Thanks To 'Fight For $15' Minimum Wage, McDonald's Unveils Job-Replacing Self-Service Kiosks

[UncleBuck]

Translation: Thomas Sowell is a racist.

thomas sowell is very racist against black people, just like you are.

Economist Thomas Sowell argues...

^^^^that guy, just like you, also joined a white supremacy and holocaust denial group.

so far, the two members of this forum (besides you) who have cited thomas sowell don't think it is racist to call black children "niglets", and are avowed members of white supremacy and holocaust denial groups.

you want to keep telling me how much you like thomas sowell?

 

[see4]

Forgot what it was, very high and hazy here as well and usual....you said "are your sure" and I went back, re-read and realized you were right about whatever it was.

Huh, that's a rare concession. I'll keep that in mind.

 

[see4]

Says all you need to know about pooey popsicle's 'pseudo-dad', folks:

Member Since:
Apr 5, 2013
Messages:
5,100
Likes Received:
833
Trophy Points:
178

View attachment 3848259

That blonde reminds me of my college girlfriend. she was a cheerleader. i fucked her hard. so very hard. long dick style. a true spinner that girl was.

 

[twostrokenut]

thomas sowell is very racist against black people, just like you are.



^^^^that guy, just like you, also joined a white supremacy and holocaust denial group.

so far, the two members of this forum (besides you) who have cited thomas sowell don't think it is racist to call black children "niglets", and are avowed members of white supremacy and holocaust denial groups.

you want to keep telling me how much you like thomas sowell?

Niglet is a racist reference to black kids I would not condone. What white supremacy group can you factually point out I am a member of. I mean, you seem so well researched, with screen shots and chopped quotes for every little point you try and make in accusation.

So where's your proof I joined such a group here at RIU which you keep such an adamant screenshot and post record of for such things? You made a HUGE stink about that group when it was active, where are the quotes of you calling me out at that time for being a member?

It's not there. You don't have it. I remember when that group was here, I avoided it like a month old dirty diaper.

The fact I simply do not agree with you politically is your excuse.

 

[UncleBuck]

Niglet is a racist reference to black kids I would not condone. What white supremacy group can you factually point out I am a member of. I mean, you seem so well researched, with screen shots and chopped quotes for every little point you try and make in accusation.

So where's your proof I joined such a group here at RIU which you keep such an adamant screenshot and post record of for such things? You made a HUGE stink about that group when it was active, where are the quotes of you calling me out at that time for being a member?

It's not there. You don't have it. I remember when that group was here, I avoided it like a month old dirty diaper.

The fact I simply do not agree with you politically is your excuse.

nice meltdown.

facts so far:

1) you support thomas sowell, who is racist against blacks.
2) desert dude, an admitted member of a white supremacy gorup, also supports thomas sowell.
3) mindmelted, who thinks calling black children "niglets" is not racist, also supports thomas sowell.
4) you tried to defend the white supremacy and holocaust denial group as a "free speech and debate" group.
5) and you desperately claim that you are somehow not racist despite all of this.

want me to keep going on the avowed racists who, like you, support thomas sowell?

 

[Padawanbater2]

i've defended you endlessly over what cannabineer and annie and clayton smear you with. careful with this line.

When have you defended me?

Did you even make an appearance in this thread? Seems like that've been the one to do it in seeing as TD, tty, and a handful of awesome others did

What's with the 'careful with this line' comment? Is that some sort of vague threat towards me for stating my personal opinion?

LOL. and you wonder why i am finding more disagreement with you. it's like you sold your account to someone.

taking an ages old policy like a no fly zone and implying that it is even a bad idea, much less on par with the bad idea that is letting trump play with the controls for a while, is asinine. moronic. stupid. dumber than fuck.

i'm not sure what point you are evn trying to make. i don't need to watch your video because i watched the debates. not sure why you even posted the video.

A 'no fly zone' can very much be a bad idea depending on the circumstances. Take for instance Syria; if the US imposes a 'no fly zone' over Syria, it could potentially cause tensions between the US and Russia, Russia being a strong ally and supporter of the Syrian government.

