If you have a batwing or simple hood barely 50% of the light hits the reflector. For the total light loss to be 20% that reflector would have to lose 40%, i.e. reflect only 60 opposed to that 95 (which I didn't claim, straw man...). Sounds "stretched". Putting it mildly
Can you really not see the bias... you're reaching. Which can only mean CMH is an excellent competitor. Besides that your IR spike argument really isn't as great as you think, it doesn't actually change the comparison you skewed and I set straight.
No. They "are" not. They can be, if you more than double the costs again. You should add a disclaimer every single time you make such statements. It's not what DIY flowering and veg cobs "now" "are". This is just another typical example of how you make comparisons. Inflate LED, and downplay HID. Same silliness as in post #61.
You just don't get it do you... I'm not the one with a horse in the race. Just because you want to misinform growers about HID doesn't mean I have something against COBs or LED... "HPS hater" became "LED hater" through the typical delusional projecting you guys do, that doesn't affect the reality.
And if the CRI was lower for the MH than the LEDs your compared to you would have told a different story...