skunkwreck
Well-Known Member
I'll get you the link from Chemdog and JJ Edwards about the Chem 4
Purest chem in seed form?
- Thread starter Steelsurgeon
- Start date
OLD MOTHER SATIVA
Well-Known Member
it is ..good eye seeing as that was what i said....its been chemd for the last few years as far as i can see..chemd rules
91 is skinny powerful too and can hermi..chem4 is bulkier potent and nice ..
but chemd is dense potent perfect indica look
and shines with its own light
91 is skinny powerful too and can hermi..chem4 is bulkier potent and nice ..
but chemd is dense potent perfect indica look
and shines with its own light
2easy
Well-Known Member
just go to Gu i bet you find his customer service better
OneStonedPony
Well-Known Member
Here is Good Ole Dog's (aka SkunkVA) pic of Chem 91. Recognized as the Chemdog that started it all. The one Chemdog gave to SkunkVA, and later got back from him.
*
^^^ page 11 of the 91'chemdog thread on Ic mag
^^^ page 125 of that same thread. ISP's Chem 91 grown by Hammerhead, 40 days into flowering.
IMHO Chem 91 is more potent than Chem D. ISP's version, because it has preinvasion afghan in it, has a better flavor and slightly heavier trich coverage than the SkunkVA cut. The consensus on Ic mag of the majority of older growers is ISP's version is closer to the real Chem 91 (SkunkVA) than the JB's cut that often gets passed around as Chem 91. I say until you grow it and try it for yourself, you're missing out. I've grown all of ISP's Chems now, and none have disappointed. In fact, their IC91(Insane Chem 91) is too potent for me, it totally wrecks my day, so I don't hit it often or mix it with lesser strains when I do.
*
^^^ page 11 of the 91'chemdog thread on Ic mag
^^^ page 125 of that same thread. ISP's Chem 91 grown by Hammerhead, 40 days into flowering.
IMHO Chem 91 is more potent than Chem D. ISP's version, because it has preinvasion afghan in it, has a better flavor and slightly heavier trich coverage than the SkunkVA cut. The consensus on Ic mag of the majority of older growers is ISP's version is closer to the real Chem 91 (SkunkVA) than the JB's cut that often gets passed around as Chem 91. I say until you grow it and try it for yourself, you're missing out. I've grown all of ISP's Chems now, and none have disappointed. In fact, their IC91(Insane Chem 91) is too potent for me, it totally wrecks my day, so I don't hit it often or mix it with lesser strains when I do.
Last edited:
CannaBruh
Well-Known Member
So that's an out-cross and a bx of some type? I'll say that of the out-crosses of any of the chem/sour lines, most all of the progeny are winners. That ISP has that dense flower look of the chem for sure.
The D is my favorite. The D and the giesel are my favorite to out-cross. ECSD can make some nice progeny, but that thing is finicky at times.
The D is my favorite. The D and the giesel are my favorite to out-cross. ECSD can make some nice progeny, but that thing is finicky at times.
Last edited:
OneStonedPony
Well-Known Member
@CannaBruh Yes the one labeled ISP's is a Chem 91 bx3, mix of Chem 91 cut (Chemdog>AJ>Ohso) and preinvasion afghan, backcrossed a few times. It's very potent. The IC91 (Insane Chem 91) is Chem 91 bx2 (f) x Chem 91 bx3 (m), some phenos of it, yield even better than the Chem 91 bx. I can smoke the ISP Chem 91 bx or Chem D bx3 during the day, but not their IC91. A few tokes of it and I'm wiped out.
Bubba's girl
Well-Known Member
It's currently Chem4 on Dr G's website. It was Chem4 about a year and half ago when I bought a pack. I've been stalking his offerings the last few years and it's always been Chem4 in that time. If you look back at Dr Gruber's grow reports it was the Chem4 by Dr Greenthumb he grew out a few years back. And that pic the colas look nice and fat, the D has denser colas not quite that fat as the 4.
skunkwreck
Well-Known Member
Lol ok I misunderstood... I thought you were saying it was supposed to be Chem 91 and you were thinking it looked like Chem d... I was agreeing with you saying it looked like Chem d to me too .
OLD MOTHER SATIVA
Well-Known Member
yeh not close to the 91.. good call
i grew that d really well in the photo ..they got more dense in the next few weeks
..had his #4 when it came out..it was more conical
good description ..bubbas girl
i'll stop now ..all the best
i grew that d really well in the photo ..they got more dense in the next few weeks
..had his #4 when it came out..it was more conical
good description ..bubbas girl
i'll stop now ..all the best
HeirLoom GarGz
Well-Known Member
No the D 91 Both sour but D reeks like rotten meat funk chem 4 might not be original bagseed but D 91 sister are for fact.
skunkwreck
Well-Known Member
None of my chems have been sour or. atleast not what I'd call sour anyway...mine are funky smelling like stump water , dirty socks and putrid meat at times
skunkwreck
Well-Known Member
Beautiful flowers.
skunkwreck
Well-Known Member
I got some ISP's Chem D bx3 I need to work through .
skunkwreck
Well-Known Member
That'll be nice .
BigLittlejohn
Well-Known Member
His slush puppy strain should be fire. He hit a chem d cut called the snow dog cut that came from chem himself with that 3 chems male. I am so stoked to have that in my garden right now.
CannaBruh
Well-Known Member
Man, I'd be lying if I said no part of me was hoping for some slush puppy freebies
he hooked it up heavy on the packs though and with the genes he's working it's just gonna be stupid fire I think there's no doubting that. You can basically punt anything at the Chem D and it spits flaming beans.
3chems though, a blend of what could arguably be said to be the "favorites" the 4, the D, the '91. We shall see