I'm lead to believe you know it could be a bad idea because you denied Clinton even said she supported the idea

I support enforcing a 'no fly zone' over an area when it makes sense;

"A 2004 Stanford University paper published in Journal of Strategic Studies, "Lessons from Iraq and Bosnia on the Theory and Practice of No-fly Zones," reviewed the effectiveness of the air-based campaigns in achieving military objectives. The paper's findings were: 1) A clear, unified command structure is essential. In Bosnia, during "Operation Deny Flight," a confusing dual-key coordination structure provided inadequate authority and resulted in air forces not being given authority to assist in key situations; 2) To avoid a "perpetual patrol problem," states must know in advance their policy objectives and the exit strategy for no-fly zones; 3) The effectiveness of no-fly zones is highly dependent on regional support. A lack of support from Turkey for the 1996 Iraq no-fly zone ultimately constrained the coalition's ability to effectively enforce it."

not really, i've pegged you as MRA for a while now. if you're not insulted by that, that also explains the nature of our developing rift.

Absolutely shocking, since when do you utilize the ad hominem attack to make a logical point?

there's that whole establishment thing again. what do you even mean by "establishment" and "elitist"?

The American political establishment is made up of a small group of people who control or influence a larger group of people through the use of political propaganda, fear, and manipulation in order to progress political goals

The American political establishment includes people like Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, James Inhofe, John Cornyn, Jeff Sessions, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, Marco Rubio.. I think you get the idea. People virtually entrenched in the political process

All of the members who make up the American political establishment are on "the same team", they share the same ideas, have the same goals, and work for their collective special interests that fund their campaigns and get them reelected. They work for corporate America, not working class people.

 

[UncleBuck]

A 'no fly zone' can very much be a bad idea depending on the circumstances. Take for instance Syria; if the US imposes a 'no fly zone' over Syria, it could potentially cause tensions between the US and Russia, Russia being a strong ally and supporter of the Syrian government.

so what?

the russians are pussies. they have one aircraft carrier, and they can't even land their planes on it.

The American political establishment includes people like Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, James Inhofe, John Cornyn, Jeff Sessions, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, Marco Rubio.. I think you get the idea. People virtually entrenched in the political process

All of the members who make up the American political establishment are on "the same team", they share the same ideas, have the same goals, and work for their collective special interests that fund their campaigns and get them reelected. They work for corporate America, not working class people.

yeah, bernie is in no way part of the establishment though. bernie magic.

and clinton and sessions are on the same team.

you've lost it.

 

[twostrokenut]

thomas sowell is very racist against black people, just like you are.

1) you support thomas sowell, who is racist against blacks.
Yes; Sowell; Fayza Rachael, Peterson, Sotamayor...the list goes on and on. So why do you have a problem with these black Americans views if you are white and it is an experience you cannot possibly relate to?
2) desert dude, an admitted member of a white supremacy gorup, also supports thomas sowell.
Who cares?
3) mindmelted, who thinks calling black children "niglets" is not racist, also supports thomas sowell.
Who cares?
4) you tried to defend the white supremacy and holocaust denial group as a "free speech and debate" group.
I remembered that group was accused of being a harbor of white supremacy on RIU, and I remembered the title of the group. It was not a defense, but a reference to the group. So the world should go around referencing books by made up titles based on what each individual takes from the content, not the actual title, legitness durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
5) and you desperately claim that you are somehow not racist despite all of this.


want me to keep going on the avowed racists who, like you, support thomas sowell?

Do whatever you'd like. Your mere presence here is evidence you won't hold to your word. But, by all means, drop some of your honesty on us.

 

[tangerinegreen555]

Do whatever you'd like. Your mere presence here is evidence you won't hold to your word. But, by all means, drop some of your honesty on us.

but, does it explain the bald spot on the back of his head?


you'II never purge that shit out of you, do you even try?

 

[Padawanbater2]

so what?

the russians are pussies. they have one aircraft carrier, and they can't even land their planes on it.

So you were wrong about Clinton's stance on a 'no fly zone' over Syria

Why is it this hard for you to admit you were wrong about something when the facts are objective?

yeah, bernie is in no way part of the establishment though.

Sanders has a net worth well below a million dollars, I think it might even be less than $500K.. While net worth isn't an absolute indicator of establishment politics, take for instance Marco Rubio's net worth of around $100,000-$400,000K, it remains a pretty good indicator of such.

When it comes to Sanders, all it really takes is a politically mindful person to discern whether or not he's a part of the political establishment. He constantly talks about reining in Wall Street, reforming campaign finance, reenacting Glass-Steagall and strengthening banking regulations, raising the minimum wage, enacting universal healthcare and universal college, investing in American infrastructure, investing in public education, advancing the science to fight climate change, etc...

