BiGrEd1011
Well-Known Member
So you wouldnt be mad about your doctor sending your medical file over fucking yahoo mail? lol.
Indictment Countdown...
- Thread starter NLXSK1
- Start date
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
Cheesus,
No bullshit here. I am just trying to talk to you.
Nobody wins on the internet. If you back the wrong horse it doesnt make you worse or me better or anything like that. Sometimes we fight beyond what we should just due to inertia.
Padwan and others rail against money and power influencing politics. And they are right, of course money and power influences politics because politics can influence everything else.
Our officials need to be accountable to the people. We do that by having records laws that retain communications of our government officials to keep them honest. If we allow the system to support corruption then we have corrupt politicians unaccountable to the people serving the wealthy and powerful.
My position is that Hillary Clinton represents what we dont want in government. She is dishonest, she has a proven track record of misleading and outright lying. Her charitable foundation takes in hundreds of millions of dollars and spends 90% on itself and then doles out 10% for charitable giving. Her husband's speaking fees tripled when she became Secretary of State and the income to the charity from foreign donors skyrocketed. Her policies have changed based on donations into the charity by interested parties.
It is not about which team wins as much as it is about accountability and responsibility and increasing evidence shows that Hillary Clinton has not been either.
No bullshit here. I am just trying to talk to you.
Nobody wins on the internet. If you back the wrong horse it doesnt make you worse or me better or anything like that. Sometimes we fight beyond what we should just due to inertia.
Padwan and others rail against money and power influencing politics. And they are right, of course money and power influences politics because politics can influence everything else.
Our officials need to be accountable to the people. We do that by having records laws that retain communications of our government officials to keep them honest. If we allow the system to support corruption then we have corrupt politicians unaccountable to the people serving the wealthy and powerful.
My position is that Hillary Clinton represents what we dont want in government. She is dishonest, she has a proven track record of misleading and outright lying. Her charitable foundation takes in hundreds of millions of dollars and spends 90% on itself and then doles out 10% for charitable giving. Her husband's speaking fees tripled when she became Secretary of State and the income to the charity from foreign donors skyrocketed. Her policies have changed based on donations into the charity by interested parties.
It is not about which team wins as much as it is about accountability and responsibility and increasing evidence shows that Hillary Clinton has not been either.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
I know your furiously masturbating to this latest report.
But so far. No laws have been broken. And if Clinton goes down for it. So will Powell and Rice.
I'm not going to lose. I'll vote for Sanders.
But so far. No laws have been broken. And if Clinton goes down for it. So will Powell and Rice.
I'm not going to lose. I'll vote for Sanders.
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
I have been telling you that Clinton was dirty for a year now and your mantra has been show me she broke laws.
So NBC is lying about Clinton breaking laws? Did they suddenly become part of the vast right wing conspiracy?
Clinton is already claiming the IG appointed by Obama is biased against her... Typical posturing... LOL!
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
Using personal email = dirty?
Well Powell is one dirty criminal motherfucker as well then.
Rice is a dirty Bitch as well by those standards
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
No.
BiGrEd1011
Well-Known Member
News flash.....Thats also Illegal and people are getting sued and thrown in jail for it all the time.
"HIPPA"
is a patient privacy law. You cant just go sending bullshit threw personal email. Specially government information.
In the Army I had access to literally THOUSANDS of social security numbers, parent names, date of births....... Did I ever send that shit threw personal email? FUCK NO! I would encryt it and send it threw my personal military email. Anyone can get onto a personal email. Hacking into military emails.....not everyone can do that.
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
Yeah, and Bill Clinton's impeachment was about a blowjob...
I gotta make a lot of money today so I cant sit and play with you
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
The U.S. State Department inspector general's report shows Hillary Clinton's email practices reflected those of other secretaries of state and that her use of personal email was known to government officials at the time, a Clinton spokesman said on Wednesday.
"The report shows that problems with the State Department's electronic recordkeeping systems were longstanding and that there was no precedent of someone in her position having a State Department email account until after the arrival of her successor," spokesman Brian Fallon said in a statement.
He also said the report, which was distributed to lawmakers, showed no successful breach of the private server she used.
