FBI NOT GOING TO RECOMMEND INDICTMENT!!

bearkat42

Well-Known Member
I don't believe they were lied to for a minute. I hate bush. He should be in prison. So should Clinton. How you can defend her while attacking bush boggles my mind. It's like saying you love milli but vanilli was a hack. On foreign policy they are the same. Both are CIA puppets ran by banks.

But she's a grandma you have to!
Again, I'm not defending her. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy.
 

8thGenFarmer

Well-Known Member
Again, I'm not defending her. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy.
Well yeah republicans are a bunch of hypocrites lol. Bush is a lying criminal and they didn't care. They helped create the mess of unaccountable presidents.

I've been a single issue voter since 2003, give me a peace candidate and I don't care if they drown kittens for a hobby. We need peace.
 

bearkat42

Well-Known Member
Well yeah republicans are a bunch of hypocrites lol. Bush is a lying criminal and they didn't care. They helped create the mess of unaccountable presidents.

I've been a single issue voter since 2003, give me a peace candidate and I don't care if they drown kittens for a hobby. We need peace.
You see, we actually agree. Lol
 

bearkat42

Well-Known Member
We do have a pot entrepreneurs running...any way you'd consider him?
Honestly, Hillary is going to carry my state (Maryland) anyway. For this reason, I will readily admit that I haven't really researched any of the 3rd party candidates, but I'm always open.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member

Nothing says "World Leader" in the land of the "rule of law" like being caught lying and no prosecution while winging all over the US on Air Force One w/ Barry for campaign appearances.

Maybe this is the reason that the UN official who was going to testify against Hitlery committed "suicide by barbell" just days before testifying as it would be a better object lesson for Mr. Comey.

I thought the tendency for lying was an intrinsic value evinced by low to non-existent IQ, grossly inflated self esteem, and penis envy as proven by Bucky 94,000+ times, but it definitely seems to be reinforced by example for (D)evotees, as the above proves.

The AG recusing herself after the "golf and grandchildren" chat was the cherry waiting for today's excrement sundae.
Precisely. Remember this moment of outrage in November.

Bernie2016!
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Here's an article that maybe better articulated the danger of clintons foreign policy.

http://www.salon.com/2016/03/13/as_reckless_as_george_w_bush_hillary_clinton_helped_create_disorder_in_iraq_libya_syria_and_scarier_doesnt_seem_to_understand_how/

Until we are given a real choice for a pro peace candidate I can't vote democrat for her. I'm with Garry Johnson this time. Bernie could have won Hillary will have trouble.
When was the last time Johnson received 13M votes?
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
So if there is no intent found but evidence of a crime is found in her home and on her server. Literally the smoking gun of the crime found but no evidence of "intent".

What a load of horseshit.
If there wasn't intent, then she was bumbling..which would you prefer in a president?
 

8thGenFarmer

Well-Known Member
When was the last time Johnson received 13M votes?
Well he ran as a libertarian, they don't have a primary lol. They choose their candidate at a national convention because they don't have money of the main two parties.

I do like the idea of writing in Bernie though. Would send a message that the party needs to nominate someone with our values to get our votes. I don't like being taken for granted.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Well he ran as a libertarian, they don't have a primary lol. They choose their candidate at a national convention because they don't have money of the main two parties.

I do like the idea of writing in Bernie though. Would send a message that the party needs to nominate someone with our values to get our votes. I don't like being taken for granted.
Bernie proved you don't need money and can still do just fine..
 

bearkat42

Well-Known Member
Couldn't they at least given her a parking ticket?..something?

If this were you or me or Patraeus..?
If she weren't running, they probably would have. At least a symbolic "slap on the wrist". But she is running, where a symbolic slap on the wrist could prove devastating, so... nothing.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
No, of course we shouldn't make the keep making the same mistakes over and over. My comment was simply to highlight the fact that many folks in here are displaying a bit of selective outrage. This current email scandal, while bad, does not rise to anywhere the level of purposely lying a country into a war that is literally costing trillions (with a T) of dollars and thousands of American (mostly poor kids) lives. Not to mention the countless Iraqi civilian lives, and the complete destabilization of the entire region. But let's hang hillary for some fucking emails. And this is from someone who can't stand her and will not be voting for her.

P.S. Almost forgot to mention the 5 million emails that bush and cheney deleted.
I wonder if Hillarys fight for universal children's health included the superpredator version?
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
If she weren't running, they probably would have. At least a symbolic "slap on the wrist". But she is running, where a symbolic slap on the wrist could prove devastating, so... nothing.
Honestly, this is way worse for many reasons..

I'm with Trump on this..it's a disgrace.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
FBI said no intent and not criminal. That's what they said. This is not a strawman argument. But you just confirmed you don't need a law, just your gut to tell you if people are guilty. Trump is guilty of rape because somebody said so and Hillary is guilty (of what exactly?) because somebody said so. At least you are honest. Nuts, but honest. I can respect that. Of course I disagree but that's another matter.
I know this is difficult, but when Comey says no criminal charges because of the lack of intent and the law CLEARLY states negligence, that's either a strawman or a redefining of the law by an individual who doesn't have that authority to do so. You can argue the reason for his action all day, but the law is crystal clear. I don't think anyone is surprised she slipped the noose, but the reason given, under the circumstances and clarity of the security regs, is ludicrous. I guess if you can't show she didn't break the law, change it.
 
Last edited:
Top