Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.

jimihendrix1

Well-Known Member
Also the Demo Platform calles for

Reschedule Marijuana to at least SCHII, and Prison Reform.

Clinton says she will Reschedule Herself if Elected, and go around the DEA, which will come with great opposition from the Right.

President has the ability to reschedule, and many speculate Obama may also reschedule before he leaves office. I doubt it, but he may.

CLINTON WILL, and has already she wants to be held responsible for promises she makes.

What does Trump want to do ??

Also if someone WANTS to do something, but is Unable, I still hold them responsible, if its Negative, and I will also give someone Credit, that Wants to do something, but is unable for whatever reason.

Big thing is they try to do something.

IMHO Rump would love to have Christy as his Attorney General. But probably couldn't get confirmed, but is in rumps heart to have him in that position.

If Christy has his way, he has already Stated....

When I get in, I will shut ALL Marijuana Operation Country Wide as MARIJUANA is STILL FEDERALLY ILLEGAL.

So make no mistake that a vote for rump is a setback for marijuana, and prison reform, especially for he Marijuana Movement.

Im also not saying Clinton is an angel either. NONE of them are.

But I just don't see how anyone can support someone that is so divisive, and is PROVEN TO LIE ABOUT EVERY 3+ MINUTES.

Also this isn't OPINION, and if its denied by the rumpers, it just proves my point over, and over, that regarless of the Facts... Clinton is Right about a certain segment being Bigoted, and would love to take us back to the 50s, and before.

But I feel her 50% Figure, is a Bit Low. As do many polls.

Rumps whole campaign is based around the Birther Issue.

Divide and Conquer. Hes Not Like Us, is what his whole deal is based upon.

As I also said.

Anyone who votes for him......

OWNS EVERYTHING ABOUT HIM.

Also I find it TELLING, that

Clinton Is OK with Fact Checking, and Trump isn't.

That means also to also Fact Check Her.

Shes Ok with being Fact Checked On the Spot. So why all the Whining about INSTANT FACT CHECKING?



I think they should hold both of their respective feet to the fire, and I also think the debates should last for at least 3 hours.
They should keep them there, and Fact Check Them, On Camera, until every last fact can be verified, that is controversial.

Then make them respond with No Ifs, Ands or Butts.

Give them only 1 chance to properly respond, and if they don't, Label that Answer as a LIE.

No Hedging. No Run Around. Yes, or No. Period. No Long Explanations, and run around.


I think that's pretty Transparent, and Upfront vs Letting Crap Slide.

Only a COWARD IS AFRAID OF BEING FACT CHECKED.
 
Last edited:

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Also the Demo Platform calles for

Reschedule Marijuana to at least SCHII, and Prison Reform.

Clinton says she will Reschedule Herself if Elected, and go around the DEA, which will come with great opposition from the Right.

President has the ability to reschedule, and many speculate Obama may also reschedule before he leaves office. I doubt it, but he may.

CLINTON WILL, and has already she wants to be held responsible for promises she makes.

What does Trump want to do ??

Also if someone WANTS to do something, but is Unable, I still hold them responsible, if its Negative, and I will also give someone Credit, that Wants to do something, but is unable for whatever reason.

Big thing is they try to do something.

IMHO Rump would love to have Christy as his Attorney General. But probably couldn't get confirmed, but is in rumps heart to have him in that position.

If Christy has his way, he has already Stated....

When I get in, I will shut ALL Marijuana Operation Country Wide as MARIJUANA is STILL FEDERALLY ILLEGAL.

So make no mistake that a vote for rump is a setback for marijuana, and prison reform, especially for he Marijuana Movement.

Im also not saying Clinton is an angel either. NONE of them are.

But I just don't see how anyone can support someone that is so divisive, and is PROVEN TO LIE ABOUT EVERY 3+ MINUTES.

Also this isn't OPINION, and if its denied by the rumpers, it just proves my point over, and over, that regarless of the Facts... Clinton is Right about a certain segment being Bigoted, and would love to take us back to the 50s, and before.

But I feel her 50% Figure, is a Bit Low. As do many polls.

Rumps whole campaign is based around the Birther Issue.

Divide and Conquer. Hes Not Like Us, is what his whole deal is based upon.

As I also said.

Anyone who votes for him......

OWNS EVERYTHING ABOUT HIM.

Also I find it TELLING, that

Clinton Is OK with Fact Checking, and Trump isn't.

That means also to also Fact Check Her.

Shes Ok with being Fact Checked On the Spot. So why all the Whining about INSTANT FACT CHECKING?



I think they should hold both of their respective feet to the fire, and I also think the debates should last for at least 3 hours.
They should keep them there, and Fact Check Them, On Camera, until every last fact can be verified, that is controversial.

Then make them respond with No Ifs, Ands or Butts.

Give them only 1 chance to properly respond, and if they don't, Label that Answer as a LIE.

No Hedging. No Run Around. Yes, or No. Period. No Long Explanations, and run around.


I think that's pretty Transparent, and Upfront vs Letting Crap Slide.

Only a COWARD IS AFRAID OF BEING FACT CHECKED.
What a complete wall of garbage, no offense. Calling ANYONE a liar in comparison to the Hildabeast is laughable, at best.

