I don't think beating you in a game of chess would require much energy. You have no idea what a free market is or isn't.CHECKMATE, LIBERTURDS.
and you would be able to kick people out your place of business based on the color of skinIn a truly free market, children aged 13 can consent to have sex with old dudes like RobRoy and slavery would be the norm.
In a "free-market" utopia yes...and you would be able to kick people out your place of business based on the color of skin
AKA Rob Roy Fantasy WorldIn a "free-market" utopia yes...
Nice innuendo, I give it about an 8 on the troll scale.In a truly free market, children aged 13 can consent to have sex with old dudes like RobRoy and slavery would be the norm.
In a free market the only ones alive would be slaves because it's hard enough for the top of the brain chain to compete and survive. The stupidest would depend on the.....oh wait......
ISIS? They are redundanites.What type a market is ISIS? They trade and sell slaves all the time.
But they have a big oil market, and at least one major refinery. They also sell crude oil. They make 3 million dollars a day on oil and human trafficing. We all know they are seventh century throwbacks, but their market can't be a free market, can it? Seems like there are all types of rules about chopping arms off, acid face burns, clitorectomies, and stoning family membersISIS? They are redundanites.
In a free market all parties to a trade, interaction, etc are involved on a consensual basis and give THEIR consent to the interaction. I imagine if ISIS espouses clitorectomies as a standard, they may not have the consent of the person being ectomized. So, no their mode of operation indicates they are not interested in a free market.But they have a big oil market, and at least one major refinery. They also sell crude oil. They make 3 million dollars a day on oil and human trafficing. We all know they are seventh century throwbacks, but their market can't be a free market, can it? Seems like there are all types of rules about chopping arms off, acid face burns, clitorectomies, and stoning family members
In your fantasy world, you're not stuck home folding laundry while other guys are out riding motor cycles. Don't forget to scrub the floors before Frau Fog gets home or your ass is in big trouble.AKA Rob Roy Fantasy World
Apparently being black and wanting to purchase is against the nonaggression principal.
Was out riding this weekend. Why would I be stuck at home folding cloths? Why do you think a 13 old can consent to sexual relations with an adult. Why do you share the same views as a pedophile? Why do you think a business owner should be able to kick someone at his/her place of business based on skin color ?In your fantasy world, you're not stuck home folding laundry while other guys are out riding motor cycles. Don't forget to scrub the floors before Frau Fog gets home or your ass is in big trouble.
Define the meaning of the word consent please. I bet you won't answer this.Was out riding this weekend. Why would I be stuck at home folding cloths? Why do you think a 13 old can consent to sexual relations with an adult. Why do you share the same views as a pedophile? Why do you think a business owner should be able to kick someone at his/her place of business based on skin color ?
Why do you share the views of a pedophile? We have laws that make it very ILLEGAL for an adult to have relations with a minor. Why do you try to argue and over-ride these laws. During your statutory rape trial did you use your views as reasoning as to why it was ok to carry on a relationship with a minor ?Define the meaning of the word consent please. I bet you won't answer this.
Which age were you when you developed the wherewithal to consent? I bet you won't answer this either.
I don't share the same views as a pedophile or a slave holder. Why do you share the same views as a slave holder or a thief ?
As far as the owner of property and how they chose to control their property...Why do you believe in two opposing things at once? You on one hand say that a person owns something, then on the other advocate using force to allow others the ability to determine the use of it. Please explain that contradiction.
Let's take your motor cycle ride this week end as an example. Did you own the bike? I'll assume not and that your wife's domineering prohibition on your owning a bike still stands.
Did you tell the owner of the bike, hey mutha fucka I'm using your bike the way I want to or did you obtain the owners permission to use the bike first? If the owner of the bike had said he/she preferred you didn't use the bike, would you have punched the owner in the mouth and sped of on the dinky little Honda Rebel you are able to ride ?
Color of skin has nothing to do with it. Ownership of property and who can disposition the use of something is the point that you miss.