We get it, you think 13 year old children have the wherewithal to make informed consent to sexual relations.
No. I don't view people like you do collectivist. I'd agree many, perhaps even most do not have the wherewithal. That doesn't mean that none do though, does it?
A person who can consent, can consent. A person incapable cannot. I'd also say, the likelihood a person can consent is usually higher when that individual gets older. Yet none of that precludes that a person of 13, somewhere, cannot have the wherewithal.
You should stop lumping everyone into things like that, it almost sounds racist.
Also, you are dancing away from the questions I've asked. Can the person who used natural resources to fashion a spear, then be said to own natural resources ?
I know you'd rather obfuscate, does that mean you concede that some natural resources can be owned?