Clown Show
- Thread starter Corso312
- Start date
Big_Lou
Well-Known Member
Big_Lou
Well-Known Member
Don't forget his 'real/important interview' with Hannity, LOL. It was r--e--a--l.
He's ghost, and there are TWO more of these sideshows!
(pops corn)
Corso312
Well-Known Member
I'm still voting for Stein but this numb nuts just handed the election to this bitch..this is extremely lopsided.
racerboy71
bud bootlegger
racerboy71
bud bootlegger
i forgot..
ra ra retard
ra ra retard
Big_Lou
Well-Known Member
racerboy71
bud bootlegger
ack ack
racerboy71
bud bootlegger
is that you, derick from texas?
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Well before you have a 12 gauge breakfast, make sure to admit your error. Oh, I forgot - you TRUMP!ees don't admit errors, you just lie harder.
Hey, tell me about the time you joined a white supremacy group.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
When attempting a character assassination it's better if your allusions have a grain of truthiness.
I'm not a Trump supporter. I'm not a white supremacy group person.
I try hard to be honest, which makes me unusual.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Then why havent you admitted that you posted a lie? I mean the Hillary quote, not the white power group.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
most people are inherently honest.
the fact that you think the trait is unique to you reflects on how you view others in such an ugly fashion.
no wonder you think racial segregation is polite and reasonable.
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
You just:
•Think stores should be able to refuse service to black/gay people (no doubt black gay people too).
•Think children can consent to sex with adults
•Think taxing people to pay for essential services is rape
My conclusion?
You don't actually think very much at all.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
I should offer a clarification, just for you, Poopy Pants.
Many people honestly believe something which is false, is true. That was my intended meaning, not an attempt to build a monument to my honesty. It has more to do with instilled obedience, rather than critical thinking. You are a good example of that mindset.
An argument which rests on the idea that a consensus of fools all agreeing on a thing which is false can make the false thing true, is a weak and fallacious argument.
I think it is false for a thing to be two opposing things at once. It's also self evident.
For example, you believe that a government can use offensive force to control people and then you also maintain the claim it exists to make sure nobody uses force against others. That is an obvious contradiction and relies on nonsense, yet you swallow it whole. Good slave.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
Oh lord...let me guess, they didn't give you your boiled egg this morning
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Let's examine your asinine assertion....
Stores are inanimate.
I think all people should not be forced to interact with others and that human interactions are best had when all the involved parties are doing so free of duress.
You contradict yourself. You correctly imply a child who is incapable of providing consent should not be forced or coerced into a human relationship. Of course no adult should be forced into a sexual relationship either or have others make their choices for them under threat of offensive force.
Then out of the other side of your mouth, you think a person who does have the ability to give or withhold consent, the owner of a property, should be forced into using their body and their property to service another person they prefer not to interact with.
There is an obvious contradiction. You attempt to hold two opposing ideas at once, on one hand you disavow the use of force to create a human interaction, then on the other you embrace it, which makes you the person who isn't thinking.