You guys are scared shitless and it shows. While I'm no fan of Trump, I can smell the liberal desperation hanging in the air like a fog. Not that your fear is unwarranted, Nate Silver now has him with a 54.9% chance of winning.
 

cheeseofchud

Well-Known Member
if trump wins,i will never looks at americans the same again....you want this man to have nuclear codes?
im purely shocked that this douchebag is actually in the running.if you think he will do anything for lower,lower/middle class citizens you need to get your head examined!SERIOUSLY!

the fucked up thing is lower class votes will be a majority for trump because they are mostly ignorant,unintelligent people!
 
Last edited:

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
if trump wins,i will never looks at americans the same again....you want this man to have nuclear codes?
im purely shocked that this douchebag is actually in the running.if you think he will do anything for lower,lower/middle class citizens you need to get your head examined!SERIOUSLY!

the fucked up thing is lower class votes will be a majority for trump because they are mostly ignorant,unintelligent people!
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Oh shit. Today is the election?

You must be a scientist.
Lolz, so we should say the same thing to all the libs that have been running their pieholes about Clinton's past (and long gone) leads in various polls and with prediction gurus? Hypocrite much?

Silver is the Gold Standard according to many libs on RIU, now he doesn't know shit?

I couldn't really care less who wins, I'm just here for the entertainment. Although, it would be awesome to watch all the "journalists" in the MSM lose their shit on live TV, if he beat her. You workaday suckers are screwed no matter who wins.
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Lolz, so we should say the same thing to all the libs that have been running their pieholes about Clinton's past (and long gone) leads in various polls and with prediction gurus? Hypocrite much?

Silver is the Gold Standard according to many libs on RIU, now he doesn't know shit?
He knows that the election is not today.
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
So does every lib touting previous poll leads for Clinton, didn't stop them, did it? It's a cute strawman you've constructed since nobody said the election is today.

Gosh, I love exposing hypocritical nitwits.
Then why aren't you quoting Nate Silver's numbers for the actual election?

Oh wait, i get it. You don't understand the math. Uh, ok. Sorry. Very sorry. Did you skip school a lot? What was the highest level of education you failed at?
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
All right, I'll do the math. Go back 32 years. In 6% of all terrorist attacks during that interval were by Islamic extremists -- foreigners or US Citizens. 2/3 of those Islamist terrorist attacks were by US Citizens or 4% -- that means 2% were by foreign born Islamist terrorists. Of ALL terrorist attacks, 98% would still have happened regardless if Trump's policy to exclude all Muslim immigrants had been in place.

Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Soil by Group, From 1980 to 2005, According to FBI Database​

http://www.globalresearch.ca/non-muslims-carried-out-more-than-90-of-all-terrorist-attacks-in-america/5333619

Here is a summary of all terrorist attacks during Bush and Obama administrations current through July, 2016

http://ijr.com/2016/07/650786-terror-attacks-bush-vs-obama-administration-so-far-presidency-list/

If you scan through it, you'll see that most were by Christians or -- too funny this -- Rob Roy's Anarcho-Capitalist/Libertarian type extremists. A handful, maybe 8 of the attacks since 9/11 were by Muslims and most of them were US born.

Trump's plan to ban Muslim immigration won't affect the real cause of terrorist attacks in this country. Most are just US born nutjobs like @Rob Roy or @Illinois Enema Bandit or @Flaming Pie.

In the past decade (2006-2016), reactionary Right Wing extremists are to blame for the recent spike in fatal terrorist shootings. Earlier, there were Left Wing (Eco), Puerto Rican separatists, and Communist extremists that were to blame but that is old history and there hasn't been a fatality related to the latter three groups in twenty years.
1980 to 2005, Well done.

The thing about being good at what you do is to not let others know it`s you. Then you are not considered and left out.

When you evac an entire Country, and leave behind the bad guys,...What have you really done ?

When you leave the good guys in their Country and take out the bad guys, ..What have you really done ?

I don`t support evacuating an entire country and leaving the bad guys to rule.

I do support leaving the good guys at home and taking out the bad guys. Why displace them from their culture only to leave the extremists in control ?

I wouldn`t want to be forced to leave Boston so bad guys can have it.
 
Last edited:

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
When you evac an entire Country, and leave behind the bad guys,...What have you really done ?
Saved the lives of tens of thousands of innocent people and given them a chance to grow up and lead normal lives. This will cut down on radicalization in the long run even if it does allow a terrorist or two. They can come over on a visa anyway - it is much easier.

Also you create a target rich environment in the country that you have evacuated. Which allows you to strike targets that are not protected by a "wall of refugees".
When you leave the good guys in their Country and take out the bad guys, ..What have you really done ?
I don't think anybody knows how to take out the bad guys alone. It is a quaint idea but show your total ignorance of the situation. How many innocents would you have to kill to get the bad guys? Would that action have a reaction? Like radicalizing more of them and even a good number of Americans opposed to murdering children?

You are not very good at thinking. Sorry not to gloss over it like your teachers always did.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
Saved the lives of tens of thousands of innocent people and given them a chance to grow up and lead normal lives. This will cut down on radicalization in the long run even if it does allow a terrorist or two. They can come over on a visa anyway - it is much easier.

Also you create a target rich environment in the country that you have evacuated. Which allows you to strike targets that are not protected by a "wall of refugees".


I don't think anybody knows how to take out the bad guys alone. It is a quaint idea but show your total ignorance of the situation. How many innocents would you have to kill to get the bad guys? Would that action have a reaction? Like radicalizing more of them and even a good number of Americans opposed to murdering children?

You are not very good at thinking. Sorry not to gloss over it like your teachers always did.

I like your effort, but you answered wrong. Please feel free to try again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top