Coalition Oversight-Audit Application into Coalition Finances

N

Nadine Bews

Well-Known Member
bigmanc said:
So as of right now they are acting in good faith..kind of? Should have filed the application in the beginning
Click to expand...
Dear Bimac, the Conroy-Wilcox joint personal representative solicitor client relationship with a non-lawyer has failed to properly produce what was demanded ..they simply 'filli-bustered' and delivered the trust account which of course was properly administered, the bank account that they failed to deliver is the TD Canada Trust Account which Wilcox uses for his 'personal expenses' and where all of the thousands of dollars that were collected through the 82 lock boxes that Wilcox carefully distributed among his 'friends' across Canada and are still in the possession of Coalition so-called administrators and continuing to gather daily hundreds in cold hard untraceable cash.
 
bigmanc

bigmanc

Well-Known Member
Nadine Bews said:
Dear Bimac, the Conroy-Wilcox joint personal representative solicitor client relationship with a non-lawyer has failed to properly produce what was demanded ..they simply 'filli-bustered' and delivered the trust account which of course was properly administered, the bank account that they failed to deliver is the TD Canada Trust Account which Wilcox uses for his 'personal expenses' and where all of the thousands of dollars that were collected through the 82 lock boxes that Wilcox carefully distributed among his 'friends' across Canada and are still in the possession of Coalition so-called administrators and continuing to gather daily hundreds in cold hard untraceable cash.
Click to expand...
Ya but if you didn't file a application you can demand all you want doesn't mean they have to give it...at this point your simply asking for banking information "just because" leading them to apparently calling you a fraud. Correct me if I'm wrong
 
bigmanc

bigmanc

Well-Known Member
gb123 said:
which they are only responsible for giving 10% to the charity they support.

I could be wrong..
Click to expand...
Problem is alot of this is frivoules. Either to do with spite, political tag or actual concern. An application needs to be filed cause as of right now there just asking conroy/Wilcox questions that they don't need to answer.
 
N

Nadine Bews

Well-Known Member
TheRealDman said:
I suggest they get a lawyer...if they're serious. Conroy/Wilcox don't have to release shit without a court order.
Click to expand...
Alberta Court Rules dictate that every best effort must be made at mediation and dispute resolution prior to filing in court. If the Conroy-Wilcox joint-personal representative solicitor client relationship with a non-lawyer wishes to ignore the demand for financial disclosure, then the application will be filed with plenty of evidence that every best effort was made at dispute resolution prior to filing the application for audit. A lawyer is not necessary at this time as the application is already prepared and ready to file and no legal direction is necessary.
 
Last edited:
TheRealDman

TheRealDman

Well-Known Member
Nadine Bews said:
Alberta Court Rules dictate that every best effort must be made at mediation and dispute resolution prior to filing in court. If the Conroy-Wilcox joint-personal representative solicitor client relationship with a non-lawyer wishes to ignore the demand for financial disclosure, then the application will be made with plenty of evidence that every best effort was made at dispute resolution prior to filing the application for audit. A lawyer is not necessary at this time as the application is already prepared and ready to file and no legal direction is necessary.
Click to expand...
IME...dealing in court with respondents with deep pockets (like Conroy)....I predict you're in for a long and very expensive fight. I also suggest you be careful about accusations that you make online. You are about to butt heads with one of the most prominent lawyer's in Canada, and I'm sure he has no problem using your online statements as a case for slandering his name.

If you really do feel something was done wrong, or illegal…then by all means you should persue it. But, for your own protection, I would just deal privately with the respondents...and stop posting online about unproven facts that could be used against you.
 
doingdishes

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
CalyxCrusher said:
He may be a good lawyer, but the most prominent our country has to offer? Far from it. He didn't even crack the top 25
Click to expand...
i don't think he's that great.
he's well known in the cannabis world but where else?
he really dropped the ball with the Allard case. if that's any indication then the other lawyers must be really bad
 
N

Nadine Bews

Well-Known Member
TheRealDman said:
IME...dealing in court with respondents with deep pockets (like Conroy)....I predict you're in for a long and very expensive fight. I also suggest you be careful about accusations that you make online. You are about to butt heads with one of the most prominent lawyer's in Canada, and I'm sure he has no problem using your online statements as a case for slandering his name.

If you really do feel something was done wrong, or illegal…then by all means you should persue it. But, for your own protection, I would just deal privately with the respondents...and stop posting online about unproven facts that could be used against you.
Click to expand...
The RealDman, I have an abundance of proof and I would not initiate the financial investigation without hard and direct evidence and meta-data. I have no fear of lawyers, I fear my own self-destructive thoughts due to inaction. I have not slandered anyone and I post this information on this site as a public service to those who contributed and wish to be kept apprised of affairs. If anyone believes that I have slandered their good names in the process of announcing the audit or in posting updates, then they should serve me notice of same and I shall make my very best efforts to apologize if found to have unintentionally slandered a person's good name or reputation but if they are known to have intentionally committed wrongful conduct and there is evidence of same, then they shall eventually be exposed through disclosure. Please be advised that this is not a personal vendetta, it is simply ''business' and I post from 'intellect' and not 'emotion'. I did not invent the audit process, I only comply with the procedures and protocol. If the Coalition does not want their affairs disclosed publicly then they should not solicit funds from the public and stick with their private investors such as corporations like Green Planet Nutrients etc. These posts are not for their benefit but for the patient who gave Conroy and Wilcox all that they had to give.. The patients not only gave Conroy and the Coalition their scarce funds but also gave them their support and loyalty and 'respect' which should not be blindly given but 'earned'.
 
