So then what do you believe would disqualify someone from holding public office?
Wrong, facts are not democratic, facts are objective
empirical evidence.
The only facts relevant in any election are the ones believed by the voters.
you sound like gingrich now.
Shitheads like you just argue in circles, Andy. Facts are definitely facts, but the public should not have your opinion of "facts" imposed upon them nazi style.
Hey Pada, since you think there should be certain scientific belief requirements placed upon political candidates, then what about individual voters?
That perfectly describes your posts, which are comprised of 99.9999% bullshit.
remember that time you joined a white supremacy group?
LOL.
That's 99.9999% bullshit.
Science deniers are getting desperate when they have to so obviously cherry pick data to cast doubt on the settled science that establishes anthropogenic global warming as an urgent issue. Your clumsy attempt is really funny.
The temp data stations NASA uses. The NASA temperature data is based on NOAA GHCN (Global Historical Climatology Network) data.
There's a lot of blue there. The grey, 50% of the earth's land surface, is missing at key spots such as Greenland, Africa and Antarctica.
Na man, no Watchtower today, thanks.
That graphic you posted. Completely science denier cooked up bullshit. What you posted was intentionally cherry picked data to seemingly prove a point when in fact all it did was showed how an info graphic can be distorted in order to lie to the audience.
Dude, the earth is 1.7 degrees warmer since 1880, CO2 isn't a pollutant and mostly comes from natural sources, the Antarctic ice sheet is growing by billions of tons, man made climate change is literally a theory, polar bears are fucking and multiplying growing the population, NOAA has been caught manipulating data and scientists are demanding they remain transparent to taxpayers.
Maxsea?
