GOP Bernie: Bernie Sanders Says He'd Let Religious Groups Against Gay Marriage AND Keep Your Guns!!!

[Harrekin]

I don't see what the point of all the discussion is anyways, he won't even be nominated.

Shillary will win the Democrat nomination.

You heard it here (several times) first.

 

[NoDrama]

get real, for christ's sake..are you that in love with semi-automatics?

it is middle ground. actually, it's complete ground.

what was it our forefathers said? something about the 'right to bear arms'?

gonna say SA's were not what they had in mind. fact.

learn to compromise, ya big bully!

SA' were not what they had in mind is a fact? LOL...in a fit of inextinguishable laughter.
pretty sure what they had in mind (ever heard of the federalist papers # 46 in particular?) was that people be armed with the same arms that the regular army had.

 

[UncleBuck]

And you're right about our forefathers. They would want us all to be carrying fully automatic weapons equal to what the military carries. fact.

you can't posit a hypothetical (they would want) as a fact. only a very stupid person would try to do that.

it's more likely that the founding fathers would not want any citizens to carry around arms, since the pretty much whole purpose of the second amendment was to repel king george should he decide to come back.

we have standing armies for that type of thing now.

 

[UncleBuck]

You know you're right like crazy people know they're sane.

didn't you predict a 14 point romney win with the utmost of confidence?

 

[UncleBuck]

what they had in mind was that people be armed with the same arms that the regular army had.

no, they thought that a militia was necessary to the security of a free state.

since we have standing armies now, is there really any reason for citizens to have firearms at all?

 

[NoDrama]

no, they thought that a militia was necessary to the security of a free state.

since we have standing armies now, is there really any reason for citizens to have firearms at all?

Woops, so wrong.

“… but if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist.” – Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 29, Concerning the Militia.

 

[MuyLocoNC]

but that wouldn't be a compromise..would it?

The liberal mentality on display. Any time they want to advance their agenda, they call for compromise and expect it in their favor.

Here's the true reality of the situation.

Your ilk want to make it harder to attain weapons and restrict the permissible variations of firearms. Me and mine want it FAR, FAR easier to attain weapons and to eliminate many restrictions on permissible variations of firearms.

A "compromise" using your definition would be for YOU to give ground towards my wishes. Less background checks, fully auto weapons for all. As absurd as it sounds, that's EXACTLY what you just told me is compromise, except in your favor. Sorry, you may be used to that on the national debt, but it ain't happening with firearms.

 

[UncleBuck]

A "compromise" using your definition would be for YOU to give ground towards my wishes. Less background checks, fully auto weapons for all.

no, that is not a compromise, because 90% or more are opposed to that.

 

[UncleBuck]

Woops, so wrong.

“… but if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist.” – Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 29, Concerning the Militia.

if we did that, then the civilian army would have to equal or surpass the WWII army.

we would not even have a standing army.

stupid thing to post, but then again, you are a stupid person.

 

[schuylaar]

you don't need an SA for target practice or deer hunting.

my dad used bow and arrow.

 

[MuyLocoNC]

you don't need an SA for target practice or deer hunting.

my dad used bow and arrow.

That's awesome and relevant if those were the only reasons to own firearms.

Cavemen used rocks, what's your point?

 

[Harrekin]

you don't need an SA for target practice or deer hunting.

my dad used bow and arrow.

Deer hunting with a bow when a firearm is available is seriously cruel.

Why do you want deer to die in pain?

 

[schuylaar]

Deer hunting with a bow when a firearm is available is seriously cruel.

Why do you want deer to die in pain?

dude, this was the 60's..who the fuck knows why..but deer season was needed at some point in the north..deer jump out and get hit by cars all the time left to die a slow painful death..

i believe there is a place for guns however, i'm not a hunter.

i've never shot a gun in my life.

 

[BDOGKush]

Does Bernie Sanders even know what Semi autos are? He's telling gun owners that he wants to ban almost every firearm they own.

 

[schuylaar]

Does Bernie Sanders even know what Semi autos are? He's telling gun owners that he wants to ban almost every firearm they own.

citation..i dunno..why don't you google it?

soooooooo, you need a SA to go deer hunting?, smaller game?..larger game?

 

[BDOGKush]

citation..i dunno..why don't you google it?

soooooooo, you need a SA to go deer hunting?, smaller game?..larger game?

So you don't know what Semi autos are either.

 

[spandy]

pointing to his support for banning semi-automatic weapons

Regardless all the other feel goods he may or may not have to offer, this is a deal breaker.

Fuck his couch.

how about..legal to make (from a kit) and use (hunting), but illegal to sell?

 

[schuylaar]

Regardless all the other feel goods he may or may not have to offer, this is a deal breaker.

Fuck his couch.

 

[spandy]

So you use them, then throw them away?

Someone call John Walsh.

 

[Harrekin]

So semi autos are bad, but a .50 cal with a straight pull bolt isn't?

#leftiesshouldshutitwhentheydontknowwhattheyretalkingabout