CALIFORNIA, new marijuana regulation act
- Thread starter chuck estevez
- Start date
caherbgrower
Well-Known Member
Can't really explain how pissed this shit makes me. This is an outright attack on our freedom and health. I'm tired of reading through endless pages of law written by a group of control-freak douche bags with nothing better to do. These folks don't understand that humans have an endocannabinoid system that requires cannabis compounds to function properly. I need this plant and so do all of them. I'll print this pdf out and proceed to wipe my ass with it as needed because that's all this is worth to me. It's trash and infringement at its finest.
chuck estevez
Well-Known Member
unfortunately, gov brown is going to sign it http://www.ibtimes.com/california-marijuana-legalization-2015-new-medical-marijuana-law-rankles-top-cannabis-2094342
harris hawk
Well-Known Member
That good - maybe other states will use something like this. All eyes on on California for total legalization in 2016
caherbgrower
Well-Known Member
There is no such thing as total legalization if there are any legal papers associated with it. This plant should be treated like we treat food or any other plant.
a mongo frog
Well-Known Member
I still don't understand anything I'm reading from this thing. I have no idea what it means.
caherbgrower
Well-Known Member
That should raise a red flag for you.
chuck estevez
Well-Known Member
first part says you need your primary care physician to give a state recommendation, no more $35 quick rec's
second part is about a bureau to enforce new laws
article 4 is all about the licensing
part here
(a) A qualified patient who cultivates, possesses, stores, manufactures, or transports cannabis exclusively for his or her personal medical use but who does not provide, donate, sell, or distribute cannabis to any other person or entity is not, thereby, engaged in commercial cannabis activity and is, therefore, exempt from the licensure requirements of this part. (b) A primary caregiver who cultivates, possesses, stores, manufactures, transports, donates, or provides cannabis exclusively for the personal medical purposes of no more than five specified qualified patients for whom he or she is the primary caregiver within the meaning of Section 11362.7 of the Health and Safety Code, but who does not receive remuneration for these activities except for compensation in full compliance with subdivision (c) of Section 11362.765 of the Health and Safety Code is not engaged in commercial cannabis activity and is, therefore, exempt from the licensure requirements of this part.
110. (a) Licensing authorities may issue state licenses only to qualified applicants engaging in commercial cannabis activity pursuant to this chapter. Upon the date of implementation of regulations by the licensing authorities, no person shall engage in commercial cannabis activity without possessing both a state license and a local permit, license, or other authorization. (b) A licensee shall not commence activity under the authority of a state license until the applicant has obtained, in addition to the state license, a license or permit from the local jurisdiction in which he or she proposes to operate, following the requirements of the applicable local ordinances. (c) Revocation of a local license or permit shall terminate the ability of a medical cannabis business to operate within that local jurisdiction until the local jurisdiction reinstates or reissues the local license or permit. (d) Revocation of a state license shall terminate the ability of a medical cannabis business to operate within California until the bureau reinstates or reissues the state license. (e) In addition to the provisions of this part, local jurisdictions retain the power to assess fees and taxes, as applicable, on facilities that are licensed pursuant to this part and the business activities of those licensees. 111. (a) A licensing authority shall promulgate regulations for implementation of its respective responsibilities in the enforcement of this chapter.
112. (a) An applicant for a state license shall do all of the following: (1) Submit the applicant’s fingerprint images as follows: (A) The applicant shall electronically submit to the Department of Justice fingerprint images and related information required by the Department of Justice for the purpose of obtaining information as to the existence and content of a record of state or federal convictions and arrests, and information as to the existence and content of a record of state or federal convictions and arrests for which the Department of Justice establishes that the person is free on bail or on his or her own recognizance, pending trial or appeal. (B) The Department of Justice shall provide a response to the bureau pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (p) of Section 11105 of the Penal Code. (C)The licensing authority shall request from the Department of Justice subsequent notification service, as provided pursuant to Section 11105.2 of the Penal Code, for applicants. (D)The Department of Justice shall charge the applicant a fee sufficient to cover the reasonable cost of processing the requests described in this paragraph. (2) Provide documentation issued by the local jurisdiction in which the proposed business is operating or will operate certifying that the applicant is or will be in compliance with all local ordinances and regulations. (3) Provide evidence of the legal right to occupy and use an established location. (4) If the proposed facility is a cultivator or a dispensary, provide evidence that the proposed facility is located beyond at least a 600 foot radius from a school, as required by Section 11362.768 of the Health and Safety Code. (5) Provide a statement, signed by the applicant under penalty of perjury, that the information provided is complete, true, and accurate. (6)(A) For an applicant with 20 or more employees, provide a statement that the applicant will enter into, or demonstrate that it has already entered into, and abide by the terms of a labor peace agreement
chuck estevez
Well-Known Member
what it will probably do is recreate the black market and $60 1/8th's
a mongo frog
Well-Known Member
Why would a red flag be raised for me? Nothing going to change for me. My only concern is patients rights and access to med weather its patient to patient or getting meds at dispensary. Any legislation that comes across where medical patients rights are fucked with via legalization iam and most californians will vote down. So basically jerry can sign this and it still aint going to mean shit. Those are just my thoughts. I seriously doubt anything is going to change.
chuck estevez
Well-Known Member
I was saying the same thing, just because they put an injunction on a gang hood, doesn't mean the bangers are going to change to nice guys.
mr sunshine
Well-Known Member
I don't think I'm going to re new my rec ever again.. THUG LIFE!
caherbgrower
Well-Known Member
Most californians voted for the guy signing this bill. Any kind of legislation regarding cannabis raises concern for me and should for everyone. Reason being is these guys that produce these laws have cages that they like to lock people in, and have nothing better to do than form bureaus to fuck with the free.