if racism is bad, why hasn't the free market ended it?

GrowUrOwnDank

Well-Known Member
It's in our raising. It's what our grandfathers taught their children who in turn pushed it on us. Some of us realize it's wrong and we break that chain. Others just have to die off. I think down the road and feel in the next 100 years or so as we continue to evolve much of the racism we see today will continue to fade away. Surely it's much better than it was 100 years ago. And racism exists among all the races and within the races. It's not just the color of your skin. It can be ended right now within ones self by adopting a very simple mindset that can be explained in just a few words.

Peace and Love to all.
 
Last edited:

LeeLong

Member
In a free market the only ones alive would be slaves because it's hard enough for the top of the brain chain to compete and survive. The stupidest would depend on the.....oh wait......
 

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
What type a market is ISIS? They trade and sell slaves all the time.
In a free market the only ones alive would be slaves because it's hard enough for the top of the brain chain to compete and survive. The stupidest would depend on the.....oh wait......
 

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
ISIS? They are redundanites.
But they have a big oil market, and at least one major refinery. They also sell crude oil. They make 3 million dollars a day on oil and human trafficing. We all know they are seventh century throwbacks, but their market can't be a free market, can it? Seems like there are all types of rules about chopping arms off, acid face burns, clitorectomies, and stoning family members
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
But they have a big oil market, and at least one major refinery. They also sell crude oil. They make 3 million dollars a day on oil and human trafficing. We all know they are seventh century throwbacks, but their market can't be a free market, can it? Seems like there are all types of rules about chopping arms off, acid face burns, clitorectomies, and stoning family members
In a free market all parties to a trade, interaction, etc are involved on a consensual basis and give THEIR consent to the interaction. I imagine if ISIS espouses clitorectomies as a standard, they may not have the consent of the person being ectomized. So, no their mode of operation indicates they are not interested in a free market.

Some people think they are a creation/ tool of the Empire though.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
AKA Rob Roy Fantasy World
In your fantasy world, you're not stuck home folding laundry while other guys are out riding motor cycles. Don't forget to scrub the floors before Frau Fog gets home or your ass is in big trouble.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Apparently being black and wanting to purchase is against the nonaggression principal.

Apparently your ability to argue a point has ceased. I'm not surprised you are using innuendo as the cornerstone of your lame argument / pseudo accusations.

When people freely exchange, or interact, both parties should agree to the interaction at the onset. If that situation doesn't exist do you

A) force the interaction on an unwilling person

B) leave the other person alone

C) other


So far, you seem like you believe forcing a human interaction is a good thing and would choose A. That's the same one a slaver, a rapist, a government thug and an unemployed internet whiner that exists off stolen money would make.

If you would chose C, please elaborate on which options you would consider and why they are in line with your core principles.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
In your fantasy world, you're not stuck home folding laundry while other guys are out riding motor cycles. Don't forget to scrub the floors before Frau Fog gets home or your ass is in big trouble.
Was out riding this weekend. Why would I be stuck at home folding cloths? Why do you think a 13 old can consent to sexual relations with an adult. Why do you share the same views as a pedophile? Why do you think a business owner should be able to kick someone at his/her place of business based on skin color ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Was out riding this weekend. Why would I be stuck at home folding cloths? Why do you think a 13 old can consent to sexual relations with an adult. Why do you share the same views as a pedophile? Why do you think a business owner should be able to kick someone at his/her place of business based on skin color ?
Define the meaning of the word consent please. I bet you won't answer this.

Which age were you when you developed the wherewithal to consent? I bet you won't answer this either.

I don't share the same views as a pedophile or a slave holder. Why do you share the same views as a slave holder or a thief ?

As far as the owner of property and how they chose to control their property...Why do you believe in two opposing things at once? You on one hand say that a person owns something, then on the other advocate using force to allow others the ability to determine the use of it. Please explain that contradiction.

Let's take your motor cycle ride this week end as an example. Did you own the bike? I'll assume not and that your wife's domineering prohibition on your owning a bike still stands.

Did you tell the owner of the bike, hey mutha fucka I'm using your bike the way I want to or did you obtain the owners permission to use the bike first? If the owner of the bike had said he/she preferred you didn't use the bike, would you have punched the owner in the mouth and sped of on the dinky little Honda Rebel you are able to ride ?

Color of skin has nothing to do with it. Ownership of property and who can disposition the use of something is the point that you miss.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Define the meaning of the word consent please. I bet you won't answer this.

Which age were you when you developed the wherewithal to consent? I bet you won't answer this either.

I don't share the same views as a pedophile or a slave holder. Why do you share the same views as a slave holder or a thief ?

As far as the owner of property and how they chose to control their property...Why do you believe in two opposing things at once? You on one hand say that a person owns something, then on the other advocate using force to allow others the ability to determine the use of it. Please explain that contradiction.

Let's take your motor cycle ride this week end as an example. Did you own the bike? I'll assume not and that your wife's domineering prohibition on your owning a bike still stands.

Did you tell the owner of the bike, hey mutha fucka I'm using your bike the way I want to or did you obtain the owners permission to use the bike first? If the owner of the bike had said he/she preferred you didn't use the bike, would you have punched the owner in the mouth and sped of on the dinky little Honda Rebel you are able to ride ?

Color of skin has nothing to do with it. Ownership of property and who can disposition the use of something is the point that you miss.
Why do you share the views of a pedophile? We have laws that make it very ILLEGAL for an adult to have relations with a minor. Why do you try to argue and over-ride these laws. During your statutory rape trial did you use your views as reasoning as to why it was ok to carry on a relationship with a minor ?

If you want to only let certain types in your business, open it as a private club with membership.
Open to the public means just that. Why are you against the Civil Rights Act?
 
Top