San Bernardino
- Thread starter schuylaar
- Start date
ASCIIGHOST
Well-Known Member
all muslims agree to sharia law in varying degrees. you dont consider shaira law extreme?
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
They bought the weapons they used in the attack legally 4 years ago and they were not on the no-fly list, one was an American citizen born in Illinois
So do you have some unannounced information the rest of us don't that ties this attack to ISIS?
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
No they don't, just like not all Christians agree with stoning homosexuals - as permitted by Deuteronomy
Not GOP
Well-Known Member
Who ever mentioned ISIS? Jump to conclusions much? Maybe the FBI should start to focus on people who go over seas to become radicalized
FBI agents discovered a huge arsenal of weapons and pipe bombs at a California home linked to Farook and his wife Tashfeen Malik. Agents discovered nearly 5,000 rounds of ammunition, a dozen pipe bombs and hundreds of tools for making improvised explosive devices at the property, law enforcement officials revealed today
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3344350/Devout-Muslim-citizen-Saudi-wife-living-American-Dream-identified-heavily-armed-duo-burst-office-holiday-party-slaughtered-14-leaving-baby-mother.html
bearkat42
Well-Known Member
Between 2004 and 2014, suspected terrorists attempted to purchase guns from American dealers at least 2,233 times. And in 2,043 of those cases — 91 percent of the time — they succeeded.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
If not ISIS, then who were you referring to? Boko Haram? What terrorist cell are they associated with?
Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
They didn't buy the guns. Someone else bought them and gave them to syed.
Just to clarify.
mr sunshine
Well-Known Member
Many think men have developed sharia from gods word.
mr sunshine
Well-Known Member
Many think it's the divine word of god.
Not GOP
Well-Known Member
If you're going to quote the Washington Post, at least give them credit...
I thought Obama's expansion of the Patriot Act was supposed to prevent these things. If your angle is gun control, it won't stop terrorism, only encourage it in more "gun free" zones.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
They were legally bought was what I was getting at
I think that's something that needs to be addressed, along with bearkat's post
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
13% of mass shootings take place in "gun free zones", remember?
Places that don't allow guns aren't targetted because they don't allow guns
mr sunshine
Well-Known Member
Real muslims don't kill innocent people, they dont do it period. Especially not with bombs. Wtf... These are religious people..
For example,Priests are fucking children left and right. That's on them and their little dicks, that has nothing to do with religion.
For example,Priests are fucking children left and right. That's on them and their little dicks, that has nothing to do with religion.
bearkat42
Well-Known Member
Only 13%? Then am I to infer that 87% occur in areas that are NOT gun free zones?
budlover13
King Tut
Who runs the background checks? The government. Another fail.
bearkat42
Well-Known Member
Then who should run them? You?
budlover13
King Tut
They are more or less useless imo.
bearkat42
Well-Known Member
Maybe, but you didn't answer the question.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
You would be correct, sir;
"“Gun-free” Zones
Ninety-one of the 133 incidents (68%) took place wholly in private residences. Of the 37 incidents in public spaces, at least 21 took place wholly or in part where concealed guns could be lawfully carried. All told, no more than 17 of the shootings (13%) took place entirely in public spaces that were so-called “gun-free zones.”"
http://everytownresearch.org/reports/mass-shootings-analysis/