(Reporting by Luciana Lopez; Writing by Doina Chiacu; Editing by Jonathan Oatis)
"The report shows that problems with the State Department's electronic recordkeeping systems were longstanding and that there was no precedent of someone in her position having a State Department email account until after the arrival of her successor," spokesman Brian Fallon said in a statement.
He also said the report, which was distributed to lawmakers, showed no successful breach of the private server she used.
(Reporting by Luciana Lopez; Writing by Doina Chiacu; Editing by Jonathan Oatis)
AKDrifter
Well-Known Member
" a Clinton spokesman said on Wednesday." Yes he did not say she is full of shit and broke the rules, thats his job.
The rest of the news looks like this.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/26/opinions/clinton-email-server-ig-report-opinion-cox/
This is Bernie's golden opportunity.
The rest of the news looks like this.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/26/opinions/clinton-email-server-ig-report-opinion-cox/
This is Bernie's golden opportunity.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Boog Powell and Jim Rice? Damn let 'em rest they were just big guys and never used any steroids, Prohibitionist.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Obligatory comment about your "anarchy" status not being real.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
*you're
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
So, how much do you charge for making up a favorable report for your client in order to curry repeat business?Yeah, and Bill Clinton's impeachment was about a blowjob...
I gotta make a lot of money today so I cant sit and play with you
nitro harley
Well-Known Member
Chesus, Stay calm. Losing is not the end of the world. Simmer down ,everything will work out. Trump might even make it possible for you to get ahead a little bit before you get to be my age. nitro
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
There will be no indictment.
Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
She deserves prison time. Anyone else would be prosecuted for sending sensitive materials over personal email.
Have you ever worked a government job or signed a disclosure agreement?
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
I'm hoping that Hillary gets booted in favor of Bernie, but not on trumped up hyperbole. I mean, you guys aren't really saying we don't like her and we are angry that she used a private server so she should "go to jail" are you? Shouldn't there actually be an illegal act that's like a felony or something? What exactly is the charge that has been filed? I tried to find out but couldn't anything more specific than this:
http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/we-fact-checked-trumps-claim-that-virtually-every-single-legal-expert-say-clinton-committed-a-crime/
Its a real head-scratcher of an article for sure. I don't know how you can be so sure of yourself when you cry for capital punishment or whatever you think she deserves.
This is the most specific and believable statement in the article:
Former federal prosecutor Anne Tompkins (who also prosecuted David Petraeus), she wrote “The key element that distinguishes Secretary Clinton’s email retention practices from Petraeus’ sharing of classified information is that Petraeus knowingly engaged in unlawful conduct, and that was the basis of his criminal liability.”
A good interpretation of that interpretation is:
LawNewz.com founder, Dan Abrams, also believes based on what we know today, Clinton did not commit a crime. “The reality as I see it is one that won’t entirely satisfy either side — that based on what we know today, she likely did violate government procedures and rules, but not the law,” Abrams said.
You guys can bay to the moon all you like. Yes she clowned around with government files and some rules were broken. Near as I can tell, she committed nothing worse than the equivalent of jaywalking. Of course, voters can decide against her if they like, law or no. Otherwise, you are just making shit up.
http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/we-fact-checked-trumps-claim-that-virtually-every-single-legal-expert-say-clinton-committed-a-crime/
Its a real head-scratcher of an article for sure. I don't know how you can be so sure of yourself when you cry for capital punishment or whatever you think she deserves.
This is the most specific and believable statement in the article:
Former federal prosecutor Anne Tompkins (who also prosecuted David Petraeus), she wrote “The key element that distinguishes Secretary Clinton’s email retention practices from Petraeus’ sharing of classified information is that Petraeus knowingly engaged in unlawful conduct, and that was the basis of his criminal liability.”
A good interpretation of that interpretation is:
LawNewz.com founder, Dan Abrams, also believes based on what we know today, Clinton did not commit a crime. “The reality as I see it is one that won’t entirely satisfy either side — that based on what we know today, she likely did violate government procedures and rules, but not the law,” Abrams said.
You guys can bay to the moon all you like. Yes she clowned around with government files and some rules were broken. Near as I can tell, she committed nothing worse than the equivalent of jaywalking. Of course, voters can decide against her if they like, law or no. Otherwise, you are just making shit up.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
absolute zero chance for an indictment