Make Liberalism Great Again

see4 said:
Didn't make sense in ~1803, doesn't make sense now. But using the logic you proposed, California electoral votes should be roughly 4 times bigger than it is currently.

They gerrymandered back then and have been doing every since.

Remove the concept of gerrymandering and manipulating the vote and have every vote count.

The only reason you won't go for that is because 'your team would lose'. For you, and people like you, it's about being on the winning team. For me its about improving America and everyone who participates in its society.
Click to expand...

It's retarded. If there are more liberal people in the country, then our representation in DC should reflect that. What does it matter where they live? It's already skewed to the right in the senate with each state having equal representation regardless of population.

There are clearly more people that lean to the left here as evidenced by six of the last seven general elections seeing more people cast votes for the Dem nominee, and yet we have a republican in the White House, republican control of the senate, republican control of the house, and a Supreme Court that will lean heavily to the right for generations to come. How is that fair and democratic representation??
 
see4 said:
Didn't make sense in ~1803, doesn't make sense now. But using the logic you proposed, California electoral votes should be roughly 4 times bigger than it is currently.

They gerrymandered back then and have been doing every since.

Remove the concept of gerrymandering and manipulating the vote and have every vote count.

The only reason you won't go for that is because 'your team would lose'. For you, and people like you, it's about being on the winning team. For me its about improving America and everyone who participates in its society.
Click to expand...
@Flaming Pie is a welfare recipient whose husband was kicked out of the military. She has kids she can't afford and votes against her very own interest. Basically she is dumb as fuck and useless. Her only claim to fame is her ability to suck a cock.
 
see4 said:
Didn't make sense in ~1803, doesn't make sense now. But using the logic you proposed, California electoral votes should be roughly 4 times bigger than it is currently.

They gerrymandered back then and have been doing every since.

Remove the concept of gerrymandering and manipulating the vote and have every vote count.

The only reason you won't go for that is because 'your team would lose'. For you, and people like you, it's about being on the winning team. For me its about improving America and everyone who participates in its society.
Click to expand...
Population of the state determines its representation in house. Every state gets 2 in the senate. The number of representatives a state has is equal to its the number of its Electoral votes.
 
Last edited:
st0wandgrow said:
It's retarded. If there are more liberal people in the country, then our representation in DC should reflect that. What does it matter where they live? It's already skewed to the right in the senate with each state having equal representation regardless of population.

There are clearly more people that lean to the left here as evidenced by six of the last seven general elections seeing more people cast votes for the Dem nominee, and yet we have a republican in the White House, republican control of the senate, republican control of the house, and a Supreme Court that will lean heavily to the right for generations to come. How is that fair and democratic representation??
Click to expand...

That's why you must vote, with Trump presidency being the end result here..sitting it out has consequences that you must be willing to deal with, too.

7M didn't vote..that's MILLION.
 
schuylaar said:
Really? tell us more..
Click to expand...
Edited for clarity. 2 in senate for all and population based in house.

You cannot change the Electoral College without two thirds of congress and three quarters of the states.

You need to know the rules of the game if you want to win it.
 
Flaming Pie said:
It depends on what they do. If they implement trumps policy that will be good. If not he may actually fire them. The guy went through 3 campaign managers and kicked chris christie off the transition team.
Click to expand...

they kicked chris christie off because he put jared kushner's daddy in prison for illegal dealings in his real estate scam empire.

btw, jared kushner is a fucking slumlord.

so much for draining the swamp.

Flaming Pie said:
bernie was threatened...wikileaks
Click to expand...

you're literally retarded.
 
st0wandgrow said:
Dr West is 100% right. If Bernie folds and starts cozying up to the corporate elite, the Democratic Party will be on the outside looking in for a very long time.

I will be so disappointed in him if this happens. I'm already questioning his alegiences after he endorsed Hillary.
Click to expand...

bernie is a has been. never was in the democratic party, doesn't represent the democratic party today, won't tomorrow.
 
Flaming Pie said:
So you just think he won't make use of his ability? Your comment seemed to imply you thought using his ability would be turning the presidency into a reality show. I took that as a negative view of dismissing/firing someone who isn't performing the tasks assigned to them.
Click to expand...

It was indeed meant to be general commentary on the new state of the American Presidency.

First Bonzo went to Washington...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top