The Party of Tolerance and Acceptance.

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
President Obama had 2 years with the 111th, and was able to secure the highest award for "peace" while conducting wars every day for 8 years (miraculous feat), if he could pull that off he had a shot, right?
Yeah, so how about the magnificent job that his predecessor had done on the same problem of wealth inequality? Just saying, GOP had all the marbles and they just rooted about like hogs. Obama had the great recession to deal with during those 2 years you mention and I'm thankful the GOP obstructionists were held in check. At the end of Obama's term, employment is up, real wages are finally going up, deficits are shrinking, all against a headwind of the "I hope he fails" congress.
 

CannaBruh

Well-Known Member
^ I just wanted you to redact your implying of his 8year uphill battle that didn't happen.

Ever hear of Standard Oil?

Who sold off the airwaves?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
^ I just wanted you to redact your implying of his 8year uphill battle that didn't happen.

Ever hear of Standard Oil?

Who sold off the airwaves?
The reply button is that little tag on the lower left of my post that says "reply". It's useful to let people know who you are talking to. Otherwise you just look like an idiot talking to yourself.

If you are claiming Obama didn't have an obstructionist Congress blocking nearly everything he was trying to accomplish, well, there is a line from a great philosopher of our times that deals with your claim that the obstruction is a liberal lie:

upload_2017-1-20_17-48-42.jpeg
 

CannaBruh

Well-Known Member
You speak of gutting the country, an you meme me when I cite your champion in Clinton for doing exactly that via the 1996 act... but go ahead and meme again, value added. (sarcasm noted)
 

b4ds33d

Well-Known Member
Simply quoting government data doesn't mean anything definitive, other than you believe them. If 90% of people are meaningfully employed, then why don't more than 60% of Americans have more than $1000? I mean, it's either everything else is completely FUBAR, or the number might not have come from God's lips.
so what you are suggesting is NOT going full retard one direction or the other and being critical of everything? brilliant! i'm buying in!
 

CannaBruh

Well-Known Member
Sorry, I will explicitly quote you for your convenience. Beginning the next time I address you.

Redirect... you claimed Obama was obstructed for 8 years (para-phrasing) which is wrong. I was pointing out that you were wrong in forgetting about the existence of the 111th congress.
 

b4ds33d

Well-Known Member
You speak of gutting the country, an you meme me when I cite your champion in Clinton for doing exactly that via the 1996 act... but go ahead and meme again, value added. (sarcasm noted)
memes are used in arguments/debate when one has no salient thought of their own and must turn to google image search as they grasp at straws... cute really.
 

CannaBruh

Well-Known Member
It's non-value adding. It actually is very ironic as it plays much to the "reality TV" society fueled by those including President Trump, and for someone to loath a man so much and then fall into the same tact is just fucking blowing my mind..
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Sorry, I will explicitly quote you for your convenience. Beginning the next time I address you.

Redirect... you claimed Obama was obstructed for 8 years (para-phrasing) which is wrong. I was pointing out that you were wrong in forgetting about the existence of the 111th congress.
there were only 72 days during the 111th in which they had a filibuster proof majority.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Obama was obstructed for 8 years (para-phrasing) which is wrong.
Ummm, you seem to be talking to yourself again. Perhaps you are just talking in your sleep? Because you aren't making any sense. The statement (above) is false. Nobody can possibly think what you just said is true. Nobody. Not even Trump. Although he would lie about that.
 

choomer

Well-Known Member
Buckold, you will comment on ANYTHING except you welshing on your bet.

Yup, all numbers are suspect. If they weren't the IRS would never audit anyone now would they?
Individual, company, or country any investor likes an outside audit as they've seemed to show discrepancies in what's reported before.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Buckold, you will comment on ANYTHING except you welshing on your bet.

Yup, all numbers are suspect. If they weren't the IRS would never audit anyone now would they?
Individual, company, or country any investor likes an outside audit as they've seemed to show discrepancies in what's reported before.
is your quote button broken or something?

and why are you arguing against the very fact checkers you cited this morning?

this has got to be embarrassing for you. just stop.
 
Top