My 8hr flowering experiment

Gaz29

Well-Known Member
Theres a pile of clones at my other room thats why these looked so lanky in the begining lol
To give the experiment a fair chance is the only reason i havent played with the timer.

Im excited they flowered and didnt herm or die so im optimistic about playing with the timer later and dialing in the maximum yield on total least amount of electric usage.
This isnt strictly about yield or i would just run a bunch critical or big bud like everyone else.
I know it's not strictly about yield ,but isn't the experiment abt successfully doing only 6hours of light AND getting close to the same product ,as you would expect with more light..?
Good work.! (following this with interest),as I'm definitely going to try it soon, but NOT made my mind up.! re: 6/10 hrs) yet ..
 
Last edited:

USbeginnerguy

Active Member
No 6 on and 12 off does not equal 12/12, it equal 12/24. So they are completely different.
I hear you but i dont really agree because a day has 24 hrs which we both know but that is how i came up with it still being similar to 12/12 because its 6 on 12 off 6 on=24 or one day so its still getting 12 hours light and 12 hrs of dark. IMO the benefit is basically making the plant think its seeing more days because of more sunrise sunsets if you will and in essence it blooms faster? Not sure of the outcome but that's the only reasoning i can come up with. Im definitely down for some education if you feel differently have you tried this method and if so how did it work out for you and what benefits do see in this style of growing?
 

thenotsoesoteric

Well-Known Member
I hear you but i dont really agree because a day has 24 hrs which we both know but that is how i came up with it still being similar to 12/12 because its 6 on 12 off 6 on=24 or one day so its still getting 12 hours light and 12 hrs of dark. IMO the benefit is basically making the plant think its seeing more days because of more sunrise sunsets if you will and in essence it blooms faster? Not sure of the outcome but that's the only reasoning i can come up with. Im definitely down for some education if you feel differently have you tried this method and if so how did it work out for you and what benefits do see in this style of growing?
You basically play god and make the plant's day 18 hours and not 24. So that other 6 hours you're talking about is the next day and not hours 19,20,21,22,23,24. Cheers man.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Interesting stuff. Leaving the timer alone through the whole run would give the most honest results.

I have a digital short cycle timer and I've thought about running twelve off and six to eight on- just never had the guts to try it, lol

I'm very interested to see what the extended dark cycle does for the plants.

Not that you're taking suggestions, but in your shoes I'd leave the timer untouched until the whole cycle is finished.
 

torontoke

Well-Known Member
Wouldnt 6 on 12 off still kind of be 12/12 just broken up differently, basically 6 on 12 off 6 on? Either way TORONTOKE keep us in the loop great work and good luck!
I would say the worst part of running a shedule that doesnt add up to a 24 hr day is that your on period would be floating so every other day the on period would be while electricity is most expensive.
Where i live the cost is almost double from 7am-6pm as it is from 6pm til 7am.

I will probably not touch the timer just to let this experiment run its course.

I dont mind people commenting or talking in this thread as long as it stays civil, im no fan of negative drama
 

Hot Diggity Sog

Well-Known Member
I would say the worst part of running a shedule that doesnt add up to a 24 hr day is that your on period would be floating so every other day the on period would be while electricity is most expensive.
Where i live the cost is almost double from 7am-6pm as it is from 6pm til 7am.

I will probably not touch the timer just to let this experiment run its course.

I dont mind people commenting or talking in this thread as long as it stays civil, im no fan of negative drama
That's a good point. Kwh cost is certainly much higher during normal people hours.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
That's a good point. Kwh cost is certainly much higher during normal people hours.
Not here, strangely. I expected to be able to find differences in rates based on time of day but they won't charge private customers like that- here being Colorado.

They DO have a demand rate, which encourages consistent energy consumption; you're charged your peak usage over the course of a month's billing cycle, but a lower base rate. As soon as I'm on my flip schedule again, I'm on this.
 
Last edited:

WattSaver

Well-Known Member
Just read through this whole thread. And thank you for running the experiment. I've played around with the flip time a bunch. I now go 11.5/12.5 at flip which trips flowering quicker than 12/12 especially the sativa dom strains. I've also gone 10/14 for a whole grow and couldn't really see any discernible difference, but my brain keeps going back to more light = more growth. And I think dropping an hr of light during the flower helps the maturing process. I'll be watching to see how it turns out. I have hope in the process, but still really skeptical. But I'll wait and see.
 
Last edited:

vitamin_green_inc

Well-Known Member
Interesting experiment. If the yield is less but flower time is cut down-it might equal out.

I just want to say that a recently read a "Anarchy," book, that would be considered a no-no by today's governemt. Anyway, the book was mostly about survival in a post-apolytic world. MJ and cannabis growing was in the drug section. Pretty interesting read, and it's from the 80s lol.
Anyway, this passage was relevant to this test becuase it mention seeds getting flushed into the New York City Sewer systems. Apparently weed, grows so much down there that they have to go in and cut it or else it will block certain tunnels,pipes, drainage etc.
the author says the plants are nearly white in color due to their lack of sunlight but they live full cycles down there. This was back in the 80s...I can't imagine how many MJ plants there are now!
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Interesting experiment. If the yield is less but flower time is cut down-it might equal out.

I just want to say that a recently read a "Anarchy," book, that would be considered a no-no by today's governemt. Anyway, the book was mostly about survival in a post-apolytic world. MJ and cannabis growing was in the drug section. Pretty interesting read, and it's from the 80s lol.
Anyway, this passage was relevant to this test becuase it mention seeds getting flushed into the New York City Sewer systems. Apparently weed, grows so much down there that they have to go in and cut it or else it will block certain tunnels,pipes, drainage etc.
the author says the plants are nearly white in color due to their lack of sunlight but they live full cycles down there. This was back in the 80s...I can't imagine how many MJ plants there are now!
I find this a bit hard to believe, it sounds like urban mythology. I'd like to see some corroborating evidence supporting this story.
 

Amos Otis

Well-Known Member
Very late to the party here - thanks for the heads up tt.

I'm somewhat burnt out from most things RIU, but catching up, this is a very interesting read. Props to you for the efforts, and for thinking outside your own stash jars.

Which strain was the 2nd male? So sorry that the ss/ pc beans haven't given you a girl.
 

torontoke

Well-Known Member
It was a ss had tucked away in the back of my cab that i forgot to get rid of that turned male.
Its too bad to cus those ss plants were nice.

Thinking i might look into breeding one of these days
Maybe that will be my next experiment.

Thanks again everyone for the kind words, it makes it worthwhile feeling like im actually doing something positive and not just wasting my time.
 
Top