So which part of that message supports a corporatist agenda? His stances conflict with the finance industry, big business, healthcare, education, and civil engineering, all the same assholes funding reelecting bids for the others. So what is it exactly that makes you believe Sanders is also some establishment shill who works for corporations instead of the American people?

and clinton and sessions are on the same team.

Team rich v. team poor;

 

[twostrokenut]

but, does it explain the bald spot on the back of his head?


you'II never purge that shit out of you, do you even try?

You're deflecting. Maybe its hereditary. At that exact moment he wasn't speaking to his recessive traits though. Unless you have successfully ID'd the "predisposed to follow organized religion" gene, which you haven't. If I had said "your thin delicate fingers visible in your one hot cunt pic you posted appear calloused, now that I know you're catholic it explains this because of the rosary beads and what not" after he admits he's Catholic this conversation wouldn't be happening and you know it.

 

[Justin-case]

So you were wrong about Clinton's stance on a 'no fly zone' over Syria

Why is it this hard for you to admit you were wrong about something when the facts are objective?

Sanders has a net worth well below a million dollars, I think it might even be less than $500K.. While net worth isn't an absolute indicator of establishment politics, take for instance Marco Rubio's net worth of around $100,000-$400,000K, it remains a pretty good indicator of such.

When it comes to Sanders, all it really takes is a politically mindful person to discern whether or not he's a part of the political establishment. He constantly talks about reining in Wall Street, reforming campaign finance, reenacting Glass-Steagall and strengthening banking regulations, raising the minimum wage, enacting universal healthcare and universal college, investing in American infrastructure, investing in public education, advancing the science to fight climate change, etc...

So which part of that message supports a corporatist agenda? His stances conflict with the finance industry, big business, healthcare, education, and civil engineering, all the same assholes funding reelecting bids for the others. So what is it exactly that makes you believe Sanders is also some establishment shill who works for corporations instead of the American people?

Team rich v. team poor;

Follow the Money: How Bernie Sanders' Campaign is One Giant Con on the American People


https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.thepeoplesview.net/main/2016/3/22/bernie-sanders-campaign-conjob-follow-the-money&ved=0ahUKEwiQwofBwePQAhVS_mMKHfxgAWoQFggjMAI&usg=AFQjCNFPZZVD8KBv74en22c_dDh45NiPYQ&sig2=KDCesC0s48pwuw22hiQ2_g

 

[twostrokenut]

There's a general consensus here that a min wage statewide in the US would even the playing field, suggesting the field is uneven, which all of us across the political spectrum could agree that it is. I certainly can. So the age old question, why not make it 30 or 100? What could it possibly harm?

@UncleBuck nice siggy:

ya people will do that.
people will also screenshot conversations which is against rules and removed.
people like to quote for posterity nothing against that though

 

[UncleBuck]

There's a general consensus here that a min wage statewide in the US would even the playing field, suggesting the field is uneven, which all of us across the political spectrum could agree that it is. I certainly can. So the age old question, why not make it 30 or 100? What could it possibly harm?

@UncleBuck nice siggy:

that has to be the most pathetic, inelegant, and obvious attempt to deflect from your racist and anti-semitic hatred that i have ever seen.

 

[UncleBuck]

but, does it explain the bald spot on the back of his head?


you'II never purge that shit out of you, do you even try?

yeah, that whole remark has everything to do with my complete lack of baldness, and nothing at all to do with me being a jew.

it's not like twopumpchump was a dedicated follower of rawn pawl, the guy who railed against jews controlling the federal reserve and said that jews were playing congress "like a cheap harmonica".

no way that guy could be a jew-hating shitbag.

 

[Lucky Luke]

There's a general consensus here that a min wage statewide in the US would even the playing field, suggesting the field is uneven, which all of us across the political spectrum could agree that it is. I certainly can. So the age old question, why not make it 30 or 100? What could it possibly harm?

@UncleBuck nice siggy:

Because then it would not be keeping pace with inflation it would be causing inflation.....simple high school economics.

If min wages keep pace with inflation like its ment to (yes, its ment to) it means people have disposable income. This creates spending, this creates jobs, which then create spending, this creates new business which creates jobs. All those people with jobs create tax revenue, which creates govt spending, which creates jobs....etc etc etc.

