true, but doesn't Hillary have the same risk factor?except that he basically has heart disease, high cholesterol, a horrible diet of fast food, and no exercise.
heart attack imminent.
true, but doesn't Hillary have the same risk factor?
Hillary has been living on promises of being the president going on 15 years now. If she doesnt win this race she is dead anyway..
The Clintons will have no power and/or leverage at that point and their charity will be worthless.
true, but doesn't Hillary have the same risk factor?
hillary has a CAC score of 0. so no.
and trump lied about his height so that he would be marked as "overweight" instead of the proper label of "obese".
Change his shitty slogan to 'Make America eat cake again'?
At least guaranteed cake would mean there isn't a single child starving in the most advanced economy on the planet.Change his shitty slogan to 'Make America eat cake again'?
filthy penis
At least guaranteed cake would mean there isn't a single child starving in the most advanced economy on the planet.
As an aside to all the election shit, how can a single child be let go to bed hungry? The stats are depressing and neither Democrat nor Republican want to address it.
that guy needs to change his personal slogan to something about not eating fast food every day. that shit is gonna kill him.
not that i mind.
Just give them more Food Stamps but restrict them to nutritionally beneficial products.What would you like the government to do? Sterilize the parents that are irresponsibly popping out kids they cant even feed? I know, lets give them more benefits so they can pop out more kids the government can feed....
Maybe government isnt the answer in every situation.
BJust give them more Food Stamps but restrict them to nutritionally beneficial products.
Ain't no reason why someone should be buying 5 gal of soda and 16 cans of Red Bull on food stamps.
With that said, if I'd to choose between;
A: Preventing people buying luxuries on food stamps
&
B: Making sure kids don't go to bed hungry
I know what I'd choose.
Just give them more Food Stamps but restrict them to nutritionally beneficial products.
Ain't no reason why someone should be buying 5 gal of soda and 16 cans of Red Bull on food stamps.
With that said, if I'd to choose between;
A: Preventing people buying luxuries on food stamps
&
B: Making sure kids don't go to bed hungry
I know what I'd choose.
Just give them more Food Stamps but restrict them to nutritionally beneficial products.
Ain't no reason why someone should be buying 5 gal of soda and 16 cans of Red Bull on food stamps.
With that said, if I'd to choose between;
A: Preventing people buying luxuries on food stamps
&
B: Making sure kids don't go to bed hungry
I know what I'd choose.
Wow, you came back shit-stupid. Starving kids aren't an answer. Kids getting enough to eat is the foundation to raising them to be productive adults. Also raising healthy children that are well prepared to take on an adult world is necessary for a stable society. Food assistance is a good investment. Especially when the economy is managed so that 5% are unemployed and minimum wages are kept well below is below the poverty line for a family with children.What would you like the government to do? Sterilize the parents that are irresponsibly popping out kids they cant even feed? I know, lets give them more benefits so they can pop out more kids the government can feed....
Maybe government isnt the answer in every situation.