Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Brilliant argument poopy pants.
DEA:Cannabis to remain classified
- Thread starter Singlemalt
- Start date
Brilliant argument poopy pants.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you can't refute it.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
By asking the question "Can a person delegate a right they do not posses?" you're presuming the act of creating the law is a "right". It is not. Like I just said, it's a responsibility entrusted to people publicly elected to office
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
So, if a statutory law violates a persons right, should the person who has the erm "entrusted responsibility" enforce that law anyway and be magically exempt from any repercussions which would fall on you or I if we acted in a similar manner?
It sounds like you are saying, whether a thing is right or not, it's okay for the enforcer to enforce ALL laws, simply because the idiots who made the shitty laws handed him a gun and a weekly paycheck. How is that not a form of organized crime?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
this will end up with you calling civil rights and integration "rape and slavery" before you refuse to state that it should be illegal for adults to have sex with 8 year old children.
steviebevie will come along to put a like on those pedo posts though.
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
Do I even want to ask?
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
"If a law violates a person's right, should the police enforce it?"
No, I don't think they should, but what I think is irrelevant to what is
It sounds like you are trying to equivocate creating the law with enforcing the law, which has nothing to do with your original question "Can a person delegate a right they do not posses?"
Politicians are publicly elected by representatives, this gives them the ability to write the laws
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
You forgot the part about the Wendy's bathroom shit incident, Poopy Pants....You sort of prematurely evacuated in your debate analysis summary.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
"If a law violates a person's right, should the police enforce it?"
No, I don't think they should, but what I think is irrelevant to what is
Many insidious things occur on a regular and frequent basis, these things then become "normal" to people. Upon scratching just a bit below the surface, many things which are "normal" arise from things which we (most people) say we are against. So, only when enough individuals change the way they think, will normal things shift away from being insidious to being based in something logical and consistent . To think one thing, but to do another thing because the other thing is "normal" can sometimes keep advancement stuck in neutral.
So, yes, it matters what each of thinks, since "normal" is comprised of the aggregate of our thoughts (or lack thereof) which are then carried out thru our actions, or our inactions.
My original question, "Can a person delegate a right they do not possess" has a self evident answer. The answer is no.
It also means that what is "normal", an involuntarily based government, is illegitimate and relies upon an inconsistency and fraud.
Politicians are people who have no more right to deprive a person of a right than you or I do. Their "authority" comes from an inconsistent application of logic and the irrational beliefs of the public is all that keeps the illusion alive. Cognitive dissonance on steroids = Most people today.
Somewhere there are some decent videos that illustrate my last point, maybe I'll dig around and see if I can find them.
Last edited: