'The Irony Is Delicious..'

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Are people still bitching about trump not paying taxes? I don't understand this at all. The same people spend their breath calling people names and insulting folks by calling them idiots and stupid. Maybe that's just a bit ironic.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with not paying taxes as long as you do it legally. In fact, it's so legal that accountants and businesses like H&R Block are in existence solely because they do whatever they can do so you only have to pay the least amount of taxes possible. Why would he pay taxes on shit if he could legally not? It's part of taxes, and write offs and loopholes are legal even if it angers you that he did what all the rest of us try to do every single year. Don't like it? Change the tax laws, don't get pissed when someone plays the game the way it's intended to be played.
You're not understanding that to get $2 more per person, per month food stamps..what had to be given up..additionally this is why campaign reform is necessary and lobbying should be outlawed.

One man, one vote, no matter how much money you have..our forefathers specifically wanted this.
 

greasemonkeymann

Well-Known Member
First, a daisy cutter is nowhere near as powerful as a fission bomb. By several orders of magnitude. That's not even counting radiation poisoning.

Second, America has done many fusion bomb tests and the world has survived. What's not survivable is a serious exchange of warheads.

Third, a nuclear war would be rough on one's stock portfolio so we try to shovel money at world leaders who threaten to to use them. See our foreign policy with nuclear nations like Israel, India and North Korea.

I don't think even the Chump would try it.
first, you are fuckin-a right i was wrong.
In fact, heres a cool comparison showing just how full of shit I was.

http://www.isequal.com/father_of_all_bombs/father_of_all_bombs_hiroshima_little_boy_atomic_bomb.shtml

I was somehow mixing up/thinking the new MOAB and FOAB, and maybe magical leprechauns or Santa's sleigh with Trump at the helm, or something.. not sure.. could have been unicorns armed with enriched uranium25...

and of course I wasn't considering nuclear fallout, that's my point, the fallout from a conventional warhead is MUCH more than the experiments, not even close, not to mention depending on the warhead it's exploded in the air, not in the ground where the radiation is a lil more "safe", and also they change to a lead tamper as opposed to a uranium one, limiting fallout, I think Russia was the ones to do that (thank god, considering the amount of testing they do)

My point was that the fallout from ONE warhead is enough to ruin the world as we know it

Not to mention that it's never just one warhead, if one goes off?
there would be retaliation.
Trump I don't trust to be diplomatic.
Do we need him angering nuclear capable countries with less than "normal" leaders (talking about YOU Kim Jong)


For the record I get to inhale lots of harmful emissions at my shop, so I blame that and the Trump stress..
Shit i'm lucky if I get the damn zipper in the front of my pants
 
Last edited:

see4

Well-Known Member
So...what was dumb about my comment? Did you not watch the news at all the last few months?
Typical. Say something stupid then deny anything was said at all or deny what was said was not idiotic and avoid discussing the content of what was said. Please explain to me "Obama phones".
 

Rrog

Well-Known Member
I'm curious, what would the protests be about for Hillary.

I've got my reasons why I don't like her, but I'm curious why the rest of the country hates her.
Sounds like inviting a floodgate to open, but my personal beef is she's a 1% criminal. Good-ol'-boy club lifelong member. She would have been made wealthier after another run thru the white house. She allows arab influence in exchange for $$. She worked with the DNC to oust Bernie. Crooked shit
 

greasemonkeymann

Well-Known Member
Sounds like inviting a floodgate to open, but my personal beef is she's a 1% criminal. Good-ol'-boy club lifelong member. She would have been made wealthier after another run thru the white house. She allows arab influence in exchange for $$. She worked with the DNC to oust Bernie. Crooked shit
that reason alone is why she's a cunt.
but her being a cunt is waaaaay "safer" than Trump being an childish asshole with no experience in politics.
Maybe it's because I come from a profession that requires skill and knowledge?
or maybe it's because i'm logical, but i'd prefer to hire someone that at least had a clue on how shit works rather than someone off the street.
Listening to Trump talk about politics (or just talk in general) and it is VERY clearly shown, his ineptitude at simple understanding on how shit works.

I understand people want change..

