Minimum wage jobs will always exist, anyone that works full time should be paid a living wage regardless of the work they do
This isn't a revolutionary concept, it's common sense and it benefits the economy
Common sense?
Okay, then please answer my questions high lighted in this post.
Here's a hypothetical scenario which challenges your "revolutionary concept" of third party interventions in other peoples business as being acceptable business practice...
What if a person makes an agreement with another person to do something and their payment is based on the accomplishment of the task rather than a set time frame, but the person making the bid wasn't as competent as they thought they might be and it takes them much longer than they originally thought,
should they be able to demand more money?
Let's say
@UncleBuck agrees to sanitize all the Wendy's bathrooms in a 500 mile radius for a given amount of money, say $25,000, but the task takes him much longer and his helpers are reluctant to get out of bed and do any work, (he foolishly paid them in advance) and by the time he's gone thru $25,000 in project related expenses he's only half done with the project.
He'll then need to hire some competent workers and of course they'll need some money, and because he's such an honorable man, Uncle Buck realizes for the next several weeks he'll have to work much longer hours himself just to complete the job.
By the end of it, because of poor planning and a host of other overruns, Uncle Buck only completes 2/3rds of the job and it took him so much longer than he originally thought that his hourly rate, for the time he did show up, only came to $6.49 .
Does somebody "owe" him some MORE money so that the amount of time he did work (or claimed to) comes out to at least $15 per hour?
Bonus question
Further, there is a mysterious outbreak of cholera at the bathrooms he DID manage to get to, and signs point to vandalization by a fecal bandit as being the cause.
Who should pay to compensate the infected people?