Connoisseurus Rex
Well-Known Member
I thought that was implied.Please be more direct and say "The temperature of the canopy affects the rate of photosynthesis".
I thought that was implied.Please be more direct and say "The temperature of the canopy affects the rate of photosynthesis".
I'm doing what I'm doing. The plants grow. I dunno what else to tell you.Yes, it will be difficult to keep the other variable the same with the temp increase, you would likely need a sealed controlled environment. This is why it's important to let yourself learn from others who have the resources to do tests beyond your ability or willingness.
I never said it didn't. I actually said canopy temp is ideal, you can get your lights closer in 50 than in 70, which will also provide more lumens. You didn't read the whole thread before popping off.That's correct... The temperature of the canopy affects the rate of photosynthesis!! Good work!
It took you a while to come around, but I knew you'd make it!
So there is an ideal canopy temperature after all! What is the ideal canopy temperature? (for maximizing the rate of photosynthesis)I actually said canopy temp is ideal
Turgidity.Lets not just get caught up in the canopy either. Root temp makes a huge difference as well. If the roots are 50f they can't move the water/nutes as fast as they can at 70f. This can become your bottleneck too.
Directly relates to how much light you can give.So there is an ideal canopy temperature after all! What is the ideal canopy temperature?
You're given 2 identical clones, A and B. Both A and B are grown under 500umol*s^-1*m^-2 with equal SPD.Directly relates to how much light you can give.
what i find ironic ? is i read somewhere he is running 400 watts Correct me if i m wrong there Rex ???? @ 3 feet away from canopy in a tent how is it the canopy is 75 degrees which i question and tent staying at 50 - 55 so 5500 lumens i know which means nothing per sq foot and your going to have them temps on canopy,,Dido that! How convenient he brings that up now.....
You may be growing optimum for your conditions. But your conditions are not optimum. I dont see why you dont understand this... Its not a hard concept to grasp.Optimum is what you, you're own personal preference, recognize to be right. I grow plants at low temps fine. You grow them at high temps fine. As long as both plants grow unaffected by temp, then the plants are growing at an optimum rate.
This is about the plants, remember? You're personal temp preference has no sway on what the plants can thrive in.
I just want to clarify the inverse square law and where/when/how it applies. It happens to be the most sighted but least understood scientific principle on these forums. What the inverse square law says is that as light spreads in an unconfined space the light will decrease in "density"/intensity by the factor of the distance squared. The distance squared is also the size of footprint the light would produce. Now when you line the walls with a highly reflective liner, the light can nolonger spread, and as a result it cannot reduce in "density"/intensity. So in the case of growing in a confined space, the inverse square law only applies to the distance the light will travel until reaching a reflective surface + an adjustment factor based on the reflectivity % of the material. If you had 100% reflective walls it would make no difference if the light was up 3ft or 30ft.Because light obeys the inverse square law, the further away the source of light is from your plants, the weaker it is. So light that is 2 feet away from the bulb is 4 times weaker than light at 1 foot away, and light at 3 feet away is 9 times weaker.
Well actually your saying is light distance should not matter then in a 100 percent reflective room to our eyes but yet for plants there is a huge differenceI just want to clarify the inverse square law and where/when/how it applies. It happens to be the most sighted but least understood scientific principle on these forums. What the inverse square law says is that as light spreads in an unconfined space the light will decrease in "density"/intensity by the factor of the distance squared. The distance squared is also the size of footprint the light would produce. Now when you line the walls with a highly reflective liner, the light can nolonger spread, and as a result it cannot reduce in "density"/intensity. So in the case of growing in a confined space, the inverse square law only applies to the distance the light will travel until reaching a reflective surface + an adjustment factor based on the reflectivity % of the material. If you had 100% reflective walls it would make no difference if the light was up 3ft or 30ft.
You share the common confusion/misunderstanding of the inverse square law. The law is describing how light spreads, it is not saying that light weakens as it travels. It's saying that at 2 ft away the light will fill a 4 sqft space and have 1/4 the intensity as if it were 1 ft away and filled 1 sqft. If it's 3ft away it will spread over a space of 9 sqft and be 1/9th as strong as if it were spreading over a 1sqft space... Get it? That is how the inverse square law works.Well actually your saying is light distance should not matter then in a 100 percent reflective room to our eyes but yet for plants there is a huge difference
example 2 rooms identical 2 lights one placed 2 feet at the canopy in one room and 2 lights placed in other identical room placed 10 feet will growth be the same ??
That's the major difference between sunlight illumination and artificial lights. The intensity of sunlight doesn't change appreciable as you move up or down a couple of hundred feet. With artificial light this movement towards or away from the light source changes the light intensity dramatically.
If a one-watt light source is illuminating an area of one square centimeter at a distance of one meter, the intensity of light is 1 watt/SQ.CM. If we move the screen back to a two-meter radius the same light would be covering four times the area, reducing the light intensity to .25 watt/Sq. CM.
This is the inverse square law. The inverse square law states that the intensity of radiation is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from its source. So a doubling of distance reduces the intensity by 1/4th.