white culture cannot contain itself, erupts into violence. 9 dead, 170 arrested

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
why are you nowehere near as outraged about this as you are about the protesters in baltimore?
All the bullshit aside, will any one of the conservatives on this board address this question honestly?

Why is the reaction so much different from violence committed by a group of white people (where 9 people were actually killed) and violence and looting/rioting committed by a group of black people (where 0 people were killed)?

This is your opportunity to answer without petty redress
 

see4

Well-Known Member
All the bullshit aside, will any one of the conservatives on this board address this question honestly?

Why is the reaction so much different from violence committed by a group of white people (where 9 people were actually killed) and violence and looting/rioting committed by a group of black people (where 0 people were killed)?

This is your opportunity to answer without petty redress
They will never be able to provide an honest answer. Because that would require them admitting they are racist. And they are too cowardly to ever do that.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
The police shot nine of them dead.
How do you know that? How do you know the none of them killed each other during the ensuing gun battle that erupted?
A shit load of them have been charged with capital murder. Again, that seems to be general condemnation.
Individuals were charged with murder, but where is the same condemnation from the media as black people in Baltimore? Can you provide even a single news report condemning "white culture" for the acts of these gangs?
Thugs. These motorcycle mobsters are about as thuggish as it is possible to be. Thugs, I tell you. I condemn them, though I don't support the death penalty. I do support stand your ground laws, however.
So why doesn't this act of senseless violence carry over to the white community the same way Baltimore carried over to the black community?
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
All the bullshit aside, will any one of the conservatives on this board address this question honestly?

Why is the reaction so much different from violence committed by a group of white people (where 9 people were actually killed) and violence and looting/rioting committed by a group of black people (where 0 people were killed)?

This is your opportunity to answer without petty redress
I will speak for myself, though I don't consider myself a conservative:

A bunch of biker thugs killing each other, or trying to kill each other as it is not clear if the cops did all the killing, is strikingly different than a mob destroying a large part of a city. These MC thug gangs are fighting over distribution rights for narcotics. The two things are not very comparable.

Anb by the way... thugs. Thugs. THUGS!

 

kelly4

Well-Known Member
I think the size of a motorcycles engine should also be restricted. If we limited the size of a bikes engine to 100cc's, there would be no biker gangs.

Maybe we should implement a waiting period for these things. Do we even do background checks on these monkeys before they are given keys to these machines? God damn...
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The police shot nine of them dead. That strikes me as "white leadership" condemning their actions. A shit load of them have been charged with capital murder. Again, that seems to be general condemnation.

Thugs. These motorcycle mobsters are about as thuggish as it is possible to be. Thugs, I tell you. I condemn them, though I don't support the death penalty. I do support stand your ground laws, however.
cops are not in a position of national leadership.

i have yet to see you whit nationalist hero rend pawl condemn these white thugs. this was a problem that texas law enforcement knew about since the 1970s, yet white leadership gives them and their culture of white violence a complete pass.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
How do you know that? How do you know the none of them killed each other during the ensuing gun battle that erupted?

Individuals were charged with murder, but where is the same condemnation from the media as black people in Baltimore? Can you provide even a single news report condemning "white culture" for the acts of these gangs?

So why doesn't this act of senseless violence carry over to the white community the same way Baltimore carried over to the black community?
Why would a news organization condemn "white culture" for the acts of these people?

170 of them were charged with capital murder, and we are talking Texas so it is likely that some of these thugs will ride the needle for this.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
I don't consider myself a conservative
Why not?
A bunch of biker thugs killing each other, or trying to kill each other as it is not clear if the cops did all the killing, is strikingly different than a mob destroying a large part of a city. These MC thug gangs are fighting over distribution rights for narcotics. The two things are not very comparable.
The act of violence is different in that 9 people died in one and 0 people died in the other

Why is the condemnation for 0 deaths far worse than the condemnation for 9 deaths?


You're implying one act was "better" because they targeted each other, yet 9 murders occurred, and the other "worse" because they targeted the community, yet 0 deaths occurred..

So in your opinion, is the target of the crime what affects public condemnation? Do you believe that?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Why would a news organization condemn "white culture" for the acts of these people?
because these thugs are white.



apparently, a race is only defined by the acts that race commits when it is black people doing bad things or white people doing good things according to you.

why don't you crawl back to whatever federal rat snitch group of klansmen you crawled out of?

or better yet, just kill yourself.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Why not?

The act of violence is different in that 9 people died in one and 0 people died in the other

Why is the condemnation for 0 deaths far worse than the condemnation for 9 deaths?

You're implying one act was "better" because they targeted each other, yet 9 murders occurred, and the other "worse" because they targeted the community, yet 0 deaths occurred..

So in your opinion, is the target of the crime what affects public condemnation? Do you believe that?
Yes, I am.

If a mobster kills another mobster, that is just business. If a mobster, burns down a city block and makes grandma homeless, that is bad.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Yes, I am.

If a mobster kills another mobster, that is just business. If a mobster, burns down a city block and makes grandma homeless, that is bad.
so why aren't you talking about how the drug war has ruined the white community here, the same way you were talking about how the drug war ruined the black community in the baltimore thread?

some kind of racist double standard there?

no wonder you were invited to a white supremacy group, accepted the invitation, and joined that white supremacy group.
 
Top