Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Presented with out comment.
Presented with out comment.
Please tell me you weren't practicing visualization techniques again.Rob Roy is still a slave and is also being raped.
lol don't cry about it.So in addition to being a poor oppressed white guy who is serving a life sentence for "murdering a lad", you're also an internet tough guy. A keyboard warrior.
What would you do if I whooped your ass?
Can we stop being racist against the Irish please?....here, a gift....you seem heartless
and if frederick douglass were alive today you'd tell him that he did not have the ight to sit at the same lunch counter you sit at.
Hard to argue with Fred!
It's true that Frederick Douglass simultaneously championed both civil rights and economic liberty. But the proper term for that combination isn’t Social Darwinism; it's classical liberalism. The central component of Douglass' worldview was the principle of self-ownership, which he understood to include both racial equality and the right to enjoy the fruits of one's labor.
Consider the remarkable 1848 letter Douglass wrote to his old master, the slaveholder Thomas Auld. It rings out repeatedly with the tenets of classical liberalism. "You are a man and so am I," Douglass declared. "In leaving you, I took nothing but what belonged to me, and in no way lessened your means for obtaining an honest living." Escaping from slavery wasn't just an act of self-preservation, Douglass maintained; it was an affirmation of his unalienable natural rights. "Your faculties remained yours," he wrote, "and mine became useful to their rightful owner."
Douglass struck a similar note in his powerful 1852 speech "What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?" Evoking John Locke's famous description of private property emerging from man mixing his labor with the natural world, Douglass pointed to slaves "plowing, planting and reaping, using all kinds of mechanical tools, erecting houses" as proof that they too deserved the full range of natural rights. "Would you have me argue that man is entitled to liberty? That he is the rightful owner of his own body?" Douglass asked his mostly white audience. "There is not a man beneath the canopy of heaven, that does not know that slavery is wrong for him."
this one time i spent 5+ years chasing a white supremacist around a pot forum where he spent his time wishing federal prison on growers and celebrating when they got it.Fred is a libertarian. I would buy him dinner at the best restaurant in town, then have a gay cake for dessert.
Apparently controversial choice, but allegedly so delicious that God says we're not worthy.Fred is a libertarian. I would buy him dinner at the best restaurant in town, then have a gay cake for dessert.
Good luck with your stalking, ya psychotic freak.this one time i spent 5+ years chasing a white supremacist around a pot forum where he spent his time wishing federal prison on growers and celebrating when they got it.
even when he was put on the 'discouraged user' function for his racist spam, he persisted in thinking that someone, anyone liked him.
he didn't get the hint that he wasn't welcome, no matter what.
i'd wish you good luck on your ongoing quest to rat out growers and send them to federal prison so you could delight your fellow klan members with stories of your heroic rattery, but i don't wish you good luck on your rat pursuits, ya fucking rat.Good luck with your stalking, ya psychotic freak.
you know you're doing something wrong when you get 'likes' from the forum's foremost rat and white supremacist.Apparently controversial choice, but allegedly so delicious that God says we're not worthy.
I'll direct you to a link for further education on the topic.
http://www.godhatesfags.com
and if frederick douglass were alive today you'd tell him that he did not have the ight to sit at the same lunch counter you sit at.
you'd probably call him a thug, too.
you'd cry about him more than you cry about al sharpton.
why did you join a white supremacy group? and do you think quoting frederick douglass will make us forget that you were a member of a white supremacy group?
They are definitely different, but not in the ways that your thinking.Please do not mention Frederick Douglass and Al Sharpton in the same breath, they are hugely different individuals, racist.
What are you thinking that I'm thinking?They are definitely different, but not in the ways that your thinking.
so if you were sitting at a lunch counter, and the owner kicked frederick douglass out because he was black, you'd tell frederick douglass that he just had to respect the racist guy who wouldn't sell him the same thing he just sold you based solely on his skin color?Frederick Douglass has the right to control himself and his own property. He never had any right to control others or others property, nobody does. I suspicion he knew that.
Please do not mention Frederick Douglass and Al Sharpton in the same breath, they are hugely different individuals, racist.
wow.Rob Roy would argue from his position of natural law, he might say that had Freds country of Ancestry been a little more discriminatory when whiteys presented their trade agreements.....
Frederick Douglass has every right to control himself and his property. NOBODY has any right to enslave Frederick Douglass. Reciprocably, Frederick Douglass has no right to force anybody else to interact with him.so if you were sitting at a lunch counter, and the owner kicked frederick douglass out because he was black, you'd tell frederick douglass that he just had to respect the racist guy who wouldn't sell him the same thing he just sold you based solely on his skin color?
and you want me to believe that you are not racist?
I haven't gotten any likes from you in days now.you know you're doing something wrong when you get 'likes' from the forum's foremost rat and white supremacist.
4'11''
so when the racist kicks frederick douglass out of the store because of his skin color, you'd tell him that he has to leave and stop raping and enslaving the guy by asking to buy a sandwich just the same way you did?Frederick Douglass has no right to force anybody else to interact with him.