so then what's the difference between your conspiracy theory that global warming is just a hoax to redistribute worldwide wealth, and david duke's conspiracy theory that global warming is just a hoax to redistribute worldwide wealth?
if you can explain the difference, i will stop asking why you and david duke share the same conspiracy theory.
You presume to know "my conspiracy theory". That's big (bigly?) of you, thanks.
You know David Dukes theory. Let that sink in.
Folks are as or more upset about climate change being challenged as they are about Trump being PEOTUS.
So in regards to posts made about challenging climate change, at this point what difference does it make?
I haven't seen you yet address a message, just messengers.
Do you acknowledge what Ms. Figueres and Mr. Edenhofer said?