Clown Show

Drowning-Man

Well-Known Member
People were required by law to return runaway slaves too. People are required to fund murder and police who shoot babies too.

If a person is required to serve another person, isn't that a form of involuntary servitude ?
There also thehypocratic oath to do no harm not helping a dying person would be doing harm in my beliefe just saying.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
There also thehypocratic oath to do no harm not helping a dying person would be doing harm in my beliefe just saying.

People should try to hold to any agreements they make which weren't made while under duress.

Doing harm usually requires action though. Doing nothing could mean holding a neutral position, which we can disparage, but it doesn't create the harm.

For instance if @londonfog were in the act of forcing himself upon a person who politely refused to interact with him, he would be responsible for the harm created, not you if you didn't intervene and stop the rape or assault.

Although, I would not hold it against you if in that hypothetical scenario you stopped him from using offensive force.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
People should try to hold to any agreements they make which weren't made while under duress.

Doing harm usually requires action though. Doing nothing could mean holding a neutral position, which we can disparage, but it doesn't create the harm.

For instance if @londonfog were in the act of forcing himself upon a person who politely refused to interact with him, he would be responsible for the harm created, not you if you didn't intervene and stop the rape or assault.

Although, I would not hold it against you if in that hypothetical scenario you stopped him from using offensive force.
Whats up with this rape theme today. Is one of the nurses turning you on again ? Don't do anything that's going to get you locked in your room, resulting in loss of day room privileges.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy law no more oath.
Head cracked open to the white meat and need stitches...sorry doctor don't serve men. Rob Roy law

So your car breaks down and you can't afford to fix it...ask a neighbor to borrow his and if he says no, steal the neighbors car and if he tries to stop you, punch him out ?
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
I figured since you couldn't mount a salient argument to refute mine, it wouldn't take long for you to
make shit up.

Donald Trump is a bozo. Hillary is a thug. You are a prohibitionist and lie like a rug. (I got rhymes)
If refusing to allow bigotry to seep into the public domain is prohibition, then I guess I'm a selective prohibitionist.

I don't care what you think of people of different colors, sexualities, etc when you're at home but if you want to interact with the public you better treat people equally.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Whats up with this rape theme today. Is one of the nurses turning you on again ? Don't do anything that's going to get you locked in your room, resulting in loss of day room privileges.
You seem to think using offensive force is justifiable, and haven't explained why it is.

I am eager to hear where you get the right to use a rapist tactic and force another person to interact with you ? I don't think that right exists, but clearly you do.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
You seem to think using offensive force is justifiable, and haven't explained why it is.

I am eager to hear where you get the right to use a rapist tactic and force another person to interact with you ? I don't think that right exists, but clearly you do.
The same reason why I believe force is necessary to make people drive on the right side of the street or not drive drunk. Now stop acting stupid
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
How is it different ? In each case you would be taking something which isn't yours or forcing an unwanted interaction on someone wouldn't you ?
so expecting service at a public hospital is the same as stealing my neighbors car when mine breaks down..GTFO with the stupidz
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
If refusing to allow bigotry to seep into the public domain is prohibition, then I guess I'm a selective prohibitionist.

I don't care what you think of people of different colors, sexualities, etc when you're at home but if you want to interact with the public you better treat people equally.

I do treat people equally. I believe everyone has the right to voluntarily interact with people who agree to it and nobody has the right to force an interaction on somebody who doesn't and is willing to leave others alone.

You don't believe that. You believe some people have superior rights to others and can initiate offensive force against other people and make them serve another person.

It is self evident based in your statements.
 
Top