Hybridway
Well-Known Member
You have 2 BML Spyders? Thought you only had 1 that you customized.I'm in line for one, too. Be interesting to see how it compares to my 2+ yo BML SPYDR 600 (~ 350w)
I bet those BML's will flower well if you push the bars together close.
I'm mad at BML. They were the first light I ever wanted once getting interested in LEDs. Saw that comparison grow w/ that N.Cal grower against the Gavitas.
The results showed the BML Spyder 1200's (660w) beat out the Gavitas & produce higher THC & Terp levels. I wanted & did believe it for so long.
Then I noticed NO documented grows anywhere for the longest time using BML's. Found one in You-Tube where the guy had like 6-9 going. The plants budded nice but got bleached tips. He never finished the documentation of the grow.
Since, I have seen a few plants that were supposedly flowered under the Spyder1200 that looked beaf. But IDK.
That Grow-Max spectrum is as Burple as it gets. Can it / Does it actually produce big?
Since then, Fluence Bio came out, improving the spectrum as an enhanced white. Looks like a killer spectrum & the price went down on the units.
When I spoke w/ BML, they admitted the Grow-Max spectrum wasn't right & that's why they produced bleached tips.
But how can the Grow-Max spectrum be soooo similiar to all these other burples & do well while the others do terrible? Maybe because BML used quality LEDs that were far more efficient?!? Dunno!
But Fluence seams to be the best Low-LED (my made up term) out.
Has anyone seen any grows using them?
I think the Gavitas comparison grow w/ the N.Cal grower is BS now. Unless highly efficient Burple was the key difference to their success using the Grow-Max spectrum. Quite possible as most of these other Burples are said to be 20-30% efficient. Which was counter theoried by the spectrum R+B theory of only giving the plants the colors they needed. Hence making electrical efficiency less important & ultimetly splitting the difference.
But, now I think white & enhanced white is the only way to go.
Still up for a go at Burple aside from my HH. Which I almost feel like the spectral graph they posted on their site is a lie & it's actually differant.
EcoSunLite has contacted me through this forum to do the side by side w/ Amare since they claim to be so similar. I highly doubt they will follow through. But if they do, I will provide a very fair & unbiased grow, side by side, review.
It would be called Enhanced Burple vs. Enhanced White. Amare + Eco comparison.
I truly do believe the enhanced Burple can do well. But still have yet to see Burple do anything in my hands.
The HH is enhanced Burple @ the moment & seems to be doing quite well. Mind you, it was never a true Burple to begin w/. It has about 9% green in its all in one spectrum according to the graph they provide & appears almost white in a pinkish blue Kind've way.
Pet, you could push the bars close one the Spyder600 & it would be the same dimensions as a Pro-3 or 4 almost.
I think that would be a great side by side but you'll have to step up your grow game to be conclusive. No offense bro. Really!
Ok, rant over. I hope Eco does send me the light for the comparison. Like I've said 100x, I feel I was beat on my Burple experience.