will trump condemn his neo-nazi followers as strongly as he condemns rosie o'donnell?

RickyBobby26

Well-Known Member
for what?

unlike trump, she has never had to plead guilty to any crime, settle any crime, nor has she ever been indicted or arraigned for any crime.

unlike trump.

do your klan buddies have an after-thanksgiving rally?
No. Actually, my multi-racial extended family of various cultures and sexual orientations is having dinner together tomorrow night.
 

RickyBobby26

Well-Known Member
you are a retarded person. literally. you are literally retarded.

"our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case"
If you could debate as good as you can call names, you'd be a supreme court justice by now. But the truth is, your posts lack any bite unless you include some name-calling.

Your bullying is so 1970s.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
If you could debate as good as you can call names, you'd be a supreme court justice by now. But the truth is, your posts lack any bite unless you include some name-calling.

Your bullying is so 1970s.
there's nothing to debate here.

you are deluded and live in a false reality where you think hillary is a criminal despite the complete lack of evidence for it, yet in your stupid mind trump is not a criminal despite just settling a fraud and racketeering case for $25 million, just admitted to embezzlement from his own charitable foundation (which is now defunct because they were never set up to take donations in the first place), has a case for child rape coming up on december 16th, and 73 other current pending lawsuits.
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Two reasons he shouldn't go after her:

1. Her defeat by Trump is more punishment for her than any prison sentence ever could be.

2. Prosecuting her would be a huge distraction that no one needs. It could linger for years in the courts.
But what about the harm she will do to the country? How can you condone letting such a dangerous criminal - the most corrupt politician EVER - roam the street because it is a distraction? Are you insane? Being defeated by TRUMP! is not going to bring justice to the dozens of families affected by the murders she committed.
 

Growdict

Well-Known Member
Two reasons he shouldn't go after her:

1. Her defeat by Trump is more punishment for her than any prison sentence ever could be.

2. Prosecuting her would be a huge distraction that no one needs. It could linger for years in the courts.
1. She isnt guilty of anything. Unlike trump that just admitted fraud university
2. Losing the prosecution would prove the russian propaganda designedto throw the election worked
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
No, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn last weekend.

Trump isn't going after Hillary in any way. Actually, my hope is that Obama will pardon her; that would brand her for all time as a political criminal. She could never live down a pardon.
So you are not disappointed that there will be no special investigation ipresident?

This was clearly a campaign promise.

prom·ise
ˈpräməs/
noun
  1. 1.
    a declaration or assurance that one will do a particular thing or that a particular thing will happen.
    "what happened to all those firm promises of support?"
    synonyms: word (of honor), assurance, pledge, vow, guarantee, oath, bond, undertaking, agreement, commitment, contract, covenant
    "you broke your promise"
verb
  1. 1.
    assure someone that one will definitely do, give, or arrange something; undertake or declare that something will happen.
    "he promised to forward my mail"
    synonyms: give one's word, swear, pledge, vow, undertake, guarantee, contract, engage, give an assurance, commit oneself, bind oneself, swear/take an oath, covenant;
    archaicplight
    "she promised to go"
  2. 2.
    give good grounds for expecting (a particular occurrence or situation).
    "forthcoming concerts promise a feast of music from around the world"
    synonyms: indicate, lead one to expect, point to, denote, signify, be a sign of, be evidence of, give hope of, bespeak, presage, augur, herald, bode, portend; More
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Two reasons he shouldn't go after her:

1. Her defeat by Trump is more punishment for her than any prison sentence ever could be.

2. Prosecuting her would be a huge distraction that no one needs. It could linger for years in the courts.
1. Then that makes him a fucking LIAR, RickyBobby!

2. Very sweet, but how does Trump know the equivalency of punishment?

3. In your opinion, what type of punishment would you like to meter out to those seeking abortion?..lets see, Trump did say that too..

 
Last edited:

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
But what about the harm she will do to the country? How can you condone letting such a dangerous criminal - the most corrupt politician EVER - roam the street because it is a distraction? Are you insane? Being defeated by TRUMP! is not going to bring justice to the dozens of families affected by the murders she committed.
And animal..don't forget the cat:wink:

They were calling for her head..and now..?

This is so fucking rich, I can't stop laughing:fire:
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
1. She isnt guilty of anything. Unlike trump that just admitted fraud university
2. Losing the prosecution would prove the russian propaganda designedto throw the election worked
There was no admission of guilt.

It was a settlement out of court with no wrong doing.
 
Top