That's not what the text says. It states:
AUMA 11362.3.f
“Nothing in section 11362.1 shall be construed or interpreted to amend, repeal, affect, restrict or preempt: (i) Laws pertaining to the Compassionate Use Act of 1996.”
Legalazation : Auma 2016 and MMRSA
- Thread starter TWS
- Start date
AUMA 11362.3.f
“Nothing in section 11362.1 shall be construed or interpreted to amend, repeal, affect, restrict or preempt: (i) Laws pertaining to the Compassionate Use Act of 1996.”
a mongo frog
Well-Known Member
So that means medical rights from 1996 Act are not harmed by 64? Sorry, just all this stuff is confusing to read. I voted against 64, but now as time went on since the election I feel that I was wrong in voting no. Maybe i should of been more aware of what was really written. Im so closed mined........... So sorry to everyone. Its usually flooded now, wtf is going on? Everyone is getting ganja cuz its legal? No one is scared? This is incredible!!!!!!!!!!
That's exactly what it means.
SabrinaCannalina
Well-Known Member
I am very curious to see if Trump lets Sessions off his leash or keeps him tied up in the name of profit and taxes.Jeff Sessions is trumps new USAG......best of luck folks
As for AUMA... now that it's passed I will work with it as best I can and focus on the good parts of the new law.. Hopefully the licenses won't have astronomical price tags or be limited to cronies of those who campaigned for it.
doublejj
Well-Known Member
to say I'm "curious" to see that happens is a major understatement.....I'm worried about what the new AG will do with pot.
SabrinaCannalina
Well-Known Member
My big question is, how much are the licenses going to cost?
potroastV2
Well-Known Member
Marijuana consumers in California are already benefiting from the success of Prop 64. Read this:
Thousands of CA marijuana prisoners being released
Thousands of CA marijuana prisoners being released
SabrinaCannalina
Well-Known Member
No one said people wouldn't benefit, only that this bill had flaws.
potroastV2
Well-Known Member
So do you, but we still let you post here.
The difference is that your flaws will remain even after AUMA is improved.
SabrinaCannalina
Well-Known Member
If my half dozen posts has offended you to the point where you have to insult your membership why not just ban me or delete the posts? At no point did I insult you. I could see if I was some long time member, but to insult me simply because I disagreed with you? That's low and childish.
potroastV2
Well-Known Member
I'm sorry that you took it as an insult. It was obviously a light-hearted comment, admittedly at your expense, but solely to make you smile.
SabrinaCannalina
Well-Known Member
You should stick to running web forums and activism. Because you're not funny. Your delivery sucks.
potroastV2
Well-Known Member
Well, it would appear that I have been schooled by an overly-sensitive young Woman.
But was I?
But was I?
SabrinaCannalina
Well-Known Member
You're really effing weird. I'm not sure what your issue is or what I did to garner your negative attention. If I could block you I would.
Again, You're the one who started with the insults, then when called on it played it off as a joke Seriously, I have no idea what I said. I guess you are trying to get back at me or be a bully because I voted no. <shrug>
Again, You're the one who started with the insults, then when called on it played it off as a joke Seriously, I have no idea what I said. I guess you are trying to get back at me or be a bully because I voted no. <shrug>
LOL way to paraphrase Winston ChurchillSo do you, but we still let you post here.
The difference is that your flaws will remain even after AUMA is improved.
I don't think he was insulting you it was just a paraphrase of a Churchill quote. Meh what do I know I'm pretty fucked up most of the time.
