How Israel takes care of its friends, the Palestinians

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Quite different to operate a business that provides a service in a country, then to accept millions of government money from that country. (not to mention during periods where those countries are trying to get deals with SoS)

They are not comparable. Again, let me know if his charity starts accepting millions and millions direct from the government of Qatar.
first, his "charity", which admitted to embezzlement, cannot take any donations because it would be illegal for them to do so. dumbass.

second, the clinton foundation never accepted "millions and millions direct from the government of qatar", you retard.

third, trump's businesses in qatar and saudi arabia provide money to those governments. they do not take money from those governments and then use it to save lives elsewhere, moron.

the fact that you are even trying to defend this rather than simply admit how stupid you are is grand. i can beat you over the head with your own words as long as you refuse to yield to your own idiocy.
 

srh88

Well-Known Member
first, his "charity", which admitted to embezzlement, cannot take any donations because it would be illegal for them to do so. dumbass.

second, the clinton foundation never accepted "millions and millions direct from the government of qatar", you retard.

third, trump's businesses in qatar and saudi arabia provide money to those governments. they do not take money from those governments and then use it to save lives elsewhere, moron.

the fact that you are even trying to defend this rather than simply admit how stupid you are is grand. i can beat you over the head with your own words as long as you refuse to yield to your own idiocy.
go easy on her.. shes obviously a pathetic retard
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
There's no irony here. Campaign contributions and business profits are two separate things.

Prove she operated businesses there or that he accepted campaign contributions from there and then you are on the same page.
Usually you're better at trolling but that kinda sucked.
 

srh88

Well-Known Member
There's no irony here. Campaign contributions and business profits are two separate things.

Prove she operated businesses there or that he accepted campaign contributions from there and then you are on the same page.
Usually you're better at trolling but that kinda sucked.
youre right.. they are separate.. business there, helps their economy. taking money from them.. well is just taking money from them. so like pie was saying, its evil to accept money from them.. isnt it worse to give them money?
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
youre right.. they are separate.. business there, helps their economy. taking money from them.. well is just taking money from them. so like pie was saying, its evil to accept money from them.. isnt it worse to give them money?
I see what you're saying but aren't we supposed to interact by trade? Trade/service same thing imho.

So that's symbolic, kind of a non-intervention principle. Campaign contribution; same symbolism your reckon?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
There's no irony here. Campaign contributions and business profits are two separate things.

Prove she operated businesses there or that he accepted campaign contributions from there and then you are on the same page.
Usually you're better at trolling but that kinda sucked.
like always, you have it completely backwards, trailer boy.

the clinton foundation received donations from some of these countries. the clinton foundation spent it on life saving AIDS medications, empowering women worldwide, and everything else their foundation does. the countries got nothing back in return.

trump does business in these countries. the countries make money from him, and he profits from doing business in these countries which @Flaming Pie says fund ISIS, al qaeda, and other "islamic terrorist groups".

i would not expect a penny mooching cuck like yourself to understand the difference, and you did not disappoint. boy.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
With less of their lands and fewer rights every year whether they're Israeli citizens or not.

They aren't an infestation.
they absolutely are not an infestation, they are an existential threat. they held an election and chose a terrorist who says israel has no right to exist and should be wiped off the face of the earth. they want nothing less than extermination of the jews.

hard to be good neighbors with people like that.
 

socalcoolmx

Well-Known Member
they absolutely are not an infestation, they are an existential threat. they held an election and chose a terrorist who says israel has no right to exist and should be wiped off the face of the earth. they want nothing less than extermination of the jews.

hard to be good neighbors with people like that.
Hard to be a good neighbor when your land is being occupied what should they do just give up all the land
 
the clinton foundation received donations from some of these countries. the clinton foundation spent it on life saving AIDS medications, empowering women worldwide, and everything else their foundation does. the countries got nothing back in return.

trump does business in these countries
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
they absolutely are not an infestation, they are an existential threat. they held an election and chose a terrorist who says israel has no right to exist and should be wiped off the face of the earth. they want nothing less than extermination of the jews.

hard to be good neighbors with people like that.
Hmmmm. You're leaving an awful lot out.

But to directly address this, perhaps their point is that ALL of present day Israel belonged to someone else before 1948, and was taken from them by force, with the ongoing assistance of powers like the US and Britain. History would support such a view.

Jews have a right to exist, but that doesn't trump the rights of those who already lived there.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
maybe they should elect someone who says jews have the right to exist. that might be a good start.
And when they went to the peace table they were rebuffed. Israel has repeatedly demonstrated that it doesn't WANT peace, because the ongoing conflict is great cover for continuing their campaign of human rights violations.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Hmmmm. You're leaving an awful lot out.

But to directly address this, perhaps their point is that ALL of present day Israel belonged to someone else before 1948, and was taken from them by force, with the ongoing assistance of powers like the US and Britain. History would support such a view.

Jews have a right to exist, but that doesn't trump the rights of those who already lived there.
on the contrary, the right to exist is above all else.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Well, since America was instrumental in the creation of the Jewish State, perhaps we owe the Palestinians a new homeland.

I suggest Kentucky.
i'm for a 12 state solution, give each side their own "homeland" on all 6 continents.
 
Top