Sexual Transformation

sheskunk

Well-Known Member
You ever grow Scotch Bonnets?

Them spicy, son.

I haven't tried those yet. I'm running the 7 pot, Moruga Scorpion, Yellow Habanero, Cheyenne, Peter pepper, Carolina reaper and a few other experimental strains.

I touched my nether regions once with ground Cheyenne all over my hands. It was painfully pleasurable. Cheyenne isn't even that hot. I can't imagine doing that with some scorpion. Or can I?
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Because Pada, I truly believe that someone who wants to change their sex is mentally ill, and needs psychological and maybe psychiatric help. Because I think the desire to carve or change up once's own body so as to change sex amounts to the desire for self-mutilation.

Instead of radical shit like that, they need help (medical, psychological, psychiatric) accepting and coping with, and eventually thriving in, who they naturally are.
There are people who want to amputate their own limbs because they think their limbs are unnatural, or alien, or something. I forget the name of this particular mental illness, but it does seem to be a mental illness. There are even a few cases of surgeons actually doing the amputations!
 
Last edited:

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Why is there so much emphasis given to "the survival of the species" in this context? I'm sure you agree people who undergo sexual reassignment surgery are a very tiny fraction of the population, so why should it matter if less than 1% goes through with it? The species will still prevail won't it? Why treat these people any differently just because they want to do whatever they want to do with their own body? I don't understand..
Should a surgeon be legally compelled to perform the weinerectomy/snatchclosure?

Is that the next KulturWar battle, a tranny shopping around for a surgeon to say, "sorry, my religious beliefs prohibit me from performing this mutilation", so a lawsuit can be brought?
 

Dr. Jon

Well-Known Member
Unexpected tidbit on Iran, thanks for that.

If you are old as you say, then you remember Rene Richards? She used to be a he, but wanted to participate in the US Open in tennis as a she and won a decision by the NY supreme court to do so.
Oddly enough, while I would have been 8 or 9 years old when the Renee Richards saga played out, I didn't remember a thing about it until I just Googled it. You're correct - not a new issue, this transgender thing. The twist on Richards' case, and the one I referenced earlier, is one to do with transgender athletes. This may be one of those issues that has no good answer. If a young enough male athlete has gender reassignment, can they then compete in women's athletics? The court in the Richards case decided yes. Ironically, Renee Richards herself now second guesses that decision and whether it was fair:
“Having lived for the past 30 years, I know if I’d had surgery at the age of 22, and then at 24 went on the tour, no genetic woman in the world would have been able to come close to me. And so I’ve reconsidered my opinion.” Renee Richards.
Short of abolishing all divisions in sports, not sure what can be done to fix that. On some level, aren't all divisions discriminatory to someone? Under the logic of the court in the Richards case, wouldn't we have to let 20 year old golfers compete on the PGA Senior Tour? Otherwise, it's age discrimination, yes? We now have women's professional boxing. Do we put a man and a woman, of the same weight class, in the ring together? I have to think that at some point, reality sets in. There are some actual, biological differences here. Somewhere down this road, we end up with people getting hurt.

Having said that, I don't presume to know what the "correct" answer is - if there is one. That, and I have wandered pretty far afield from Caitlyn Jenner, whose only involvement in this is once having been a competitive male athlete.

Kudos to Padawanbater2 for a thought provoking topic.
 
Last edited:

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Should a surgeon be legally compelled to perform the weinerectomy/snatchclosure?

Is that the next KulturWar battle, a tranny shopping around for a surgeon to say, "sorry, my religious beliefs prohibit me from performing this mutilation", so a lawsuit can be brought?
wat?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
There are people who want to amputate their own limbs because they think their limbs are unnatural, or alien, or something. I forget the name of this particular mental illness, but it does seem to be a mental illness. There are even a few cases of surgeons actually doing the amputations!
maybe you should notify the APA and have them revise the DSM-V since you are so sure.

the best trained minds in the world haven't come to the same bigoted conclusion you have, so maybe they are in for some convincing from the forum's foremost white supremacist.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Should a surgeon be legally compelled to perform the weinerectomy/snatchclosure?

Is that the next KulturWar battle, a tranny shopping around for a surgeon to say, "sorry, my religious beliefs prohibit me from performing this mutilation", so a lawsuit can be brought?
The big question is...would a surgeon say no to the $$$?

My opinion?

Fuck no, it's a no liability, elective, paid for in cash/on a high % interest payment plan simple slice and tuck job...
 

TBoneJack

Well-Known Member
goes back to your ideology again.

it's nobody's business what anybody does with their own bodies.
It is DEFINITELY a child's business what their father does with his body in this case. The father CHOSE to have those children, and he has a responsibility to be their FATHER (he, him) for the rest of his life.

A parent should never become a science project for his children to see.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
It is DEFINITELY a child's business what their father does with his body in this case. The father CHOSE to have those children, and he has a responsibility to be their FATHER (he, him) for the rest of his life.

A parent should never become a science project for his children to see.
If he wants to now become a she, that is his business. Does not change the love he/she has for the children.
 

TBoneJack

Well-Known Member
Why is there so much emphasis given to "the survival of the species" in this context? I'm sure you agree people who undergo sexual reassignment surgery are a very tiny fraction of the population, so why should it matter if less than 1% goes through with it? The species will still prevail won't it? Why treat these people any differently just because they want to do whatever they want to do with their own body? I don't understand..
Pada, I just mentioned "survival of the species" for completion of the sentence I was writing at that time. I didn't mean that the small percentage of sex changes would affect that.

My main point was that sex change is not natural. It's about as unnatural as you can get. It requires radical chemical hormones, and even more radical (multiple) surgeries.

A desire for that is equal to a desire to mutilate one's own body. That is NOT the answer to their problem.
 
Top