Complete tard almost gets half a dozen people killed

6ohMax

Well-Known Member
i bet you wish you could kill blacks and mexicans in any way you could though, even if with a feather.



ya fucking klanman.


Fuck yeah motherfucking goddammit

Tell em ....tell em how it is...tell him to bend over and take it like a good man should
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
naww you need to link the article where toddlers were responsible for an event bigger than 9-11. You're just using the libvestite stat where 9-11 is excluded. Just like the libvestites decided that if they exclude 9-11 they can paint christian terrorism as the "real" threat. I still have yet to hear about christians hijacked 3 airplanes and ran them into 2 buildings. killing thousands and destabilizing our economy.
3,000 american deaths on 9/11, and about 30 deaths since then.

compare that to the half a million direct civilian deaths we caused in iraq alone, all at the behest of a born again christian president who thought that god talked to him.

woops, christian terrorism wins a hundred times over, and then some.

toddlers with guns kill about 100 people every year in america. muslim terrorists have killed about a third that many in the 15 years since 9/11.

maybe go be dumb elsewhere.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
This problem is very simple take our guns we will start a civil war and kill those without guns attempting to take them via proxy through people with guns. Then finally we will be able to use that 2nd amendment against this tyrannical government.
lol, the delusions you gun nuts harbor are hilarious.

you're too much of a pussy to start any kind of war with the government, ya gigantic pussy.
 

BamaBoyBeRolling

Well-Known Member
lol, the delusions you gun nuts harbor are hilarious.

you're too much of a pussy to start any kind of war with the government, ya gigantic pussy.
No. I would gladly join a militia if they where too have a bill in proposal for banning guns. How you can tell whether or not my pussy is the grand canyon or a pin hole is beyond me.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
No. I would gladly join a militia if they where too have a bill in proposal for banning guns. How you can tell whether or not my pussy is the grand canyon or a pin hole is beyond me.
you would never try to start a war with the government, and it is because you are a gigantic pussy.

source: a neverending parade of internet warriors who are IRL pussies
 

OGEvilgenius

Well-Known Member
if that were true, you'd be able to own nuclear weapons.

go suck some rawn pawl dick and stop bothering us with your non-stop delusions.
“Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!” Benjamin Franklin

“I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.” George Mason

“That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural and safe defense of a free state; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that, in all cases, the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.” George Mason

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves… and include all men capable of bearing arms. . . To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms… The mind that aims at a select militia, must be influenced by a truly anti-republican principle.” Richard Henry Lee

“(W)hereas, to preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them nor does it follow from this, that all promiscuously must go into actual service on every occasion. The mind that aims at a select militia, must be influenced by a truly anti-republican principle and when we see many men disposed to practice upon it, whenever they can prevail, no wonder true republicans are for carefully guarding against it.” Richard Henry Lee

“At a time, when our lordly masters in Great Britain will be satisfied with nothing less than the deprivation of American freedom, it seems highly necessary that something should be done to avert the stroke, and maintain the liberty, which we have derived from our ancestors. But the manner of doing it, to answer the purpose effectually, is the point in question. That no man should scruple, or hesitate a moment, to use arms in defence of so valuable a blessing, on which all the good and evil of life depends, is clearly my opinion. Yet arms, I would beg leave to add, should be the last resource, the dernier resort. Addresses to the throne, and remonstrances to Parliament, we have already, it is said, proved the inefficacy of. How far, then, their attention to our rights and privileges is to be awakened or alarmed, by starving their trade and manufacturers, remains to be tried.” George Washington

“False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils, except destruction. Laws that forbid the carrying of arms laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.… Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they act rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” Thomas Jefferson

“[W]hat country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.” Thomas Jefferson

Yeah, clearly the second amendment was not written with the intent of protecting against government. And it isn't like they suggested a government with a standing army wasn't a threat to liberty ever either...
 

BamaBoyBeRolling

Well-Known Member
you would never try to start a war with the government, and it is because you are a gigantic pussy.

source: a neverending parade of internet warriors who are IRL pussies
I think I would do good in one as I already have alright cqc skills and good gun skills.So how do I not know you are a part of the parade.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
“Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!” Benjamin Franklin

“I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.” George Mason

“That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural and safe defense of a free state; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that, in all cases, the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.” George Mason

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves… and include all men capable of bearing arms. . . To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms… The mind that aims at a select militia, must be influenced by a truly anti-republican principle.” Richard Henry Lee

“(W)hereas, to preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them nor does it follow from this, that all promiscuously must go into actual service on every occasion. The mind that aims at a select militia, must be influenced by a truly anti-republican principle and when we see many men disposed to practice upon it, whenever they can prevail, no wonder true republicans are for carefully guarding against it.” Richard Henry Lee