Heres the analogy I think of, you are on a bus, with a driver that is not driving the way you like (Obama), everyone is complaining..
So you have an old woman (clinton)that knows how to drive the bus, but you KNOW she'll be less than perfect, driving slow, not changing much from the first driver, and/or what not.
and on the other hand you have a mouthy 16 yr old kid (guess who?)in the back riling people up, stating that he can drive the bus faster with better gas mileage, better reliability, safer, etc.
But he's never driven a bus before, and doesn't have a license.. nor does he know anything about engines..
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
first, you are fuckin-a right i was wrong.
In fact, heres a cool comparison showing just how full of shit I was.

http://www.isequal.com/father_of_all_bombs/father_of_all_bombs_hiroshima_little_boy_atomic_bomb.shtml

I was somehow mixing up/thinking the new MOAB and FOAB, and maybe magical leprechauns or Santa's sleigh with Trump at the helm, or something.. not sure.. could have been unicorns armed with enriched uranium25...

and of course I wasn't considering nuclear fallout, that's my point, the fallout from a conventional warhead is MUCH more than the experiments, not even close, not to mention depending on the warhead it's exploded in the air, not in the ground where the radiation is a lil more "safe", and also they change to a lead tamper as opposed to a uranium one, limiting fallout, I think Russia was the ones to do that (thank god, considering the amount of testing they do)

My point was that the fallout from ONE warhead is enough to ruin the world as we know it

Not to mention that it's never just one warhead, if one goes off?
there would be retaliation.
Trump I don't trust to be diplomatic.
Do we need him angering nuclear capable countries with less than "normal" leaders (talking about YOU Kim Jong)


For the record I get to inhale lots of harmful emissions at my shop, so I blame that and the Trump stress..
Shit i'm lucky if I get the damn zipper in the front of my pants
Ground burst fission bombs would be much worse than air burst in terms of radioactivity, because all that dirt is irradiated, pulverized and tossed into the stratosphere where it can contaminate air and water for years, worldwide. U-238 is enriched for fissile applications. U-235 is what you dig out of the ground and process for nuclear power. I'm still not sure exactly WTF 'depleted' uranium is, but I am sure every artillery shell of it we fire creates an instant Superfund site.

I studied all this as a teenager when my father was at State.

By the way, the fallout from Fukushima was greater than all previous human caused radioactive incidents COMBINED; to include testing, accidents on land and at sea, Chernobyl, and contamination associated with mining uranium to begin with. And I guarantee you have already ingested some.

I'm quibbling with your details and I know this. You're still spot on with the big picture.

There are checks against the executive's unilateral use of nuclear force. The Chump will test them.

I'm a ray of sunshine this morning, aren't I?

LMAO!
 

see4

Well-Known Member
Sounds like inviting a floodgate to open, but my personal beef is she's a 1% criminal. Good-ol'-boy club lifelong member. She would have been made wealthier after another run thru the white house. She allows arab influence in exchange for $$. She worked with the DNC to oust Bernie. Crooked shit
I'm good with that. Valid arguments. Though the wealthy thing is not something I dislike her for. I don't care if she's a 1% or not. But taking money from Saudi influence and doing what she did to Bernie with Wasserman-Shultz is not good.
 

greasemonkeymann

Well-Known Member
. I'm still not sure exactly WTF 'depleted' uranium is, but I am sure every artillery shell of it we fire creates an instant Superfund site.



I'm a ray of sunshine this morning, aren't I?

LMAO!
hah, me too, I was an 80's kid, so I was simultaneously horrified and fascinated by nuclear fission/fusion, now that I know the answer to
depleted uranium is the byproduct of making weapon-enriched uranium
the difference between a nuclear powered country versus a nuclear powered country that's weaponizing uranium

The reason I know the answer to that is cuz I watched a show on what the U.N/USA was looking for in Iraq yrs ago
they were specifically looking for uranium 235.
Oh and don't sweat your mood man, yesterday I was a nervous lil bitch
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
I'm good with that. Valid arguments. Though the wealthy thing is not something I dislike her for. I don't care if she's a 1% or not. But taking money from Saudi influence and doing what she did to Bernie with Wasserman-Shultz is not good.
"Not good"??

How about treason, for tampering with the People's Right to choose their leaders? People need to go to PRISON for this, not poor fucking pot farmers!
 

see4

Well-Known Member
"Not good"??

How about treason, for tampering with the People's Right to choose their leaders? People need to go to PRISON for this, not poor fucking pot farmers!
Since when is it treason to send emails back and forth to people saying they'd like to try and end someone's career? You'll need to explain that to me. Does the first amendment not apply to some people?
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
I'm curious, what would the protests be about for Hillary.

I've got my reasons why I don't like her, but I'm curious why the rest of the country hates her.
TBH I'm really curious myself why dems ARE protesting..this will not change the outcome and it's time to put on your big boy.

Of all people, while this was not what they wished, the country chose and they need to respect that..they bitch about the rightie? Take a good look in the mirror.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Since when is it treason to send emails back and forth to people saying they'd like to try and end someone's career? You'll need to explain that to me. Does the first amendment not apply to some people?
Treason is the appropriate word for the crime of tampering with the will of the People, whether in a nomination process or during the election itself. I'm not talking about emails at all but rather collusion to throw the nomination.
 
Top