Last edited:
TheRealDman

TheRealDman

Well-Known Member
Nadine Bews said:
The RealDman, I have an abundance of proof and I would not initiate the financial investigation without hard and direct evidence and meta-data. I have no fear of lawyers, I fear my own self-destructive thoughts due to inaction. I have not slandered anyone and I post this information on this site as a public service to those who contributed and wish to be kept apprised of affairs. If anyone believes that I have slandered their good names in the process of announcing the audit or in posting updates, then they should serve me notice of same and I shall make my very best efforts to apologize if found to have unintentionally slandered a person's good name or reputation but if they are known to have intentionally committed wrongful conduct and there is evidence of same, then they shall eventually be exposed through disclosure. I did not invent the audit process, I only comply with the procedures and protocol.
Click to expand...
Sorry if I've confused you with someone else? Are you not the person that was making accusations about extortion, kidnappings, money laundering...etc.?
 
N

Nadine Bews

Well-Known Member
TheRealDman said:
Sorry if I've confused you with someone else? Are you not the person that was making accusations about extortion, kidnappings, money laundering...etc.?
Click to expand...
Yes, and I have plenty of proof of all allegations or else they would not be listed. All evidence has been compiled in affidavit format in a Motion under section 467.111 of the CCC which is a different matter. The first step is to examine the financial and corporate administration and the principle parties closely associated with the entity being investigated.. This is a universal audit procedure, first you review the financial statements, but the Coalition has not prepared any. There accounting books are non-existent except for the PayPay and trust account bank statements and Wilcox did not hand over the TD Bank statements which is used for his personal and 'other' expenses. The Coalition is going to have to eventually prepare financial statements and disclose them to the court when we make the request through filing the application this week I know that Wilcox likes to think that he occasional FB posts citing how much money was raised at a particular event is more than adequate, but unfortunately for Wilcox, business procedure dictates that when you solicit money from the public, then the law is that you have to provide full financial disclosure in a timely and friendly manner and in proper financial statement reporting format which includes an audited balance sheet, statement of income and expense and notes to the financial statements confirming compliance. But hopefully we shall not have to do this and Wilcox will do the right thing and hand over all of the information and we can quite easily prepare the financial statements ourselves but we cannot do this if we only get bits and bobs of financial information and the mother-lode of financial information (cash collected ect.) has been intentionally withheld. Once again, I did not invent or make up the rules of corporate conduct, I was taught it at the CA firms where I worked but if you have any better suggestions than the current course of action, I would be pleased to hear about your plan for disclosure.
 
TheRealDman

TheRealDman

Well-Known Member
Well I don't think posting accusations (yet to be proven in a court of law) is the wisest course of action for what you are trying to achieve. I can certainly see that behaviour being perceived by Conroy/Wilcox as counter productive to a "mediation first" policy. Mediation is usually conducted privately between the applicant(s) and the respondent(s), not in online forums from the best of my knowledge?!?!

Anyways, best of luck with your case...and always CYA!
 
CalyxCrusher

CalyxCrusher

Well-Known Member
These seem more like allegations, not accusations. Something which she has nothing to worry about slander for I believe. Also, why does this issue seem to ruffle your feathers so much?
 
N

Nadine Bews

Well-Known Member
TheRealDman said:
Well I don't think posting accusations (yet to be proven in a court of law) is the wisest course of action for what you are trying to achieve. I can certainly see that behaviour being perceived by Conroy/Wilcox as counter productive to a "mediation first" policy. Mediation is usually conducted privately between the applicant(s) and the respondent(s), not in online forums from the best of my knowledge?!?!

Anyways, best of luck with your case...and always CYA!
Click to expand...
Please be advised that these posts are for public information purposes...for those persons that contributed to the Coalition and believe that their contributions were either mis-allocated or mis-appropriated; used for other purposes such as for the defence of a private enterprise such as a dispensary or to finance Wilcox's travel and entertainment plans..the Coalition's questionable methods of soliciting funds is another matter entirely.
 
Last edited:
bigmanc

bigmanc

Well-Known Member
Nadine Bews said:
Please be advised that these posts are for public information purposes...for those persons that contributed to the Coalition and believe that their contributions were either mis-allocated or mis-appropriated; used for other purposes such as for the defence of a private enterprise such as a dispensary or to finance Wilcox's travel and entertainment plans..the Coalition's questionable methods of soliciting funds is another matter entirely.
Click to expand...
I have a question, your experience tells me you should know the answer.

If wilcox goes from BC to Toronto for 1000$ but raises 2000$, is this mis-appropriated funds? im just wondering
 
doingdishes

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
bigmanc said:
I have a question, your experience tells me you should know the answer.

If wilcox goes from BC to Toronto for 1000$ but raises 2000$, is this mis-appropriated funds? im just wondering
Click to expand...
that would depend on what he did. if it was outlined that he would use funds to do that then it would not be.
if he wasn't to use the money for travel then yes it would be. even if he raised a million. he wasn't to use the money that way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top