desert dude
Well-Known Member
Roderick Scott!
George Zimmerman is sub-human.
- Thread starter althor
- Start date
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
citation, munchkin.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
She lied under oath about her age at the time of the incident and her whereabouts at his funeral.
Lord Kanti
Well-Known Member
From what I've read:
•He was on neighborhood watch
•He was investigating a trespasser
•He confronted the trespasser
•The trespasser attacked him
•The trespasser then proceeded to beat his head into the concrete
•He reached for his gun and stopped his attacker.
Remember boys and girls: keep your hands to yourself. You never know when someone might defend oneself and stand his or her ground.
Last edited:
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
we've gone over this already. not even an iota of similarity.
you are a white supremacist who says nothing relevant to any discussion, ever.
go away, or kill yourself.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
nothing of what you said is true.
zimmerman was not on neighborhood watch when he went to the store to buy lunch for the week.
martin was not a trespasser, he was living there.
zimmerman went out with two flashlights and a loaded handgun to confront martin.
zimmerman most likely attacked martin. martin was a kid who ran away.
beating a head into concrete leaves more than tiny little scratches.
the screaming stopped as soon as the gun went off. the gun was puleld and martin was screaming for his life when zimmbitch shot the innocent kid.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
He violated at least 3 of his neighborhood watch rules
Including
No guns
Don't confront
It's also impossible to trespass on public sidewalks.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
he never identified himself either.
he jsut got his gun and two flashlights and started chasing a kid in the dark.
that's the best way to make someone fear for their life, thereby justifying death to the chaser.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
Did he have a Swiss army knife and a rape whistle too? You gotta balance out the load with those two flashlights.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
those flashlights that he used to search for a kid who ran away? i had no idea that chasing after somoene who ran away and searching for them with a loaded handgun in the dark counted as self defense.
did you learn that talking point in your klan chapter meeting out there in ridgecrest, ca?
desert dude
Well-Known Member
Simple self defense. Unanimous verdict. Z was not charged for 42 days because the prosecution had no case, because it was plainly simple self defense and they knew it.
You guys need a better poster child. Continually defending Trayvon, who was trying to murder an innocent citizen and forfeited his own life in the process, marks you as either stupid, or racist. Some on RIU are glaringly stupid, some are ignorant of the facts, and some are plainly racist.
Maybe those teenagers who were shot by the guy who was annoyed at their loud music would be a better poster child for you guys. I guess that incident doesn't engorge your social justice boners because the shooter was quickly charged, tried and convicted, hence it doesn't fit with your racist world view. It's the same reason you ignore the analogous Roderick Scott shooting. The "bad guy" in that case doesn't fit your racist world view, and the dead kid plainly "deserved" to be shot dead because of your racist world view.
Some of you would be lynching people if you weren't just armchair racists.
You guys need a better poster child. Continually defending Trayvon, who was trying to murder an innocent citizen and forfeited his own life in the process, marks you as either stupid, or racist. Some on RIU are glaringly stupid, some are ignorant of the facts, and some are plainly racist.
Maybe those teenagers who were shot by the guy who was annoyed at their loud music would be a better poster child for you guys. I guess that incident doesn't engorge your social justice boners because the shooter was quickly charged, tried and convicted, hence it doesn't fit with your racist world view. It's the same reason you ignore the analogous Roderick Scott shooting. The "bad guy" in that case doesn't fit your racist world view, and the dead kid plainly "deserved" to be shot dead because of your racist world view.
Some of you would be lynching people if you weren't just armchair racists.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
getting your gun and jumping out of your car to chase a fleeing, unarmed child is not self defense.
hence why half the jurors wanted him charged with murder or manslaughter.
actually, trayvon was the one defending himself from an unidentified stranger who followed and stalked him in the dark.
some are all three, like you.
why did you join that white supremacy group?
no, it's because roderick scott identified himself, said he was armed, and then was charged anyway and multipkel iving witnesses back up the account.
that shit wouldn't even fly in your klan chapter, loser.
again, why did you join a white supremacy group?
you've never explained hat one, except that you wanted to be courteous to the white supremacist holocaust deniers.
potroastV2
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
what was the name of that group he joined? maybe it's in your archives.Oh, the irony!
as i recall, it was named the "white nationalists and white separatists" group.
i guess we are just racist against white people.
potroastV2
Well-Known Member
I think it was called Racists and Rednecks Only.
They need to keep it simple, for obvious reasons.
They need to keep it simple, for obvious reasons.
The only reason the psycho got off is because the prosecution were morons. If they had any sense at all, they wouldn't have gone after murder but numerous other charges like reckless endangerment, manslaughter, etc. If they had gone for any of those lesser sentences his ass would have been found guilty.
If ANYONE was standing their ground it was Martin.
If ANYONE was standing their ground it was Martin.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Thanks
desert dude
Well-Known Member
The tards are all stirred up.
