injunction/court case updates

[doingdishes]

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 48s48 seconds ago
Conroy: most of the information we received came after the date of the injunction. 38,000 patients impacted by gov't changes

 

[doingdishes]

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 21s22 seconds ago
Conroy: no material presented by opposition to show injunction interferes with MMPR in any way

 

[doingdishes]

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 37s38 seconds ago
Phelan: You say there is no evidence, but the gov't says they have evidence there are harms

 

[doingdishes]

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 3m3 minutes ago
Conroy: we have shown in our case that they have no evidence. Is there any?

 

[R.Raider]

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 37s38 seconds ago
Phelan: You say there is no evidence, but the gov't says they have evidence there are harms

Has this judge not been actually watching the trial? like wtf?

 

[doingdishes]

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 49s49 seconds ago
Conroy: what impact would deleting the 150g limit have on Health Canada or anyone else? We say it would have none

 

[doingdishes]

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 50s51 seconds ago
Conroy finished his comments. Break for 10 minutes

 

[rnr]

Has this judge not been actually watching the trial? like wtf?

showing who really rules, we think we have done well till the end, now harpo has paid off judges and there ya have it. I didn't think this would be as easy as it was going.

 

[doingdishes]

Ouch. That sucks.

not yet anyway...I am sure they will

 

[doingdishes]

showing who really rules, we think we have done well till the end, now harpo has paid off judges and there ya have it. I didn't think this would be as easy as it was going.

my thoughts too. i wonder if any of the verbal trial was considered VS the written. Phelan SHOULD have remembered the lack of evidence they provided and how they backed off their stances when under oath

 

[doingdishes]

John B ‏@johnberfelo 4s4 seconds ago
Health Canada state 3 reason why not to....

 

[R.Raider]

my thoughts too. i wonder if any of the verbal trial was considered VS the written. Phelan SHOULD have remembered the lack of evidence they provided and how they backed off their stances when under oath

didn't sound like it today.

 

[doingdishes]

John B ‏@johnberfelo 14s14 seconds ago Vancouver, British Columbia
Judge talking about patients data base , it has been frozen in time

 

[doingdishes]

John B ‏@johnberfelo 19m19 minutes ago Vancouver, British Columbia
John not asking to make changes to plant # or to have new growers just address changes and carry amount for MMAR patients only not MMPR

no new growers??!! that's not what i expected or WANT/NEED!!!

 

[R.Raider]

John B ‏@johnberfelo 19m19 minutes ago Vancouver, British Columbia
John not asking to make changes to plant # or to have new growers just address changes and carry amount for MMAR patients only not MMPR

no new growers??!! that's not what i expected or WANT/NEED!!!

Knew this was going to be a big issue once i read it.

 

[doingdishes]

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 3m3 minutes ago
Back in court. Crown Counsel: We are against granting changes to injunction - problems include having to set up new administration scheme

 

[doingdishes]

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 4m4 minutes ago
Crown: broadening the scope of injunction would have very little or no practical effect on patients who the injunction has been granted for
Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 1m1 minute ago
Crown: Court of Appeal and Manson already determined the plaintiffs have not shown "irreparable harm" to those with 150g limit

 

[rnr]

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 3m3 minutes ago
Back in court. Crown Counsel: We are against granting changes to injunction - problems include having to set up new administration scheme

the gov sucks, and they wonder why some go on killing sprees lol spain might be the next place to move to

 

[doingdishes]

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 6m6 minutes ago
Crown: we say plaintiffs have not met "high threshold" of evidence required to modify the injunction as required in other cases in the past
Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 4m4 minutes ago
Crown: We say the new matters fall into 4 categories 1. impact of inability to change or renew licences or 2. 150g limit
Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 4m4 minutes ago
3. status of the prices of strains offered by LPs 4. status of the old MMAR administrative regime
Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 3m3 minutes ago
Crown: Justice Manson was well aware of dates issues and transitional process and full aware of the consequences - so no need to review
Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 2m2 minutes ago
Crown: Manson knew the new rules of injunction needed to in place to protect the MMPR

 

[doingdishes]

no mention of Beemish or Hebert....or back dating the licenses??