Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
So how does the logic follow that the 1% of people who voted for Stein are what lost Clinton the election and not the 9% of Democrats that voted for Trump?
How to validate a stereotype, presented by Buzzfeed
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you keep saying 9% as if it were some type of aberration. it isn't, duct tape raper.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
You blamed Clinton's loss on third party voters. Obviously that wasn't the case when 9% of Democrats voted for Trump
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that's not relevant at all since it happens every year in both parties.
and i actually blame the comey letter.
duct tape spread. jesus fucking christ.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
I would guess you blame everything but Hillary Clinton
It gonna take another election loss for you to realize actual progressives don't like moderate Democrats?
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
You're gonna have to elaborate on this duct tape thing.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
RCP polls =/= 538 prediction map
According to the polls, there were 7 different times the outcome of the election was within the margin of error beginning ~October, 2015, and twice when Trump was ahead, once in May, 2016 and again after the Republican convention
Clinton was never "dominating"
According to the polls, there were 7 different times the outcome of the election was within the margin of error beginning ~October, 2015, and twice when Trump was ahead, once in May, 2016 and again after the Republican convention
Clinton was never "dominating"
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Yeah, "interference from Russia", you're referring to what the DNC did during the primary to help the Clinton campaign. The exact same information you and a few others have claimed had no effect on the outcome of the Democratic primary. If what the DNC did had no effect on the Democratic primary, why would anyone have cared about what was leaked?
This question is posed to anyone who believes the actions of the DNC during the Democratic primary had no effect on the outcome. How do you tie up this loose end in your own mind?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
how do you convince yourself that bernie could have won the primary while completely writing off black voters and POC, the backbone of the democratic party?
probably the same reason you didn;t bother to vote or volunteer, and parroted everything trump said: privilege.
duct tape rape.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
If what the DNC did had no effect on the Democratic primary, why would anyone have cared about what was leaked?
You said the DNC didn't do anything wrong. Russia allegedly hacked the DNC and Wikileaks released the emails exposing the collusion I've been talking about for months. Now you're blaming the FBI investigation on Clinton's loss "despite Russia's involvement". In other words, you're blaming Russia and Wikileaks for exposing the process of the DNC, the Clinton campaign and members of the mainstream media to subvert democracy to ensure Clinton would win the primary. You're not blaming the ones who actually did it, you're blaming the whistleblowers who exposed it.
Again, very progressive of you
You said the DNC didn't do anything wrong. Russia allegedly hacked the DNC and Wikileaks released the emails exposing the collusion I've been talking about for months. Now you're blaming the FBI investigation on Clinton's loss "despite Russia's involvement". In other words, you're blaming Russia and Wikileaks for exposing the process of the DNC, the Clinton campaign and members of the mainstream media to subvert democracy to ensure Clinton would win the primary. You're not blaming the ones who actually did it, you're blaming the whistleblowers who exposed it.
Again, very progressive of you
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that risotto recipe doomed us.
bernie didn't even win a majority of young voters and got killed by hillary among black voters, 80-20.
no wonder he lost the primary by 4 million votes.
doesn't stop you dfrom crying rigged though.
stick to duct tape anal rape creampies. that seems to be your specialty. why are you reporting those posts by the way?
you are indeed the moderator of a "duct tape anal spread" subreddit.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
You just said "despite Russia's involvement", you admitted the Democratic primary was rigged. The implication being that Russia leaked the emails they allegedly hacked from the DNC that exposed the blatant corruption within that organization, the Clinton campaign and members of the mainstream media
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
quote it then.
Corso312
Well-Known Member
She could never put that clown away, even after a debate the gap never grew..she is a fucking awful debater and public speaker, I thought she would win a close race but knew it would be close and the polls were horseshit all along.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
You deleted post #67 in which you attributed Hillary Clinton's loss to the James Comey letter published a couple weeks before the election "despite Russian involvement"
Here's my first response to you, post #66;
Followed by your deleted response
Followed by this post, post #68 that is obviously addressing the post you deleted which added the general election prediction from 538 that I pretty clearly addressed in the following post;
As you can see, the posts on my end skip from #66 to #68, confirming Buck deleted his post, #67
You deleted your post that said "despite Russian involvement" considering the implication I just laid out in this post and the previous one, I have to ask.. why?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i didn;t delete shit you moron.You deleted post #67 in which you attributed Hillary Clinton's loss to the James Comey letter published a couple weeks before the election "despite Russian involvement"
Here's my first response to you, post #66;
Followed by your deleted response
Followed by this post, post #68 that is obviously addressing the post you deleted which added the general election prediction from 538 that I pretty clearly addressed in the following post;
As you can see, the posts on my end skip from #66 to #68, confirming Buck deleted his post, #67
You deleted your post that said "despite Russian involvement" considering the implication I just laid out in this post and the previous one, I have to ask.. why?
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Then where did post #67 go?