Bernie To Introduce New Bill: College Should Be Free Just Like Germany and Nordic Countries

londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
mr. "enter into a contract before you buy a snickers bar" apparently doesn't get how this works.

no one can force you to buy a house. no one can coerce you into buying a house.

but if you do want to buy a house, part of the agreement that you have to voluntarily enter into includes property taxes.

it's a really simple, voluntary, and consensual agreement.

i find it ironic to get accused of word smithing by someone who describes kicking people out of stores based on this skin color "indifference", peacefully offering money to store owners "rape", and paying small children for sex a "voluntary act".
Click to expand...
and no one can force you into having your child recieve a social security number either, but our buddy @Rob Roy did it for his children. Three times he applied for his sons to be part of this great nation.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
and no one can force you into having your child recieve a social security number either, but our buddy @Rob Roy did it for his children. Three times he applied for his sons to be part of this great nation.
Click to expand...
i think you are incorrect about that..see front page of the 1040.

the government requires all dependents (deductions) to have an SS#.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
if it's for real, she needs to contact an attorney.
Click to expand...
Admittedly that story sounds a little suspect, particularly the part about her parents not wanting to help her out, so take that how you will

Either way, I'm sure a parent, even Rob, wouldn't want that to happen to their kid
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
I am beginning to think Hillary is doomed and won't get the nomination. She is just too sleazy, even for the Democratic hard liners.

Who is in second place for the Dems? Bernie is a bit too loony. That only seems to leave Warren, or maybe some unknown type, like Obama, will emerge. Maybe Michelle Obama? That would be epic.

I find it amusing to see Sky so wrapped up in ardor for Bernie, or maybe it is just trolling on her part.

I hope Rand gets the Republican nomination. He is quite good on civil liberties and will make voters face up to Democratic (and Republican) opposition to basic constitutional guarantees of fundamental freedoms. The perfect two-party match up would be Hillary vs. Rand, though as I said I have serious doubts that Hillary will get the nomination.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
I am beginning to think Hillary is doomed and won't get the nomination. She is just too sleazy, even for the Democratic hard liners.

Who is in second place for the Dems? Bernie is a bit too loony. That only seems to leave Warren, or maybe some unknown type, like Obama, will emerge. Maybe Michelle Obama? That would be epic.

I find it amusing to see Sky so wrapped up in ardor for Bernie, or maybe it is just trolling on her part.

I hope Rand gets the Republican nomination. He is quite good on civil liberties and will make voters face up to Democratic (and Republican) opposition to basic constitutional guarantees of fundamental freedoms. The perfect two-party match up would be Hillary vs. Rand, though as I said I have serious doubts that Hillary will get the nomination.
Click to expand...
bernie sanders will be our next president.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
I hope Rand gets the Republican nomination. He is quite good on civil liberties and will make voters face up to Democratic (and Republican) opposition to basic constitutional guarantees of fundamental freedoms.
Click to expand...
your savior doesn't believe in the equal protection clause nor birthright citizenship, and both are written in plain english right in the constitution.

kill yourself.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
mr. "enter into a contract before you buy a snickers bar" apparently doesn't get how this works.

no one can force you to buy a house. no one can coerce you into buying a house.

but if you do want to buy a house, part of the agreement that you have to voluntarily enter into includes property taxes.

it's a really simple, voluntary, and consensual agreement.

i find it ironic to get accused of word smithing by someone who describes kicking people out of stores based on this skin color "indifference", peacefully offering money to store owners "rape", and paying small children for sex a "voluntary act".
Click to expand...

"that you have to voluntarily enter into...." That is quite a contradictory pile of shit statement there, Sir Oxy from the House of Moron.



I'm boycotting (temporarily) our usual nonsense until I get some crayon or until I feel otherwise. Also what did you do with Chesus? You put him back in the sock drawer already?
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
I am beginning to think Hillary is doomed and won't get the nomination. She is just too sleazy, even for the Democratic hard liners.
Click to expand...
What do you base this on?
desert dude said:
Who is in second place for the Dems? Bernie is a bit too loony. That only seems to leave Warren, or maybe some unknown type, like Obama, will emerge. Maybe Michelle Obama? That would be epic.
Click to expand...
What is "loony" about Sanders' platform? Can you explain that or are you simply going by the fact he's a self proclaimed "democratic-socialist"? If so, what's wrong with that?

Sanders is in second place (based on political capital ($$$))

The only reason Clinton is the frontrunner is because she has the most financial support (dare you Republicans think about that one for a second?)
desert dude said:
I hope Rand gets the Republican nomination. He is quite good on civil liberties and will make voters face up to Democratic (and Republican) opposition to basic constitutional guarantees of fundamental freedoms. The perfect two-party match up would be Hillary vs. Rand, though as I said I have serious doubts that Hillary will get the nomination.
Click to expand...
I think it'll come down to Paul or Walker, and Paul will probably win, and he still won't beat Clinton. GOP policy isn't what Americans want
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
"that you have to voluntarily enter into...." That is quite a contradictory pile of shit statement there, Sir Oxy from the House of Moron.



I'm boycotting (temporarily) our usual nonsense until I get some crayon or until I feel otherwise. Also what did you do with Chesus? You put him back in the sock drawer already?
Click to expand...
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
i think you are incorrect about that..see front page of the 1040.

the government requires all dependents (deductions) to have an SS#.
Click to expand...
If you want to claim them as a dependent. They CAN NOT make you get your child a social security number
http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10023.pdf

Must my child have a
Social Security number?
No. Getting a Social Security number
for your newborn is voluntary. But, it
is a good idea to get a number when
your child is born. You can apply for a
Social Security number for your baby
when you apply for your baby’s birth
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top