"If you do not believe in climate change, you should not be allowed to hold public office"
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
The elevated levels of CO2 have been proven to come from burning of fossil fuels. Get your facts from real scientists not the ones working for the science denier lobby.
The growing of the Antarctic Ice sheet is irrelevant. The real issue of ice melt is in the melting of glaciers on land which is cause of concern due to oceans rising.
Science deniers claim NOAA manipulated data. That's a very different thing than actually manipulated data.
And that 1.7 degrees temperature rise is the fastest rise in the average world temperature going back hundreds of thousands of years. You don't understand facts even when you get them right.
I guess you don't like the fact that the OP said you are disqualified from becoming Prez. Too bad for you.
The issue isn't the earth ending or even mankind. The issue is that the shift in climate is too fast for ecosystems to adapt. Accompanied by unprecedented species die-offs are growth of undesirable simpler organisms that are no longer held in check -- like the red tide that shut down fishing along the west coast a couple of years ago. The following generations will be faced with flooding and food shortages. These aren't really something you can deny. Just facts about what will happen if the current generation doesn't take corrective action.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Facts are relevant when making public policy decisions. Has there ever been a good public policy that was based upon a lie?
doublejj
Well-Known Member
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Listen to us or its the end of the world-Jehovah's Witness.
Glaciers have been melting for 150 years. MMGW is social science, at best.
ginjawarrior
Well-Known Member
pretty colours!!fukishima radiation...
now you do know how big the pacific ocean is?
or that sea water carries uranium (you know like the radiation stuff) naturally
or have you forgotten one of the largest earthquakes and a frigging tidal wave that killed tens of thousands of people and hit one of the oldest nuclear reactors about....
and yet no one has died or will die from those pretty colours you posted
again nuclear is cleaner than you silly greens think how ever many appeals to emotion you may do.....
bluntmassa1
Well-Known Member
What's the difference? Democrats are not against oil they kill for it just as much as Republicans.
bluntmassa1
Well-Known Member
Nuclear is not as clean as wind solar or hydro power. It still pollutes can you tell me how to dispose of nuclear waste properly? Because the government just sticks it in barrels and buries it until the time comes those barrels leak and contaminate the ground water.
Interesting theory but I'm not buying.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
What was the level of CO2 250 million years ago during the time of the dinosaurs again?
Tell us more about proper drying techniques over litter boxes.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Glaciers melt. That's what they do when the temperature is above freezing and that's been going on since forever. In recent times, they are melting faster than they have been accumulating ice and sea levels are rising. What is your point?
MMGW or Making Middle Grades Work probably belongs in a different thread. Its a initiative in some education systems in the south. I'd suggest that any upgrade to your education would benefit you. Maybe you should look into a remedial class.
Why are you so interested in Jehovah's Witness mythology? That's probably grist for a different thread too. I'll grant that you know more about it than I do, so why don't you start a thread and tell me more.
Last edited:
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
it was a natural increase.
why don't you want to talk about your racist birtherism?
doublejj
Well-Known Member
Vnsmkr
Well-Known Member
fkn badass car JJ.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
The issue is that man causes climate change. That man is responsible for Global Warming insofaras your main issue is that sea levels rising and it is caused by man and this is catastrophic. You have stated as much:
The OP's video, in the first 25 seconds, CLEARLY demonstrates your religion's assertion that climate change is man made.
The issue you've stated is that mankind is responsible for causing and/or responsible for fixing the Earth's Climate and not doing so will result in disaster for Mankind. Yet out of the other side of your mouth you say the issue isn't catastrophe for the earth and has nothing to do with mankind.
Because Jehovah's witnesses, just like climate change cult members, have the same M.O. Follow us, this is the only true way, because we said so, we need money, or you're fucked.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
religion has no predictive value. science does.
you should stick to birthering the shit out of black presidents.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Oh you want to control nature, good luck.
it was a natural increase.
why don't you want to talk about your racist birtherism?
Why don't you want to talk about methane emissions and fecal/urea dissipation in your drying room?
doublejj
Well-Known Member
Science deniers are so funny...
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
like you said, it probably just naturally happened.
i'd rather talk about your racist birtherism instead. i sold that weed to three toothed, sister fucking, sheet wearing south carolinians like you years ago.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
I like the science of your car. Like the developments in 18650 batteries, which begs the question. How are you charging them?Science deniers are so funny...