charlestonchunk
Well-Known Member
like what...???Not to mention all the contaminant in the dry ice hash.
like what...???Not to mention all the contaminant in the dry ice hash.
....the bits of leaves that make it through the screen...like what...???
plant matter, capitate stalks, stellate hairs primarily, all of which make their way into dry ice hash.like what...???
The thing is though... even the rosin isn't pure. That was my original point. Squeeze the bud. The trichs burst. Goodness of the trichs get absorbed by the bud and the goodness of the trichs that make it to paper also have bids of bud in it. Rosin might be purer than other extracts, but it is still far from pure.Yup some people only want pure hash..as long as it gets me high I can careless if there is plant in it lol.
Very little gets absorbed by the bud. A simple re press will extract any minor amounts remaining. There is very little bits of buds and it's easy too clean out, not to mention the blotter screen tek.The thing is though... even the rosin isn't pure. That was my original point. Squeeze the bud. The trichs burst. Goodness of the trichs get absorbed by the bud and the goodness of the trichs that make it to paper also have bids of bud in it. Rosin might be purer than other extracts, but it is still far from pure.
Let's say dry ice has ends up with 5% particulate in it. The rosin may have say maybe 2%. Those who say they can taste the difference when smoked are full of shit. And for the work involved in getting to that 95% purity in dry ice hash is far far far less than getting to 98 or 99% purity in the rosin.
So.... dry ice hash FTW!! hahahahahaha
So you can extract the juice that gets sucked up into the leaf and calyx and such?Very little gets absorbed by the bud. A simple re press will extract any minor amounts remaining. There is very little bits of buds and it's easy too clean out, not to mention the blotter screen tek.
Dry ice hash is far from 95% purity. If dICE hash is your thing, and it does the job for you there's nothing wrong with that, but it's far from 95% heads.
With a lot of pressure and heat, most everything get's pushed to the side. Losses are negligible, and like I said they can be further extracted with a 2nd press.So you can extract the juice that gets sucked up into the leaf and calyx and such?
I highly doubt that.
And I would expect that the bud, being the first point of contact for the majority of the tricks when pressed, sucks up far more than what ends up on paper. In fact, it's the left overs that end up on paper. Only once the absorbent plant matter is too saturated to take on any more moisture will the remaining rosin make it to paper (aside from some trichs on the outer edges of the but, same principle applies). You can't get around that fact.
With a lot of pressure and heat, most everything get's pushed to the side. Losses are negligible, and like I said they can be further extracted with a 2nd press.
Here's a picture from some results @soilgrown has posted for a little idea.
Also would love to know where the contaminants are in there? I'm not seeing any.
View attachment 3384272
Gotta call bullshit. Once the plant absorbs the rosin, like a water into a laper towel, to get it out you will have break down the plant matter to the cellular level to extract it. That is a fact and no amount of denying that will change it....sorry...With a lot of pressure and heat, most everything get's pushed to the side. Losses are negligible, and like I said they can be further extracted with a 2nd press.
Here's a picture from some results @soilgrown has posted for a little idea.
Also would love to know where the contaminants are in there? I'm not seeing any.
View attachment 3384272
Call bullshit all you want. The proof is in the product.Gotta call bullshit. Once the plant absorbs the rosin, like a water into a laper towel, to get it out you will have break down the plant matter to the cellular level to extract it. That is a fact and no amount of denying that will change it....sorry...
Just because you cant see the contaminants does not mean it is pure. There are contaminents there...microscooic as they may be they are there... cant get around that fact either.No contaminants in the stuff I just cleaned up from half melts this morning.
View attachment 3384273
View attachment 3384274
Can you tell me what these alleged contaminants are and why they aren't present in dry ice hash or other forms of hash for that matter?Just because you cant see the contaminants does not mean it is pure. There are contaminents there...microscooic as they may be they are there... cant get around that fact either.
But i have not argued that rosin isnt purer..only that it isnt pure.
Basic laws of science/physics apply here just like everywhere else.Call bullshit all you want. The proof is in the product.
If you can't understand that with heat and pressure(which brings more heat) you can squeeze nearly ALL of the water out of the paper towel, as used in your example, then I don't know what else to say. The remainder is negligible.
Break the plant down to a cellular level what are you talking about? Stop trying to sound intelligent and look at the evidence. Just the fact that you think dry ice hash is "cleaner" or more pure than rosin shows great amounts on your intelligence. You can around being ignorant swinging your penis about in some measuring contest or you can look at the information that has been presented to you. Your choice man.
The fact of the matter is Dry Ice hash is at the bottom of the list when it comes to the qualities of different types of hash and extracts. There's nothing wrong with smoking it or enjoying it whatsoever, but you aren't fooling anyone here.
One
I did. A long time ago. Same as everything that is in dry ice hash. Just less of it...Can you tell me what these alleged contaminants are and why they aren't present in dry ice hash or other forms of hash for that matter?
Generally speaking in hash making regards, contaminants are anything that is not glandular trichome heads. Plant Matter, capitate stalks, stellate hairs, pistillate fibres. None of those are present in the rosin.
Well you are wrong.I did. A long time ago. Same as everything that is in dry ice hash. Just less of it...
Okay. I am done. Tired of this...
When you can prove there are NO contaminents then tell me i am wrong.Well you are wrong.
Show me in the pictures where the plant matter, capitate stalks, stellate hairs, pistillate fibres are? I'd like to see them.
Last I checked they were left behind in the blotting screen.
View attachment 3384283
You are the one making claims of contaminants. I believe you are the one to present proof. Yet you have none. I think a 25 micron blotting screen and a picture of what's inside and outside the screen should be a little bit enough proof for you. Afterall, remember the contaminants we are talking about here is capitate stalks, plant matter and stellate hairs primarily. I've shown you evidence yet you just want to be a disbeliever. Your choice.When you can prove there are NO contaminents then tell me i am wrong.
Choice is yours. All that extra weight is useless garbage. It has absolutely no cannabinoids present. To each their own. I only like to smoke glandular trichome heads. To me it's not a waste. It's garbage and it has no cannabinoids, no medicine. We're talking about hash here. Purity matters. If not why not just smoke flowers? Contaminant is a bad thing. If that's your thing then that's your thing but like I said you can continue to swing your penis about if you want but you aren't fooling anyone.Bottom line....
I would rather suffer a higher percentage of contamination in my hash than give up over 30-40% of yield chasing a 20% higher purity.
It is such a waste...particularly when NOBODY can taste the difference in that purity.