Can anyone passionately and intelligently explain what Southern pride in relation to the Rebel flag

[nitro harley]

What's funny is.
After Trump loses in November
I'm going to end every post with TRUMP!

I have to say chesus, you look like a winner wearing that. You will get bolder as time goes by. TRUMP!

 

[UncleBuck]

Poopy pants, No, that was all bucky boy.

now you are so pathetic and desperate you are denying your own posts from earlier today.

you must have an incredibly tiny, shriveled penis which is always flaccid.

 

[Rob Roy]

So we don't ignore but can't control people on their property, what do we do?

By you very argument, if we can't control someone on their own property, they are free to do anything? Including diddling children.

You and I have both drawn a line in the sand. We are just arguing where to place it.

Except the person "controlling their own property" has ceased to control only "their own property" if they are applying offensive force to another person, who they do not own and should not own.

So your statement doesn't lessen the idea that clearly defined property rights can act as solutions, it strengthens it.

 

[Rob Roy]

Your answer is very clear
You think it should be legal for adults to fuck kids

I don't hold the same superstition that you do, where all things can be reduced to "legal or illegal" as the parameters for acceptable and unacceptable. So the context of your claim is skewed, when applied to me, I don't assign legality the same status you do, slave.

For instance, while we both personally oppose large age differences among people who engage in sex. I don't see what the harm is if all parties involved have the wherewithal to consent and do consent to an encounter.

Perhaps you could explain where you get the right to apply a forcible intervention into what other people capable of consenting to something do if it involves only them ? I ask that in a generic way, Prohibitionist. You seem to have lots of ideas how other people should run their lives, so I'd like to hear where you get the authority to intervene from....Can you answer?

 

[Rob Roy]

Why are you thinking of a sweaty ass 13 year old in the shower? Stop with the pedo fucking shit. A 13 year old can not legally consent to sex with you.

I was saying hello to you. Now go fold some laundry.

 

[Rob Roy]

the law says you were raped by a pedophile.

That's an interesting point. Since "the law" varies from place to place and is as inconsistent as government itself. Maybe I can claim some kind of victim status and get some "government money" * ?

The term "rape" to be meaningful, needs some consistency in how it is applied. When defining rape, the act or threat of force should be present.... Which is ironic, since when government arbitrarily sets boundaries based on what they think and not what the participants think, they are engaging in a form of rape by their forcible inclusion of themselves.


* more irony, Poopy Pants

 

[UncleBuck]

Except the person "controlling their own property" has ceased to control only "their own property" if they are applying offensive force to another person, who they do not own and should not own.

So your statement doesn't lessen the idea that clearly defined property rights can act as solutions, it strengthens it.

oh shit. he's using bold now. the racist pedo is upset.

 

[Rob Roy]

oh shit. he's using bold now. the racist pedo is upset.

It was intended to help people like you with a short attention span. I try to help the mentally deficient where I can.

You're welcome, Poopy Pants.

 

[potroastV2]

... I try to help the mentally deficient where I can.

You're welcome, Poopy Pants.

Just the same way all of us have patience with the more juvenile posters.

 

[UncleBuck]

It was intended to help people like you with a short attention span. I try to help the mentally deficient where I can.

You're welcome, Poopy Pants.

looked more like a meltdown to me, white supremacist.

 

[Rob Roy]

looked more like a meltdown to me, white supremacist.

 

[UncleBuck]