Coalition Oversight-Audit Application into Coalition Finances
- Thread starter Sandy420
- Start date
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
Isn't the 'MMAR Coalition Against Repeal' kinda obsolete now, anyway? Most of us don't give a fuck about the coalition or Nadine's endless quest for self-importance. We won. It will soon be legal for everyone. End of story.
CalyxCrusher
Well-Known Member
Can we bookmark this to look back on when nothing happens?
Nadine Bews
Well-Known Member
Thank you and ditto. I understand that self-flagillation is extremely therapeutic so I shall visualize you whilst self-medicating.
Nadine Bews
Well-Known Member
The ends do not justify the means.
The Hippy
Well-Known Member
If genuine illegal practises or methods were employed Nadine, please continue to do what is correct. I support any action to correct injustices done to patients by the legal team or anyone else involved with the coalition. It's as simple as that and i see no need for the personal attacks on you.
However if this is some sort of " get em back cause your just piss off " then I'm out. I wouldn't offer support to a personal vendetta if this was the case.
But if you are justified, I say yes, and thank you for doing what's right. Patients paid up and we expect honesty from those who took the money. Anything other than honesty for the patients is not acceptable to me anyway.
Good luck Nadine and disregard the personal stuff said to you here from my perspective.
I will admit that i'm not able to follow all the accusations you've made but am hoping your genuinely out to right wrongs.
Best wishes
Nadine Bews
Well-Known Member
Those idiots should not have used a forensic auditor to act as founding chair of their phantom organization nor should have they permitted me to author all of the founding documents to solicit funds from the public because I advised them that I was a highly trained self-empoyed non-designated forensic auditor (money cop) and that under the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act, I am obliged to report my findings or else be found to be complicit and subject to penalty and punishment.
Nadine Bews
Well-Known Member
Thank you Hippy...you have greatly inspired me and restored my faith in humanity and that intelligent articulate minds do exist in the cyber-world.
The Hippy
Well-Known Member
Oh my, I'm rarely called intelligent or articulate around here.
To me if this is a legal issue there is no need to attack anyone personally. Even the other side. Because if a person is right....your right. And these type of things can be proven. So it should simply continue forth. It's either black or white legally. Which is lucky, because then it can be proven what is really going on in a situation. Numbers are numbers. Either they add up.......or they don't.
I would imagine there is plenty of proof positive or proof negative for all accusations. But only one can be correct. So lets let those who would know how to assess the legality do that.
Just because we have won whatever is no reason to ignore illegal stuff done with patients money.
If they did nothing they can show that and we can be wrong...all good. but if not...then justice should be served imo.
This is also why I'm not taking any side.....just listening and trying to follow it all. I pass zero judgement on you for your actions if we were really screwed somehow. WHO WOULDN"T.
One thing I really don't like though is when folks are accused who really did nothing wrong...that get's the goat angry...haha.
So please make these points legally and lawfully executed. Then you have no reason to feel anything but right in doing so.
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
what happened to the kidnapping charges?
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
Unless I see evidence of wrongdoing or criminal activity, I'll stick with my original theory of Nadine being butt-hurt and wanting some of the spotlight. She seemed to try her case here on this forum a few months back, but strangely there is no charges. I am sure Conroy and Wilcox are gathering up all those wonderful things you accused them of in order to sue for defamation.
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
According to whom? You have not provided an once of evidence to support any claims you have made, so I'm thinking both the 'end' and the 'means' were justified. You have been given many, many opportunities to prove you are not simply a mentally disturbed woman with a personal vendetta, yet you ignore the chance...why? Why do you insist on fighting your legal battles on this forum? Nobody cares about you or your games except you.
CalyxCrusher
Well-Known Member
Without context it means nothing. Could be any million of posts on facebook. Should we know or care about them?
torontomeds
Well-Known Member
I agree, but hurt.........You spend your time on RIU bitching about Conroy and his crew, you say you are "Highly trained" but yet you spend all your time on RIU. You say you are a money cop, welll guess what, we dont like your type around here, I do not make friends with snitch rats, next thing you know you will start trying to snitch on one of us. If I was Mod I would of banned her and her minions already.
CalyxCrusher
Well-Known Member
Ignore for you. Dont need your spamming without context. Should lock this thread and be done with it
Nadine Bews
Well-Known Member
fyi...
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
What ever happened to the kidnapping allegations? You forgot to answer.........