The Party of Tolerance and Acceptance.

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Simply quoting government data doesn't mean anything definitive, other than you believe them. If 90% of people are meaningfully employed, then why don't more than 60% of Americans have more than $1000? I mean, it's either everything else is completely FUBAR, or the number might not have come from God's lips.
U-6 unemployment is 9.9%, not 30% like you are trying to claim.

spew some more shit now, anime virgin.
 

Milliardo Peacecraft

Well-Known Member
U-6 unemployment is 9.9%, not 30% like you are trying to claim.

spew some more shit now, anime virgin.
Okay, I know that's what it's reported as, but are you aware of the metrics and sample size they use to calculate that? You're making the case that the study is perfect. I'm saying it says nothing about fully employed people working for low wages, and the debt burden/cost of living growing faster than income and job opportunities. That's just facts on the ground man, you don't have to believe everything bureaucrats tell you.

But marijuana is a soul killer and Sadam's got nukes.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Okay, I know that's what it's reported as, but are you aware of the metrics and sample size they use to calculate that? You're making the case that the study is perfect. I'm saying it says nothing about fully employed people working for low wages, and the debt burden/cost of living growing faster than income and job opportunities. That's just facts on the ground man, you don't have to believe everything bureaucrats tell you.

But marijuana is a soul killer and Sadam's got nukes.
U-6 unemployment is 9.9%, not 30% like you are trying to claim.

spew some more shit now, anime virgin.
 

Drowning-Man

Well-Known Member
shit, did you just change your avatar? do you support trum?
Lol you know me and my avys and memes. I like to be redicules ; ) ive had some obama stuff as my avi to. I still have them. Wanna see them lol. By the the way how are you buck? ;)
 
Last edited:

Milliardo Peacecraft

Well-Known Member
there's an enormous and vast gulf between skepticism and lying your ass off.

9.9% is not 30%, anime virgin boi.
I never disputed the fact that that's the number listed, I'm saying it's inaccurate. You're squirming. Washington lies its ass off all the time if it justifies their ends. Here you are trusting known liars and calling me a sucker. You're not bright Buck, and you aren't much of a liberal either.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I never disputed the fact that that's the number listed, I'm saying it's inaccurate. You're squirming. Washington lies its ass off all the time if it justifies their ends. Here you are trusting known liars and calling me a sucker. You're not bright Buck, and you aren't much of a liberal either.
you have not shown that it is inaccurate in any way whatsoever, anime virgin boi.

what's more, you have not shown that it is so incredibly inaccurate as to be off by a whole 20%.

you are the epitome of loud mouthed failure.
 

Milliardo Peacecraft

Well-Known Member
you have not shown that it is inaccurate in any way whatsoever, anime virgin boi.

what's more, you have not shown that it is so incredibly inaccurate as to be off by a whole 20%.

you are the epitome of loud mouthed failure.
I've shown you that no one has any money, which is tacit to saying:

A.Gainful employment is no where near 90%.
or
B.The economy is so fucked up that even being gainfully employed isn't enough to save more than $1000.

So which one is it and how is it Bush's fault?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Simply quoting government data doesn't mean anything definitive, other than you believe them. If 90% of people are meaningfully employed, then why don't more than 60% of Americans have more than $1000? I mean, it's either everything else is completely FUBAR, or the number might not have come from God's lips.
Quoting what you think is pretty much worthless without facts to back it up.

Speaking of making stuff up, where did your "90% meaningfully employed" come from?

"If 90% of people are meaningfully employed, then why don't more than 60% of Americans have more than $1000?"

Regardless of the source of your consternation, the two statistics are unrelated. It's like asking: If it rained in Oregon, how come residents in Flint Michigan are still dealing with lead in their water?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I've shown you that no one has any money, which is tacit to saying:

A.Gainful employment is no where near 90%.
or
B.The economy is so fucked up that even being gainfully employed isn't enough to save more than $1000.

So which one is it and how is it Bush's fault?

and you have still failed to show a single flaw in their methodology, much less flaws so gaping and horrible that they missed the mark by a full 20%.

you dumb fucking nazi.
 
Top