why be happy about having Trump?

twostrokenut said:
Ohh introduce the race card, best way to win the argument.

lunatic-progressives-losing-debate-use-race-card.jpg
Click to expand...

"White nationalist" ... Ohhhh You Pulled The Race Card!! Ahhh Stupid Progressives!! Those Libtards always playing the race card!!

That's what you sounds like. Literally.
 
see4 said:
I own [and love my] guns and want a small government. I'm not a progressive. And you are blatantly retarded.
Click to expand...

You want a federal government that tells States what to do "with an underlying set of laws, guidelines and programs drafted by the federal government."

Yet you want "a small government" and presumably you expect to retain all your rights under a Democracy.
 
twostrokenut said:
So what are you proposing exactly in your Article Five Convention?
Click to expand...
No need to ratify, as Article V only covers state representation. Article V I don't think covers electors, I believe that is under Article III. In that I would ratify the clause having anything to do with electors and allow each vote to count.

Edit: I think it's Article II. I will have to brush up on my Constitutional law.
 
see4 said:
No need to ratify, as Article V only covers state representation. Article V I don't think covers electors, I believe that is under Article III. In that I would ratify the clause having anything to do with electors and allow each vote to count.

Edit: I think it's Article II. I will have to brush up on my Constitutional law.
Click to expand...

Dude, DUDE, DUDE. Article V covers ratification of changes. You need 2/3 house and senate or 2/3 convention.
 
Last edited:
see4 said:
I don't know man, what's your point in asking that? I'm not concerned about the "how", I'm concerned about the "what" and "why".
Click to expand...

Aside from the obviousness of not actually asking anything...apply that logic quoted above to fishing, how many fish you reckon you will eat.
 
twostrokenut said:
Apply that to fishing, how many fish you reckon you will eat.
Click to expand...

Ok, well since I know how to fish and hunt, I reckon I will eat as many fish as I catch.

But getting back to your leading question. What is your point in asking that? I'm not concerned about the "how", I'm concerned about the "what" and "why". I thought I was pretty clear on that.
 
twostrokenut said:
Apply that to fishing, how many fish you reckon you will eat.
Click to expand...

speaking of fishing, have you and the "heil hitler" tattoo buddy had any more totally heterosexual experiences together lately?

ya know, just two neo-nazis, out on a boat, showing each other their skin...that kind of thing?
 
see4 said:
Ok, well since I know how to fish and hunt, I reckon I will eat as many fish as I catch.

But getting back to your leading question. What is your point in asking that? I'm not concerned about the "how", I'm concerned about the "what" and "why". I thought I was pretty clear on that.
Click to expand...

So you're just a philosopher on this issue. I see. Just trying to understand your position.
 
twostrokenut said:
Aside from the obviousness of not actually asking anything...apply that logic quoted above to fishing, how many fish you reckon you will eat.
Click to expand...
You really should calm down, I can tell your becoming agitated.
twostrokenut said:
So you're just a philosopher on this issue. I see. Just trying to understand your position.
Click to expand...
Aren't we all? Or am I in the presence of a high ranking state or federal representative?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top