EXCUSE ME?!..The OFFICIAL Bernie Sanders For President 2016 Thread

Most polls show Trump coming from behind and leading Hillary as the next president. She has no message, no viable concrete plans, and neither does Sanders compared to Trump.
 
It's going to be big and really awesome

Hey Chesus, After another six months it will be huge. Are you thinking about Gary Johnson? I was following him in a penny stock that claimed to be in the pot business and it ended up scamming millions of dollars out of stupid people that bought into the story line. nitro
 
Hey Chesus, After another six months it will be huge. Are you thinking about Gary Johnson? I was following him in a penny stock that claimed to be in the pot business and it ended up scamming millions of dollars out of stupid people that bought into the story line. nitro
Trump has scammed stupid people out of millions.
What a coincidence you are following them both
 
Hey Chesus, After another six months it will be huge. Are you thinking about Gary Johnson? I was following him in a penny stock that claimed to be in the pot business and it ended up scamming millions of dollars out of stupid people that bought into the story line. nitro

Cannabis biz is a racket. A former member here got into this pot stock at $1.00. It's trading at $.09. My prediction is this fraudalent pot infrastructure company will soon be de-listed. http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/advchart/frames/frames.asp?show=&insttype=Stock&symb=srna&x=43&y=11&time=7&startdate=1/4/1999&enddate=7/11/2014&freq=1&compidx=aaaaa:0&comptemptext=&comp=none&ma=1&maval=50&uf=8&lf=32&lf2=512&lf3=4&type=4&style=320&size=2&timeFrameToggle=false&compareToToggle=false&indicatorsToggle=false&chartStyleToggle=false&state=11

TA indicators were set by me.
 
Sky you cannot go by polls as if they are actual elections.
Before Sanders can have a chance to go against Trump he would have to beat Clinton. He can't.

So are you deferring to 'skewed' polls?

:lol:

Then I guess the 'I have 2M more votes than Sanders' Clinton word track..you can't go by that as if it is actual representation since everyone has not voted..now can you?

And you also must believe that Clintons margin against Trump is fallacy as well?

Why do they have polls?

Better yet, why do campaigns spend thousands to run them? Are you aware it costs a campaign $15-20k each time they run a new one?
 
So are you deferring to 'skewed' polls?

Then I guess the 'I have 2M more votes than Sanders' Clinton word track..you can't go by that as if it is actual representation since everyone has not voted..now can you?

So, you also believe that Clintons margin against Trump is fallacy as well?

Why do they have polls?

Better yet, why do campaigns spend thousands to run them? Are you aware it costs a campaign $15-20k each time they run a new one?

You knew your nefarious party had this rigged from the get-go. Get over it.

He might still have a chance although she is just a few votes from wrapping it up. Fox News 15 minutes ago stated that the Inspector General had found that Clinton had thousands of secret emails on her PRIVATE server. (As if there was any doubt.) Private, not public in case any of your spinmeister libtards leaders want to spin it as "everybody does it." They might, but NOT on a private server where no one has access.

So, I think the noose is tightening and Crazy Sanders might get the nom. :clap:
 
In a fair contest he'd mop the floor with her. This primary season has shown every citizen who cares to pay attention just how rigged our 'democracy' has become and how little the voice of We the People counts towards outcomes anymore.

THIS is the real reason Mr Sanders should stick to his guns, because his fight against the machine has shown just how corrupt it is. And, it's why he has my vote.

If the average American sees this election process and concludes there's nothing wrong with it, then they deserve the ass fucking they'll get. Over and over again until they get tired of it.

@schuylaar put it well and succinctly above; 'if not now, then when?'


Bravo, simply bra-vo:clap:

It's laziness, Tty. It takes effort to make a change.

This is why a Hillary Clinton presidency will be Barak Obama's third term.
 
Last edited:
You knew your nefarious party had this rigged from the get-go. Get over it.

He might still have a chance although she is just a few votes from wrapping it up. Fox News 15 minutes ago stated that the Inspector General had found that Clinton had thousands of secret emails on her PRIVATE server. (As if there was any doubt.) Private, not public in case any of your spinmeister libtards leaders want to spin it as "everybody does it." They might, but NOT on a private server where no one has access.

So, I think the noose is tightening and Crazy Sander might get nom. :clap:

And yet, they're trying to shove her down our throats and on the flip saying we need to unite..why? If Clinton is so wonderful and popular she doesn't need Sanders' supporters.

Ben, neither is going to have the delegates required.

Are you aware the 'pledged' super delegates were already 'pledged' prior to Sanders' announcement to run? Before ANY state contest ran- they were pledged.

He'll be close enough, with better poll numbers.

Currently, Clintons numbers are within margin of error to Trump.

Any sane person who wishes to stop Trump would choose Sanders over Clinton.

That is- if they truly wish to win; not anoint.
 
Last edited:
You knew your nefarious party had this rigged from the get-go. Get over it.

He might still have a chance although she is just a few votes from wrapping it up. Fox News 15 minutes ago stated that the Inspector General had found that Clinton had thousands of secret emails on her PRIVATE server. (As if there was any doubt.) Private, not public in case any of your spinmeister libtards leaders want to spin it as "everybody does it." They might, but NOT on a private server where no one has access.

So, I think the noose is tightening and Crazy Sanders might get the nom. :clap:
Republicans sure are desperate to see Sanders as the nominee
 
So are you deferring to 'skewed' polls?

:lol:

Then I guess the 'I have 2M more votes than Sanders' Clinton word track..you can't go by that as if it is actual representation since everyone has not voted..now can you?

And you also must believe that Clintons margin against Trump is fallacy as well?

Why do they have polls?

Better yet, why do campaigns spend thousands to run them? Are you aware it costs a campaign $15-20k each time they run a new one?
We don't go by polls results to determine the winner of an election. We go by the actual voting. Why is this so hard to you to understand. Here read this

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/primary-polls-problems_us_55cb5b80e4b0f73b20bb3f02
 
Republicans sure are desperate to see Sanders as the nominee
That's because republicans are stupid, you spend a lot of time highlighting that fact on this forum all the time

Sanders beats Trump by double digits in the general election, Clinton and Trump are in a statistical tie at the moment. You guys are the ones gambling on the weaker candidate, remember that in November if things don't turn out the way you expect.
 
That's because republicans are stupid, you spend a lot of time highlighting that fact on this forum all the time

Sanders beats Trump by double digits in the general election, Clinton and Trump are in a statistical tie at the moment. You guys are the ones gambling on the weaker candidate, remember that in November if things don't turn out the way you expect.
Polls will change when either Sanders or Trump actually detail their plans
 
Back
Top