Fuck you Fast Buds.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bob Zmuda said:
IMO it's creepier that some people see nothing wrong here. To each their own.

Like I said they could have a picture of mila kunis spread eagle beagle and I wouldn't buy a pack of their BS genetics.

Yet Bodhi or GGG could offer a dog turd free with every pack of seeds and I'd still be buying them. :)
Click to expand...

Yea it's creepy that instead of people saying it's wrong to combine Girl Scouts with any form of sexual advertising, people are focusing on it being "kiddie porn" because the breasts are too small.
 
weed_dawg69 said:
Hey guys, are you guys seriously trying to guess the age of a painting and work out whether she is under age or not? Jesus...its just a picture! for those of you interested in art, this picture is taken from Richard Phillips "dirty vegas" series and changed a bit with their design. Congrats to all the clever people on this thread talking a load of nonsense about a subject they don’t even understand...
Click to expand...
weed_dawg69 said:
Honestly you are overanalyzing this, there are countless ads out there that are far worse. If you don't like the ad don't buy the product.
Bad mouthing a company because you disagree with a picture makes no sense, not to mention making assumptions about fastbuds and Richard Phillips without any facts to back up said assumptions is just stupid.
Click to expand...

Do you happen to own or work for Fast Buds?
 
BDOGKush said:
Yea it's creepy that instead of people saying it's wrong to combine Girl Scouts with any form of sexual advertising, people are focusing on it being "kiddie porn" because the breasts are too small.
Click to expand...

Yeah to me it's strictly the Girl Scout combined with tits. I googled maximum age you can be a Girl Scout and it's "12th grade". I know some pervs will respond with "some girls turn 18 while in 12th grade!"

Yes but most don't and I think we know where fast seeds was going with this. I have 3 sisters, a wife, nieces etc etc. I guess when I see shit like this I'm keeping them in mind.

I love my wife's tiny Asian tatas! :)
 
Amos Otis said:
You wouldn't trash talk the Bears sitting in Ditka's Restaurant without expecting the Bears lovers there to 'defend' them [at the very least]. Same here....[sort of]. They're just defending what they love....and it ain't the seeds. :lol:
Click to expand...
Lol! I was just very close to spitting coffee all over the screen! "Da bears!" Ha!

Ps. In that situation I would fully expect to be pummeled by some large, drunk bears fans. :(
 
Last edited:
Bob Zmuda said:
Yeah to me it's strictly the Girl Scout combined with tits. I googled maximum age you can be a Girl Scout and it's "12th grade". I know some pervs will respond with "some girls turn 18 while in 12th grade!"

Yes but most don't and I think we know where fast seeds was going with this. I have 3 sisters, a wife, nieces etc etc. I guess when I see shit like this I'm keeping them in mind.

I love my wife's tiny Asian tatas! :)
Click to expand...

I've seen plenty off GSC seed ads where they dress up a hot model in a skimpy Girl Scout outfit and don't remember any outrage over it.

Is it the nudity that crosses the line or the outfit? Some posts on this thread imply they'd be fine with that ad if the girl looked older or had bigger breasts.

I think any form of sexual advertising combined with the name of a children's organization is wrong and that GSC is a poor strain name.
 
BDOGKush said:
I've seen plenty off GSC seed ads where they dress up a hot model in a skimpy Girl Scout outfit and don't remember any outrage over it.

Is it the nudity that crosses the line or the outfit? Some posts on this thread imply they'd be fine with that ad if the girl looked older or had bigger breasts.

I think any form of sexual advertising combined with the name of a children's organization is wrong and that GSC is a poor strain name.
Click to expand...

Imvho it's the uniform combined with the nudity and the fact she looks very very young. just an all around fail. I'm far from "outraged" over it. I've seen much worse. Just kinda bugged me to see people defending it. Someone may wanna check their hard drives if ya catch my drift. ;)
 
The ad is in poor taste. No question.

Also raises a new question.

Is the name gsc appropriate considering the current legality
of mj in most parts of the world?

Should be boycotting the strain too, no?
 
Considering that purchasing SAID seeds are illegal ( make sure Five-o isn't watching ) , much less germinating " these souvenirs " ( smirk ). The " idea" of this is to draw your attention to it. Everything is photoshopped INCLUDING the Bud of the particular strain you are looking at. There are Stupid and yet MEMORABLE names for strains , it's marketing. That's all. So they show a FAKE GIRL SCOUT , big whoop. If that pic is gonna keep me from some quality smoke then they FAILED.

