OneHitDone
Well-Known Member
Kinda running some "Other Lighting" too -which incorporates LED'sSays the guy running a 1000w hps in the led section
Kinda running some "Other Lighting" too -which incorporates LED'sSays the guy running a 1000w hps in the led section
Correct My Brother Its A Red And White PanelIts no hps. No purple either. I see pink. We all know what pink is.
White and reds.
Website will be done Jan 15. Beside I Want 1 More Test Grow.Waitin for the LED company link
looks like a pos to me....idk...seems pretty fishy....they post the specs of the 3070 on the page, but say only that the Roleadro "improved" them without saying how....So do the Roleardo/Galaxyhydro COBs actually pump out the wattage they advertize? For instance, is this one 400 actual watts @ 132x3w chips? Does anyone own this product or something similar in quality? Does it work as well as the DIY COBs?
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B013QLEYTW/ref=s9_simh_gw_d15_g86_i1?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=mobile-1&pf_rd_r=0A9HE1X0366DJM6KPF2T&pf_rd_t=36701&pf_rd_p=2068141862&pf_rd_i=mobile
Yeah it does sound a little fishy, perhaps too good to be true at $160 Amazon price... but you never know. My 300w LED made by the same guys does what it says it does. I'm curious to see what wattage this "400w" COB really pulls.looks like a pos to me....idk...seems pretty fishy....they post the specs of the 3070 on the page, but say only that the Roleadro "improved" them without saying how....
possibly better than the standard throwaway cheap Chinese light, but then maybe not. The case is interesting, unfortunately its depending on the multi-spectrum multi-diode Chinese cob leds which have a very bad reputation.Blueearthsustainable.com
Radiant 2000
Any opinions?
I'm a new member & will figure out how to post links later.
Wanted to say though, I'm glad I signed in on RIU. There's more people that know wazup here it seems. Great thread!
fair enough, although I'm betting a white phosphor cob will beat the pants off of it.Now let's not jump the gun and state that the ALT Radiants use the same cheap Chinese multi chip arrays that are known to have a bad rep. For all we know it could be more along the lines of Kessil's dense matrix arrays in terms of quality. No one has used these yet or done an in depth analysis, so we just don't know enough to write them off.
I'm responding on both the Radiant & the Pro-Grow here. I don't know much about the Radiant fixture but I did research all I could on the Hydroponics Hut.possibly better than the standard throwaway cheap Chinese light, but then maybe not. The case is interesting, unfortunately its depending on the multi-spectrum multi-diode Chinese cob leds which have a very bad reputation.
white phosphor cobs is the current level of technology to aim for.[/QUOTE
I'm responding on both the Radiant & the Pro-Grow here. I don't know much about the Radiant fixture but I did research all I could on the Hydroponics Hut.
I don't think their the cheap, low-quality light some think they are. What I found interesting is that upon veiwing these lights several times on the web-site is that there other lights, other then the Pro-Grow 750, like their X5 series (5 watt diodes surrounding a COB) have 5 watt chips that employ their exact spectrum rather then separate colored Monos. So, what do they have multi-chips in 5 & 3 watt? The company (HH) stated that they are the only ones with this technology & that is why they won't release much tech. Info. I couldn't even get the PAR readings never mind a grid with an average over said coverage areas. But even know I wasn't happy with the customer service (answering my many questions & getting back to me) I am still considering getting the X5-500 so I can run it against an AMARE SE-450. When I did finally talk to someone, he said they've been around for 7 years & were one of the first successful LED grow lights. I asked why no-one seems to know about them then & he said that's because most business/sales go to commercial growers. If you do the math on these lights they are only $1.35-$1.75 a watt. So, The cost is very reasonable although I'd much rather have a $/PAR figure to work with as that's what matters most in my opinion with spectrum. I agree the white LEDS rock but I'm not totally convinced that a more efficient chip that equals electrically / lumens per watt will grow me bud most efficiently? For instance, check out the spectrum on the Pro-Grow. It is actually a full spectrum, just low on green. I think green should be there just not on the excess that is given from white LEDS. A white chip may be more efficient to use but I still can't believe it will outgrow a full spectra R&B peaked white, low on green, selected wisely. I aim to purchase both a quality white or a white with peaks in R+B @ 500watts & a quality R+B dominant but full spectrum light (low green but there) & run them in a journal. I think our girls need all colors of the Curve to grow right, it's just that a full white I don't think will compare. I wish someone has done this test for us to see. I am either way. LMK from you guys experiences as I'm new to LED. I am in no way bias. Thanks! BTW, I run HPS/MH so I know those imperfect specs grow me big bad bitches. SSL!