Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
they clearly say the plant will yield less both because its getting less light to convert into fuel, and it has less time to use what light it is getting. that seems to directly contradict the point
Have you witnessed noticeably decreased yields as compared to a 12/12 bloom cycle?Interesting thread. I run 10.5 hrs on time ( give or take) and 80w sq ft. Since I cut The on time the last 3 cycles my plants have finished a week or so quicker? I thought I was just learning more.
I run 10/14 a the time now on a couple regualr strains of mine. I have not noticed any less in yield and i have found that sometimes i yield more. And in all instances the plants have finished faster...Have you witnessed noticeably decreased yields as compared to a 12/12 bloom cycle?
Yeah actually using low hours is said to cause herms. That's why it may be best to use 12/12 until the last week. They wouldn't be able to crank out ripe pollen sacks in just a week I don't think. That's why my plan is 13/11 for 6 w then 12/12 for 2 and a lesser amount on the last week, somewhere around 8-10. Just a matter of seeing how low you need to go to get them to ripen in that last week. In Kabul the days only get down to 9.9 hours so 10/14 would probably suffice.Good thread here people! Just switching to photoperiods myself as I'm using too much electric on 24-0, so very interesting stuff indeed!
For me having listened to all you guys/girls I'd like to try 24-0 for veg, 12/12 for 6 weeks, then 10-14 until they are done. Would 8on/16off not increase the chances of the plant growing seeds? Maybe the plant would think winter is really here way too early? Maybe not?
Still, very good thread with great info.
Thanks
Not really but I see no less from what I can see. Just growing for myself and a friend I really don't weigh anymore. I just know I get 8 half gal jars of bud give or take each cycle from 4 or 5 plants in 15 sq ft. Some bud is airy like Tangerine peel. Some like zeta sage is solid. But I like the quicker turn around.Have you witnessed noticeably decreased yields as compared to a 12/12 bloom cycle?
Definitely check out RM3. Grandpa's got mad game.There are many light schedules. Some use more than one on/off cycle in a 24 hour period. I may be trying this in the future once I rebuild my flowering room. Check out RM3.
WE
So this pretty much solidifies what I was saying earlier.Here's a quote from the article on Biloxi soybeans I mentioned earlier. Whether or not it applies to Cannabis is unknown.
"Seven consecutive cycles with variable high intensity photoperiods between 2 and 14 hours were inductive. Flowering increased with increasing photoperiods from 2 to 5 hours; it was maximum with photoperiods from 5 to 10 hours while it decreased with photoperiods from 10 to 14 hours. No flowering occurred with photoperiods of more than 14 hours."
Yes, but does "increased flowering" equal increased weight yield? They say in the article that there were more flowering nodes but they didn't give plant weights. So it's not entirely clear yet what the outcome would be. They only ran the experiment with the beans for 7 days too. It's suggestive that 5-10 hours may be better than 12/12 but we can't be sure yet. Maybe it's only needed for the first few weeks and maybe again for the last week, with longer days in the middle.So this pretty much solidifies what I was saying earlier.
Keep experimenting, we'll be watching for sure. This is what I love so much about this plant, so much uncharted findings, and everyone seems to find their own way so a lot becomes subjective.Yes, but does "increased flowering" equal increased weight yield? They say in the article that there were more flowering nodes but they didn't give plant weights. So it's not entirely clear yet what the outcome would be. They only ran the experiment with the beans for 7 days too. It's suggestive that 5-10 hours may be better than 12/12 but we can't be sure yet. Maybe it's only needed for the first few weeks and maybe again for the last week, with longer days in the middle.