There are strains called : Shit , Cat Piss , Kush Kookie's , bubblegum ( watch out kids - eyeroll ) and Green Crack and on and on. Breeders want to have that name that is as recognizeable and memorable as possible with a catchy name.

Hell , I'm dusting an AK-48 AUTO with an old OLD OG sativa and I'm gonna call it : Preemie Baby Brains or Kitten Stomper ... Or maybe Sweet Jesus Cough.

Seriously does it REALLY FUCKING MATTER ?????? :wall:

Fuck all this PC CORRECT BULLSHIT -- Gimmee my fuckin seeds.
 
Bob Zmuda said:
Imvho it's the uniform combined with the nudity and the fact she looks very very young. just an all around fail. I'm far from "outraged" over it. I've seen much worse. Just kinda bugged me to see people defending it. Someone may wanna check their hard drives if ya catch my drift. ;)
Click to expand...

hard-drive?
:twisted:
ah you mean jump drive, stored in my slaves mouth, protected by a fastbuds ball gag?

safe word is "banana".
& listen to their conversation.
they're talking about you & you & you.

who cares what you do at home... zeitgeist.
in a world where "the new normal" caitlyn jenner
celebrates father's day in the womans bathroom. lol.
but if its full of ladies the mens room will do just fine.

even assam bin douche bag had porn on his p/c.
ouch. but credibility as a jih@di never in doubt.

hoover wore dresses. ability to govern is ?able?
images are images. art is precious imo. but not when you gank it & fu&k it up.

& fastbuds ill never grow.
all these truths i speak ;-)
 
Last edited:
Ok this thread is officially bumming me out. If you like fast buds genetics and marketing approach then by all means buy them. IMO OP had a valid point. Others disagree while entirely missing the point. Wait, what was the point again? :)
 
Bob Zmuda said:
Ok this thread is officially bumming me out. If you like fast buds genetics and marketing approach then by all means buy them. IMO OP had a valid point. Others disagree while entirely missing the point. Wait, what was the point again? :)
Click to expand...

If anyone has a problem with the advertisement they should be equally offended
By the use of "Girl Scout cookies" being used as a name of a mainly illegal drug.

Clear double standard.
 
ricky1lung said:
If anyone has a problem with the advertisement they should be equally offended
By the use of "Girl Scout cookies" being used as a name of a mainly illegal drug.

Clear double standard.
Click to expand...
Apples and oranges... plus most of the gsc crosses I know of drop the girl scout part and just incorporate cookies into the name because if they have done good work with gsc the offspring should taste like cookie dough.

You cant seriously being trying to draw a relationship to what legally amounts to defamation of name as opposed to child pornogropahy?
 
st0wandgrow said:
Comparing kiddie porn to a plant (that never should have been criminalized) is not a good analogy.
Click to expand...

It's just about the name.
I'm not debating the issue of the image as I agree and stated it is poor taste.

I'm suggesting the use of the name itself as a brand should also
Be offensive. But no one seems to care that this particular strain of drug
Is using the name of a children's organization.

That's my point. Thought it would be clear.
 
ricky1lung said:
It's just about the name.
I'm not debating the issue of the image as I agree and stated it is poor taste.

I'm suggesting the use of the name itself as a brand should also
Be offensive. But no one seems to care that this particular strain of drug
Is using the name of a children's organization.

That's my point. Thought it would be clear.
Click to expand...
The brand name that berner and cookiefam are making merchandise of is cookies not gsc just fyi
Imo gsc was thrown onto it because of the thin mint pheno, so on that we can agree prob better if the girl scouts never came into the name but hind site being 20 20 and all.
 
Last edited:
ricky1lung said:
It's just about the name.
I'm not debating the issue of the image as I agree and stated it is poor taste.

I'm suggesting the use of the name itself as a brand should also
Be offensive. But no one seems to care that this particular strain of drug
Is using the name of a children's organization.

That's my point. Thought it would be clear.
Click to expand...

Your point was clear. I just don't agree with it. You're suggestiung that because it's a schedule 1 drug, the name "girl scout cookies" should be offensive.
 
st0wandgrow said:
Your point was clear. I just don't agree with it. You're suggestiung that because it's a schedule 1 drug, the name "girl scout cookies" should be offensive.
Click to expand...

Ok so my position is that neither the image nor the name should be used.
I'm not sure why anyone would take issue with that position.

There were no comparisons made by me on the severity of either issue, I made the point that persons who are responsible for naming the strain are just as guilty as those who created, posted and promoted the ad.

even the name of the strain is in poor taste and offensive. So why are people willing to pay for it to begin with?

As long as it produces fire nobody cares right?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top