use them.can be accurate... but in that case the oft-cited cree 56% efficiency is at an unrealistic 25C Tj
Just using calculator. I'm thinking it isnt accurate for 1818 chip90 CRI LER 335
How
As per sphere data we have for 1818 90 cri 286.6 LER
QER 4.955
at one cob per square foot you'll have great penetration. to maximize the intensity 2 foot down at canopy make sure your lights are 24" above your canopy where youre getting 1500 ppfd, and the geometry will be in your favorI'm wanting to get 1500 ppfd at canopy 12 inches away from bulb and penetrate 2 feet into canopy.
send me a DB 3500k and ill run it beside the 1212 gen 6..i would love to see citi make a chip that does what cree does @ 36v so we can use our current drivers to run them.
If I ran the cobs at 1.4a and had them 24 inch away would I get 1500 ppfd at the canopy though?at one cob per square foot you'll have great penetration. to maximize the intensity 2 foot down at canopy make sure your lights are 24" above your canopy where youre getting 1500 ppfd, and the geometry will be in your favor
depends on the space, reflectivity, etc. photons dont disappear they just spread out. in a tent you have them hostage.If I ran the cobs at 1.4a and had them 24 inch away would I get 1500 ppfd at the canopy though?
For that distance would I not need to run them harder?