“At a time, when our lordly masters in Great Britain will be satisfied with nothing less than the deprivation of American freedom, it seems highly necessary that something should be done to avert the stroke, and maintain the liberty, which we have derived from our ancestors. But the manner of doing it, to answer the purpose effectually, is the point in question. That no man should scruple, or hesitate a moment, to use arms in defence of so valuable a blessing, on which all the good and evil of life depends, is clearly my opinion. Yet arms, I would beg leave to add, should be the last resource, the dernier resort. Addresses to the throne, and remonstrances to Parliament, we have already, it is said, proved the inefficacy of. How far, then, their attention to our rights and privileges is to be awakened or alarmed, by starving their trade and manufacturers, remains to be tried.” George Washington

“False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils, except destruction. Laws that forbid the carrying of arms laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.… Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they act rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.” Thomas Jefferson

“[W]hat country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.” Thomas Jefferson

Yeah, clearly the second amendment was not written with the intent of protecting against government. And it isn't like they suggested a government with a standing army wasn't a threat to liberty ever either...
if you can't dazzle them with brilliance, copy and paste a whole bunch of quotes from people who never lived in the 21st century.

you made a simple statement which you have failed to back up with facts.

you claim that the second amendment is there so that we may "protect ourselves form government".

the government has nuclear weapons. tanks. drones. jet fighters. bunker buster bombs.

can you own weaponry that is comparable to theirs? can you defeat their might with your little pea shooter?

no.

also, you are a coward, a racist, and a little pussy.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I think I would do good in one as I already have alright cqc skills and good gun skills.So how do I not know you are a part of the parade.
you think. LOL

if you are not a pussy, then go round up a militia and go fight the federal government. obama is trying to take your guns away right now, so you have no excuse.

stop being a pussy and put your money where your mouth is.
 

BamaBoyBeRolling

Well-Known Member
you think. LOL

if you are not a pussy, then go round up a militia and go fight the federal government. obama is trying to take your guns away right now, so you have no excuse.

stop being a pussy and put your money where your mouth is.
I am smart enough to know I am no leader, I would only be a able to help a cause not lead one.
 

BamaBoyBeRolling

Well-Known Member
if you can't dazzle them with brilliance, copy and paste a whole bunch of quotes from people who never lived in the 21st century.

you made a simple statement which you have failed to back up with facts.

you claim that the second amendment is there so that we may "protect ourselves form government".

the government has nuclear weapons. tanks. drones. jet fighters. bunker buster bombs.

can you own weaponry that is comparable to theirs? can you defeat their might with your little pea shooter?

no.

also, you are a coward, a racist, and a little pussy.
One they will not nuke there own land in a civil war, two I can take a tank out/blind it with a 30-06 ap2 round if that wont blind it a ap .50 sure as hell will, drones is a tricky one without messing up your own equipment with a emp pulse, for jet fighters start siege on the air strips they use to take off, bunker buster yeah that's even harder one you cant stop those.This war would be a all out shit fest. Also how many military members do you think wont ditch the core and go militia?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I am smart enough to know I am no leader, I would only be a able to help a cause not lead one.
One they will not nuke there own land in a civil war, two I can take a tank out/blind it with a 30-06 ap2 round if that wont blind it a ap .50 sure as hell will, drones is a tricky one without messing up your own equipment with a emp pulse, for jet fighters start siege on the air strips they use to take off, bunker buster yeah that's even harder one you cant stop those.This war would be a all out shit fest. Also how many military members do you think wont ditch the core and go militia?
delusional pussy.
 

CrocodileStunter

Well-Known Member
3,000 american deaths on 9/11, and about 30 deaths since then.

compare that to the half a million direct civilian deaths we caused in iraq alone, all at the behest of a born again christian president who thought that god talked to him.

woops, christian terrorism wins a hundred times over, and then some.

toddlers with guns kill about 100 people every year in america. muslim terrorists have killed about a third that many in the 15 years since 9/11.

maybe go be dumb elsewhere.
Do you really think Bush thought god was talking to him or do you think it was pandering. You apparently believe whatever a libvestite news source will tell you. Which is funny as fuck. I've yet to see Obama end the war. You seem like a Hillary supporter she talks to Eleanor Roosevelt. Obviously the people in charge of our country are crazy enough to kill a half million Iraqi's so what's my motivation to disarm myself? I'm not at all worried about a toddler shooting me. What kind of pussy are you that is worried about toddlers with guns?
 
Top