EXCUSE ME?!..The OFFICIAL Bernie Sanders For President 2016 Thread

Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Grandpapy said:
To be honest, I thought you/anyone could see from my previous posts that not all "1%'s" are total scum sucking profit leaches.

But lets be honest, the 2,3,&4%'s as well as Non Profits have a role to play as well.

How does one measure the amount of Profit minded officials over Public minded officials located in the Energy Dept., FDA, or, or, or,.?

How will "GE" (see dollars) influence the outcome of the next Speaker of the House?

Why is my voting dollar so much smaller then "GE's"?

Sorry for any confusion I caused you.
Click to expand...

Corporations are a government construct. Conflicts on a large scale, wars, are a government construct.

Maybe instead of polishing the turd of government, people should see it for what it is?
 
Grandpapy

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Corporations are a government construct. Conflicts on a large scale, wars, are a government construct.

Maybe instead of polishing the turd of government, people should see it for what it is?
Click to expand...


And until I can mourn the death of Corporation in Military Cemetery, they have no place in Washington.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
god1 said:
You really ought to try and be a little more critical in your thinking. At least use a little more resolution in your analysis. You're confusing the abilities of the lower 1% and that of higher end of the 1% group.

The abilities are not even close to being the same. It doesn't take much research to figure this out. But to continue to blather nonsense just makes you and the others that do the same look stupid.

Suggestion, quantize the 1% bracket in terms of income and ability to influence the politics you speak of. You will quickly realize that the top end of the bracket has very little to do with the political influence you speak of.

.1% = 1/1000
1% = 1/100

Think a little before you start yapping. Reciting politically motivated slogans that you don't understand is not good.
Click to expand...
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
god1 said:
Look I don't know you and I don't mean to belittle, but if you're talking about people who can truly influence politically, you're talking the < .1% and corporations.

The rest of us are just dog shit like everybody else.
Click to expand...
As it happens, the one percent are much more politically active than those beneath, because they tend to have both money and leisure time to pursue them.

They tend to be more conservative than either the 0.1% or one in a thousand or the 0.01%, or the one in ten thousand. Why? Because, just as you say, they're still on the outside looking in at the real money.
 
squarepush3r

squarepush3r

Well-Known Member
Bernie Sanders has a good chance to win it all I think. Even though he is democrat, he is very old, and most of the Fox News viewers are also very old. So while they may disagree with him, they can identify with him being old, and they know he wont' take away their Social Security and Medicare. So he potentially could take a lot of the Fox News republican votes.
 
G

god1

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
As it happens, the one percent are much more politically active than those beneath, because they tend to have both money and leisure time to pursue them.

They tend to be more conservative than either the 0.1% or one in a thousand or the 0.01%, or the one in ten thousand. Why? Because, just as you say, they're still on the outside looking in at the real money.
Click to expand...

Not sure where your getting your information, here's my experience with the upper end of the bracket; mid to older professional wage earners, doctors, dentist, attorneys, business guys, ect.. Social liberals, fiscal conservatives typically moderates politically. In my opinion, you're giving this group way to much credit in terms of political clout. The 50K club makes more noise than these guys.

1-2 million bucks net worth doesn't make you wealthy or rich. With entry into the 1% club at 350-400K pre-tax, the top of the bracket ain't attending many 100-200K fund raisers, nor are they buying much political influence as individuals. The earned income guy is "teeny tiny" comparatively speaking to the .1% club.

If the goal is to target the "trick" looking for more than a political hand job, look else where. You've got the wrong group. You need to be looking at the fractional bracket below that of the 1%'ers. After all, how many suitors does a "political whore" really want? One fat sugar daddy vs a bunch of little grubby shits?
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
god1 said:
Not sure where your getting your information, here's my experience with the upper end of the bracket; mid to older professional wage earners, doctors, dentist, attorneys, business guys, ect.. Social liberals, fiscal conservatives typically moderates politically. In my opinion, you're giving this group way to much credit in terms of political clout. The 50K club makes more noise than these guys.

1-2 million bucks net worth doesn't make you wealthy or rich. With entry into the 1% club at 350-400K pre-tax, the top of the bracket ain't attending many 100-200K fund raisers, nor are they buying much political influence as individuals. The earned income guy is "teeny tiny" comparatively speaking to the .1% club.

If the goal is to target the "trick" looking for more than a political hand job, look else where. You've got the wrong group. You need to be looking at the fractional bracket below that of the 1%'ers. After all, how many suitors does a "political whore" really want? One fat sugar daddy vs a bunch of little grubby shits?
Click to expand...
TL;DR

Please note that nobody gives enough fucks about you to read through a wall of text just to see they disagree with you. That would be pointless. No offense or anything, I'm just warning others who might waste moments of their lives on reading such an uninteresting bootlicker post.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top