In a resession the govt spends money (even if it has to borrow it) on "works", why is that? To create spending..to create jobs....Tis the same deal. Spending is what the economy thrives and needs and for that we need people having disposable income.

 

[Padawanbater2]

Follow the Money

OK, let's follow the money...

On the flip side, a lack of money can drive people to despair. Those that struggle to make money are often forced into dire situations as not everyone has a close friend or family member they can rely on in times of need. A lack of money due to poor financial management or losing a job can ruin lives. People end up on the streets, doing anything they can to survive. Some sell drugs. Others turn to prostitution or crime. There are those that spend their days panhandling, hoping that a stranger walking by will be kind enough to provide them with enough money to eat for the day. For people who have fallen on hard times financially, they yearn for any opportunity to get back on their feet and they will go to great lengths to do so.

Bernie Sanders is one of those people.

Right, so Mr. LaFauci begins by comparing Sanders to drug dealers, prostitutes and outright criminals because he grew up lower-middle-class and claims people under such circumstances will "do anything they can to survive". The progressive position on both the war on drugs and prostitution is resoundingly "legalize", and LaFauci is trying to draw a comparison between the two in a negative light to make Sanders look bad for being willing to "do anything he can to survive". In what galaxy is that a negative?

For roughly seventeen years, Sanders lived in small town Vermont before he entered politics. Despite being a presidential candidate, there has been no mainstream media coverage or questions about this time in Sanders' life.

Mainstream media coverage or questions about this time in Sanders' life

What little we do know paints the picture of a man who struggled to determine just how to enact his version of what he saw as a need "political revolution" in this country. While working on that aspiration, Sanders had to pay the bills so he engaged in a variety of jobs such as a teacher, hospital aid, nonprofit worker, carpenter, and freelance writer. He was married and then divorced two years later. He then had a son out of wedlock and shared custody with the child's mother. His friends recalled that he lived in squalor and often had no electricity as he struggled to pay his bills. Some of them remarked that they actually didn't know what Sanders did to earn a living at various points of his life. It was not until he was elected mayor of Burlington in 1981 where Sanders earned his first significant yearly paycheck of $33,100 a year.

Wait, wait, wait, wait.. So LaFauci is to have us believe Sanders was this reject who worked crappy jobs like being a teacher, working in a hospital, and doing construction just to make ends meet.. but then he went from that low, scum life to being elected the 4 term mayor of Burlington, VT, defeating 5 term incumbent Gordon Paquette..

From that point forward, Bernie Sanders finally had money. His paychecks increased significantly once he was elected to the House of Representatives in 1990 and the Senate in 2007. Yet, currently Sanders' net worth is listed as only $528,014. He doesn't own stock, he has anywhere between $25,000-$65,000 of credit card debt to his name, and his assets are all listed in his wife, Jane's name. Add to that the fact that Sanders has only released his tax returns for a single year and the fact that his wife Jane received $200,000 a year as president of Burlington College and one can see that Sanders has a lot more wealth than he is letting on. In fact, political consultant James O'Brien has made a convincing case that Sanders may very well be a millionaire himself. Should that be the case, it would explain why Sanders keeps his financial assets in his wife's name and hasn't released his tax forms from years he wasn't running for president a la Mitt Romney. How would his legions of followers feel knowing that the man railing against the millionaires and billionaires is a millionaire himself?

So LaFauci begins again by making an unfounded claim; "Sanders hasn't released his taxes, so he must be a millionaire just like the kind he rails against!!!" Then bases an argument off said unfounded claim; "What would his supporters think of him then!!?"

I'm not interested in entertaining unfounded claims

Something just isn't right.

Unfathomably spectacular journalism right there

Not only is the money coming in questionable

I think LaFauci should take a look at the Clinton Foundation if he's looking for questionable contributions to political candidates..

Tad Devine

"He was also the chief strategist for Bernie Sanders' 2016 presidential campaign. He has worked on eleven winning campaigns for President and Prime Minister in Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East, as well as seventeen winning U.S. Senate races."

Devine's history speaks for itself

But that was always the intent, we were simply too blind to see it.

Because Bernie Sanders' brand of socialism has always been to take away the wealth from those at the top. Having lived in squalor for all those years, Sanders never saw himself as part of that group even though now he very well could be a millionaire.

