ginwilly
Well-Known Member
I've seen it both ways is all I was saying and believe both to be true. I don't know which side to pick on that one so I'm willing to let it play out and see who is right.Oh and, you are wrong. What you see is a schematic that employs the scrunching of years to hide the lag between the temps going up FOLLOWED by the co2 going up.
What you posted is true, I've seen the lab notes on the experiments. I've also seen experiments where increased CO2 increased temps.
No doubt there have been charts put out by both sides exaggerating each. It's all white noise though.
My cause is anti-pollution and anti-war. I win my cause and the religious sect of the sky is falling crowd wins too, they just won't be happy.