Yeah, same old talking points from Republicans. Bernie is just jealous of the wealthy people in this country, I mean, it has nothing to do with the fact that more than 50% of Americans make less than $30,000/year, or that 76% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck, or that corporate taxes have decreased by more than 20% since 1960 which means the poor and middle-class have had to pick up the slack, or that the real minimum wage hasn't risen since 1968, or that the costs of healthcare and college have risen faster than than almost any other expenses in this country. No, no, that couldn't be it. That's all just socialist bullshit..

Yet, even as the campaign is losing and heading for an inevitable defeat, Sanders is continuing to raise funds in an effort to convince his legion of supporters that victory is still possible even though he is not raising any money for down-ballot Democratic candidates that would actually be the ones to actually put his political "revolution" in place.

Published March 23, 2016 before the DNC leakes were published. Gloating about a rigged primary

For Bernie Sanders supporters, the concept of socialism was about taking money away from those at the top and redistributing it to those in need. Yet Bernie Sanders has done exactly the opposite: he has taken money from those at the bottom and redistributed it to those at the top, including himself and his closest friends.

Rofl

 

[Justin-case]

OK, let's follow the money...

Right, so Mr. LaFauci begins by comparing Sanders to drug dealers, prostitutes and outright criminals because he grew up lower-middle-class and claims people under such circumstances will "do anything they can to survive". The progressive position on both the war on drugs and prostitution is resoundingly "legalize", and LaFauci is trying to draw a comparison between the two in a negative light to make Sanders look bad for being willing to "do anything he can to survive". In what galaxy is that a negative?

Mainstream media coverage or questions about this time in Sanders' life

Wait, wait, wait, wait.. So LaFauci is to have us believe Sanders was this reject who worked crappy jobs like being a teacher, working in a hospital, and doing construction just to make ends meet.. but then he went from that low, scum life to being elected the 4 term mayor of Burlington, VT, defeating 5 term incumbent Gordon Paquette..


So LaFauci begins again by making an unfounded claim; "Sanders hasn't released his taxes, so he must be a millionaire just like the kind he rails against!!!" Then bases an argument off said unfounded claim; "What would his supporters think of him then!!?"

I'm not interested in entertaining unfounded claims

Unfathomably spectacular journalism right there

I think LaFauci should take a look at the Clinton Foundation if he's looking for questionable contributions to political candidates..

"He was also the chief strategist for Bernie Sanders' 2016 presidential campaign. He has worked on eleven winning campaigns for President and Prime Minister in Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East, as well as seventeen winning U.S. Senate races."

Devine's history speaks for itself


Yeah, same old talking points from Republicans. Bernie is just jealous of the wealthy people in this country, I mean, it has nothing to do with the fact that more than 50% of Americans make less than $30,000/year, or that 76% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck, or that corporate taxes have decreased by more than 20% since 1960 which means the poor and middle-class have had to pick up the slack, or that the real minimum wage hasn't risen since 1968, or that the costs of healthcare and college have risen faster than than almost any other expenses in this country. No, no, that couldn't be it. That's all just socialist bullshit..

Published March 23, 2016 before the DNC leakes were published. Gloating about a rigged primary

Rofl

You left out the part about 800k being paid to the DC consulting firm

 

[Justin-case]

Tad Devine who worked on Sanders' 1996 congressional campaign as well as his 2006 senatorial campaign. Devine has been a lifelong Washington insider having worked for a law firm that previously represented Monsanto as well has having worked on national Democratic campaigns for Michael Dukakis, Al Gore, and John Kerry. While Sanders' campaign manager Jeff Weaver netted a cool $9,900 for his efforts for the month, Devine earned a whopping $810,000 for his consulting firm Devine, Mulvey, and Longabaugh Inc. For those keeping score at home that's 30,000 $27 donations sent to Bernie to help defeat the millions and billionaires of the establishment in Washington, D.C.

@Padawanbater2 I guess you can try to argue this, but I just think Bernie isn't as clean as you make him out to be

 

[UncleBuck]

So you were wrong about Clinton's stance on a 'no fly zone' over Syria

how the fuck do you get there?

she proposed a no fly zone. not controversial. done all the time. russia knows they would be crushed by us in any war.

you bought into russian propaganda, sucks to be you.

Sanders has a net worth well below a million dollars

so what?

paul ryan is only worth half a million. my wife and i are worth more. yet we are both for everything you listed. you know who else was?

hillary fucking clinton, you immature little shit.

grow the fuck up already.

the green font is so goddamn childish and annoying too.